Steve, is there a timeline all these changes will be ready? If it is not
going to be
ready soon, perhaps these changes could be consider for 1.3?
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Matt Foley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steve, I'm okay with this, but
> HADOOP-9258<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9258> is
> dependent on HADOOP-9265<
> which itself seems ready to commit. As I read the comments, both are ready
> to commit. Please let me know if this is correct.
> In meantime, I'm going to make the branch. We'll just have to commit to
> both branch-1 and branch-1.2.
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 1:29 AM, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On 6 March 2013 23:17, Matt Foley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi, I got stuck in other work and did not make the Hadoop 1.2 branch in
> > > February.
> > > Now that release 1.1.2 is out, I'm ready to make the 1.2 branch.
> > >
> > > I intend to branch for 1.2 in the next night or two, and at that point
> > will
> > > make the formal proposal
> > > to schedule an rc a week after that. If any issues, please let me
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > --Matt
> > >
> > I'd like to get my FS contract tests in there with the fixes for s3n and
> > to avoid data loss if you try to move a directory under itself.
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9258