Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Hadoop >> mail # user >> recommendation on HDDs


Copy link to this message
-
Re: recommendation on HDDs
The original poster also seemed somewhat interested in disk bandwidth.

That is facilitated by having more than on disk in the box.

On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 8:26 AM, Michael Segel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> Since the OP believes that their requirement is 1TB per node... a single
> 2TB would be the best choice. It allows for additional space and you really
> shouldn't be too worried about disk i/o being your bottleneck.
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB