-Re: Maximum number of tables ?
Kevin O'dell 2012-07-13, 17:36
I just saw a system with 2500 Regions per RS(crazy I know, we are fixing
that). I did not think there was a hard coded limit...
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Amandeep Khurana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have come across clusters with 100s of tables but that typically is
> due to a sub optimal table design.
> The question here is - why do you need to distribute your data over
> lots of tables? What's your access pattern and what kind of data are
> you putting in? Or is this just a theoretical question?
> On Jul 13, 2012, at 12:05 AM, Adrien Mogenet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Hi there,
> > I read some good practices about number of columns / column families, but
> > nothing about the number of tables.
> > What if I need to spread my data among hundred or thousand (big) tables ?
> > What should I care about ? I guess I should keep a tight number of
> > storeFiles per RegionServer ?
> > --
> > Adrien Mogenet
> > http://www.mogenet.me
Customer Operations Engineer, Cloudera