Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
HBase >> mail # user >> Custom preCompact RegionObserver crashes entire cluster on OOME: Heap Space


+
Mesika, Asaf 2013-02-12, 05:46
+
lars hofhansl 2013-02-12, 05:50
+
Ted Yu 2013-02-12, 05:53
+
Mesika, Asaf 2013-02-12, 07:22
+
Anoop Sam John 2013-02-12, 06:44
+
Mesika, Asaf 2013-02-12, 09:30
+
Mesika, Asaf 2013-02-12, 09:13
+
Anoop Sam John 2013-02-12, 09:22
+
Mesika, Asaf 2013-02-12, 14:41
Copy link to this message
-
Re: Custom preCompact RegionObserver crashes entire cluster on OOME: Heap Space
IMO, I don't think it's safe to change the KV in-place. We always create a new KV in our coprocessors.

James

On Feb 12, 2013, at 6:41 AM, "Mesika, Asaf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I'm seeing a very strange behavior:
>
> If I run a scan during major compaction, I can see both the modified Delta Key Value (which contains the aggregated values - e.g. 9) and the other two delta columns that were used for this aggregated column (e.g, 3, 3) - as if Scan is exposed to the key values produced in mid scan.
> Could it be related to Cache somehow?
>
> I am modifying the KeyValue object received from the InternalScanner in preCompact (modifying its value).
>
> On Feb 12, 2013, at 11:22 AM, Anoop Sam John wrote:
>
>>> The question is: is it "legal" to change a KV I received from the InternalScanner before adding it the Result - i..e returning it from my own InternalScanner?
>>
>> You can change as per your need IMO
>>
>> -Anoop-
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Mesika, Asaf [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 2:43 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: Custom preCompact RegionObserver crashes entire cluster on OOME: Heap Space
>>
>> I am trying to reduce the amount of KeyValue generated during the preCompact, but I'm getting some weird behaviors.
>>
>> Let me describe what I am doing in short:
>>
>> We have a counters table, with the following structure:
>>
>> RowKey =  A combination of field values representing group by key.
>> CF = time span aggregate (Hour, Day, Month). Currently we have only for Hour.
>> CQ = Round-to-Hour timestamp (long).
>> Value = The count
>>
>> We collect raw data, and updates the counters table for the matched group by key, hour.
>> We tried using Increment, but discovered its very very slow.
>> Instead we've decided to update the counters upon compaction. We write the deltas into the same row-key, but a longer column qualifier: <RoundedToTheHourTS><Type><UniqueId>.
>> <Type> is: Delta or Aggregate.
>> Delta stands for a delta column qualifier we send from our client.
>>
>> in the preCompact, I create an InternalScanner which aggregates the delta column qualifier values and generates a new key value with Type Aggregate: <TS><A><UniqueID>
>>
>> The problem with this implementation that it consumes more memory.
>>
>> Now, I've tried avoiding the creation of the Aggregate type KV, by simply re-using the 1st delta column qualifier: simply changing its value in the KeyValue.
>> But from some reason, after a couple of minor / major compactions, I see data loss, when I count the values and compare them to the expected.
>>
>>
>> The question is: is it "legal" to change a KV I received from the InternalScanner before adding it the Result - i..e returning it from my own InternalScanner?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Feb 12, 2013, at 8:44 AM, Anoop Sam John wrote:
>>
>>> Asaf,
>>>         You have created a wrapper around the original InternalScanner instance created by the compaction flow?
>>>
>>>> Where do the KV generated during the compaction process queue up before being written to the disk? Is this buffer configurable?
>>> When I wrote the Region Observer my assumption was the the compaction process works in Streaming fashion, thus even if I decide to generate a KV per KV I see, it still shouldn't be a problem memory wise.
>>>
>>> There is no queuing. Your assumption is correct only. It is written to the writer as and when. (Just like how memstore flush doing the HFile write) As Lars said a look at your code can tell if some thing is going wrong.  Do you have blooms being used?
>>>
>>> -Anoop-
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Mesika, Asaf [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 11:16 AM
>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Subject: Custom preCompact RegionObserver crashes entire cluster on OOME: Heap Space
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I wrote a RegionObserver which does preCompact.
>>> I activated in pre-production, and then entire cluster dropped dead: One RegionServer after another crashed on OutOfMemoryException: Heap Space.
+
Ted Yu 2013-02-12, 16:00
+
Anoop Sam John 2013-02-13, 05:29
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB