Is there a number pointing what lightweight mean for zookeeper (like
messages/seconds or message/seconds/size)?
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Camille Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That is generally accurate. ZooKeeper isn't written to be a distributed
> queue in the high-throughput messaging kind of sense. If you need something
> truly lightweight and simple to serve as a distributed queue for a few
> messages, it might work. But for anything that could see significant
> volume, there's better options out there.
> ZooKeeper is used to implement several systems that will serve this need.
> Depending on what you're looking for, you might check out:
> Kafka: http://incubator.apache.org/kafka/
> Kestrel: https://github.com/robey/kestrel
> Or many of the brokered messaging servers like ActiveMQ, etc.
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Diego Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello folks,
> > I got to the Curator wiki page to see something about the distributed
> > queue recipe and got surprised with the big warning telling to not use
> > zookeeper as a distributed queue controller, the reason page described
> > cases that I passed here... is this *TRUE*, if so, what option do we
> > The message:
> > *IMPORTANT* - We recommend that you do NOT use ZooKeeper for Queues.
> > see Tech Note 4 <https://github.com/Netflix/curator/wiki/Tech-Note-4>
> > details. Links
> > https://github.com/Netflix/curator/wiki/Distributed-Queue
> > https://github.com/Netflix/curator/wiki/Tech-Note-4
> > --
> > Att.
> > Diego de Oliveira
> > System Architect
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > www.diegooliveira.com
> > Never argue with a fool -- people might not be able to tell the
Diego de Oliveira
Never argue with a fool -- people might not be able to tell the difference