Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Hive >> mail # user >> Interesting claims that seem untrue

Copy link to this message
Re: Interesting claims that seem untrue
I'd be more impressed with who's deleted the most lines of code...
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Sanjay Subramanian <

>  I have not read the full blogs but in the year 2013 , IMHO , LOC is a
> very old metric that defines good software any more...
>   From: Edward Capriolo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thursday, September 12, 2013 7:19 AM
> Subject: Interesting claims that seem untrue
>   I was reading the horton-works blog and found an interesting article.
> http://hortonworks.com/blog/stinger-phase-2-the-journey-to-100x-faster-hive/#comment-160753
>  There is a very interesting graphic which attempts to demonstrate lines
> of code in the 12 release.
> http://hortonworks.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/hive4.png
>  Although I do not know how they are calculated, they are probably
> counting code generated by tests output, but besides that they are wrong.
>  One claim is that Cloudera contributed 4,244 lines of code.
>  So to debunk that claim:
>  In https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-4675 Brock Noland from
> cloudera, created the ptest2 testing framework. He did all the work for
> ptest2 in hive 12, and it is clearly more then 4,244
>  This consists of 84 java files
> [edward@desksandra ptest2]$ find . -name "*.java" | wc -l
> 84
>  and by itself is 8001 lines of code.
> [edward@desksandra ptest2]$ find . -name "*.java" | xargs cat | wc -l
> 8001
>  [edward@desksandra hive-trunk]$ wc -l HIVE-4675.patch
> 7902 HIVE-4675.patch
>  This is not the only feature from cloudera in hive 12.
>  There is also a section of the article that talks of a "ROAD MAP" for
> hive features. I did not know we (hive) had a road map. I have advocated
> switching to feature based release and having a road map before, but it was
> suggested that might limit people from itch-scratching.
> =====================> This email message and any attachments are for the exclusive use of the
> intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
> information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is
> prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
> sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message along
> with any attachments, from your computer system. If you are the intended
> recipient, please be advised that the content of this message is subject to
> access, review and disclosure by the sender's Email System Administrator.

Dean Wampler, Ph.D.