Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
Sqoop >> mail # dev >> Version of future alpha release of Sqoop2


+
Jarek Jarcec Cecho 2012-10-12, 20:42
Copy link to this message
-
Re: Version of future alpha release of Sqoop2
Hi Jarcec,

I like your suggestion of 1.99.x. That seems intuitive and clear what it's
supposed to mean to me.

Thanks,
Cheolsoo

On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> Hi Sqoop(2) developers,
> we're making very good progress in Sqoop 2 land. Current code base still
> can't move any data around, but I'm sure that we're very close to have
> something usable and testable soon. With this regard, I would like to
> propose doing some
> pre/alpha/beta/unstable/preview/pick-your-own-word-for-unstable-code
> release as soon as possible to provide early adopters first testable bits.
> My motivation to provide early bits is to get feedback from actual users as
> soon as possible, so that we can incorporate good ideas before it will
> become too expensive.
>
> However releasing such early state raises question what version should we
> release. I would say that most simple idea is to release version "2.0.0",
> however due to unstable nature, I believe that it's very bad idea. Hadoop
> seems to be adding "-alpha" to the version names, for example
> "2.0.1-alpha"[1]. I don't quite like this solution as I would personally
> expect that there will be 2.0.1 stable (without "alpha" suffix) that won't
> have any new features but will be stable soon. As this won't be the case
> for Sqoop, I would like to propose slightly different solution that I've
> seen in some other projects. I would like to propose doing release 1.99.1.
> I believe that the version number implies that it's very far from current
> stable 1.4 version and very very near to 2.0, but it's not 2.0 yet. I would
> like to see other opinions about using 1.99.1 version for first cut of our
> Sqoop 2 branch.
>
> I actually did not invent this idea - I've seen in before. For example KDE
> project [2] is using very similar approach for quite some time by now as
> you can see on their archive [3]. Versions like 4.8.90 or 4.8.95 are
> "pre-releases" for 4.9. Another example would be Ubuntu one client [4].
>
> Jarcec
>
> Links:
> 1: http://mirror.nexcess.net/apache/hadoop/common/hadoop-2.0.1-alpha/
> 2: http://kde.org/
> 3: http://download.kde.org/unstable/
> 4: https://launchpad.net/ubuntuone-client/stable-4-0
>
+
Arvind Prabhakar 2012-10-23, 16:38
+
Jarek Jarcec Cecho 2012-10-26, 15:27
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB