Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
Accumulo, mail # dev - Accumulo feature freeze in 1 week


+
John Vines 2013-10-25, 16:33
+
Christopher 2013-10-25, 18:23
+
John Vines 2013-10-25, 18:49
+
Sean Busbey 2013-10-25, 19:11
+
Joey Echeverria 2013-10-25, 18:58
+
Josh Elser 2013-10-25, 19:15
+
Christopher 2013-10-25, 19:23
+
Sean Busbey 2013-10-25, 19:49
+
Josh Elser 2013-10-25, 19:53
+
Keith Turner 2013-10-25, 21:05
+
John Vines 2013-10-25, 21:08
Copy link to this message
-
Re: Accumulo feature freeze in 1 week
Keith Turner 2013-10-25, 21:40
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 5:08 PM, John Vines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I am concerned about the tickets around 118, as there seem to be a fair
> amount of blockers revolving around it. What's the status of those?
>

I am currently working through them.   Working on the garbage collector one
at the moment.
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Keith Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Josh Elser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Encryption (rest+motion), Conditional Mutations, Root tablet in its own
> > > table (instead of !METADATA), MiniAccumuloCluster improvements, Shell
> > > improvements (jcommander related), lots of other bug-fixes/improvements
> > and
> > > updates to recent Hadoop versions.
> > >
> >
> > Also ACCUMULO-118 and ACCUMULO-1451
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Those are what pop out at me.
> > >
> > >
> > > On 10/25/13 12:49 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> > >
> > >> Does anyone know off the top of their head the feature(s) that caused
> > 1.6
> > >> to be planned as a major release in the first place?
> > >>
> > >> I see ~180 resolved issues in jira, but we don't appear to have a
> > shortcut
> > >> for flagging things as breaking.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>  I don't mind putting things off to 1.7 (if necessary). But... if
> 1.6.0
> > >>> isn't sufficiently feature rich, there's not really a reason to
> > >>> release it just yet... until those features are ready. That said, I
> do
> > >>> think there'll be enough features in 1.6.0 to release it as a minor
> > >>> release, if we're interpreting the version as the standard
> > >>> <major>.<minor>.<bugfix> scheme, even if we end up pushing some stuff
> > >>> off to 1.7.
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Christopher L Tubbs II
> > >>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Josh Elser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> True, but at the same time it makes no sense to release 1.6.0 if the
> > >>>> features contained within are incomplete.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> There are still a number of blockers that are unresolved that would
> > all
> > >>>>
> > >>> fall
> > >>>
> > >>>> into the category of creating a broken 1.6.0 or having to back out
> > large
> > >>>> changesets. I know these blockers would be categorized as "bug
> fixes"
> > >>>> and
> > >>>> not "features", but some of these bugs are directly from new
> features
> > >>>>
> > >>> which
> > >>>
> > >>>> I would argue are thus still a part of this feature.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I'm all for trying to release early and often, but I will be the guy
> > who
> > >>>> throws a wrench in the works if we do it at the sake of reducing the
> > >>>>
> > >>> quality
> > >>>
> > >>>> of our release.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 10/25/13 11:49 AM, John Vines wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I'd rather not go down the slippery slope we went down last time.
> > I'll
> > >>>>> gladly be the bad guy and say that things are getting pushed to
> 1.7.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>  It looks like we're 50% in terms of tickets complete.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> http://s.apache.org/accumulo-**1.6.0-issues<
> > http://s.apache.org/accumulo-1.6.0-issues>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Extensions are always nice, but I'm not going to be the bad guy
> and
> > >>>>>> ask for one :)
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> --
> > >>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
> > >>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 12:33 PM, John Vines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Alright folks, we're down to the wire. Feature freeze is one week
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>> away.
> > >>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>> If
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> anyone has any last minute concerns about this schedule, please
> > speak
> > >>>>
+
dlmarion@... 2013-10-25, 21:37
+
John Vines 2013-10-25, 19:19
+
Sean Busbey 2013-10-25, 20:20
+
John Vines 2013-10-25, 20:26
+
John Vines 2013-10-26, 02:30
+
Steve Loughran 2013-10-28, 09:39
+
Billie Rinaldi 2013-10-28, 13:26