Benjamin Reed
2011-02-08, 21:14
Mahadev Konar
2011-02-08, 21:31
Henry Robinson
2011-02-10, 07:55
Benjamin Reed
2011-02-17, 05:21
Flavio Junqueira
2011-02-17, 08:26
Benjamin Reed
2011-02-17, 14:54
Mahadev Konar
2011-02-17, 16:26
Benjamin Reed
2011-02-17, 17:34
Fournier, Camille F. [Tec...
2011-02-17, 18:11
-
[VOTE] Release plan for 3.3.3Benjamin Reed 2011-02-08, 21:14
i would like to propose that we do a 3.3.3 release based on the current
3.3 branch with myself, benjamin reed, as the release manager. that
branch has a critical bug fix (ZOOKEEPER-962) that we need to get out
asap. as per the bylaws, this vote will conclude in the next three days,
and if accepted, i plan to build the 3.3.3 release to be ready for a
vote on 2/14.
+1
ben
3.3 branch with myself, benjamin reed, as the release manager. that
branch has a critical bug fix (ZOOKEEPER-962) that we need to get out
asap. as per the bylaws, this vote will conclude in the next three days,
and if accepted, i plan to build the 3.3.3 release to be ready for a
vote on 2/14.
+1
ben
-
Re: [VOTE] Release plan for 3.3.3Mahadev Konar 2011-02-08, 21:31
+1. You could have used some phrases with your +1 so that folks
understood that you +1'ed your own proposal :).
thanks
mahadev
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Benjamin Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i would like to propose that we do a 3.3.3 release based on the current 3.3
> branch with myself, benjamin reed, as the release manager. that branch has a
> critical bug fix (ZOOKEEPER-962) that we need to get out asap. as per the
> bylaws, this vote will conclude in the next three days, and if accepted, i
> plan to build the 3.3.3 release to be ready for a vote on 2/14.
>
> +1
>
> ben
>
understood that you +1'ed your own proposal :).
thanks
mahadev
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Benjamin Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i would like to propose that we do a 3.3.3 release based on the current 3.3
> branch with myself, benjamin reed, as the release manager. that branch has a
> critical bug fix (ZOOKEEPER-962) that we need to get out asap. as per the
> bylaws, this vote will conclude in the next three days, and if accepted, i
> plan to build the 3.3.3 release to be ready for a vote on 2/14.
>
> +1
>
> ben
>
-
Re: [VOTE] Release plan for 3.3.3Henry Robinson 2011-02-10, 07:55
+1, thanks for taking the lead.
On 8 February 2011 13:31, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1. You could have used some phrases with your +1 so that folks
> understood that you +1'ed your own proposal :).
>
> thanks
> mahadev
>
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Benjamin Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > i would like to propose that we do a 3.3.3 release based on the current
> 3.3
> > branch with myself, benjamin reed, as the release manager. that branch
> has a
> > critical bug fix (ZOOKEEPER-962) that we need to get out asap. as per the
> > bylaws, this vote will conclude in the next three days, and if accepted,
> i
> > plan to build the 3.3.3 release to be ready for a vote on 2/14.
> >
> > +1
> >
> > ben
> >
>
--
Henry Robinson
Software Engineer
Cloudera
415-994-6679
On 8 February 2011 13:31, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1. You could have used some phrases with your +1 so that folks
> understood that you +1'ed your own proposal :).
>
> thanks
> mahadev
>
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Benjamin Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > i would like to propose that we do a 3.3.3 release based on the current
> 3.3
> > branch with myself, benjamin reed, as the release manager. that branch
> has a
> > critical bug fix (ZOOKEEPER-962) that we need to get out asap. as per the
> > bylaws, this vote will conclude in the next three days, and if accepted,
> i
> > plan to build the 3.3.3 release to be ready for a vote on 2/14.
> >
> > +1
> >
> > ben
> >
>
--
Henry Robinson
Software Engineer
Cloudera
415-994-6679
-
Re: [VOTE] Release plan for 3.3.3Benjamin Reed 2011-02-17, 05:21
ok, we have a lazy majority. i'll declare the vote as passed :)
i want to get this release out right away to get out the fix for the
major bug we resolved recently, so all of the bugs currently marked for
3.3.3 will not be included, although i really would like to get
ZOOKEEPER-960 in, but i don't really want to hold up the release. i'll
try to package something up by tomorrow.
ben
On 02/09/2011 11:55 PM, Henry Robinson wrote:
> +1, thanks for taking the lead.
>
> On 8 February 2011 13:31, Mahadev Konar<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> +1. You could have used some phrases with your +1 so that folks
>> understood that you +1'ed your own proposal :).
>>
>> thanks
>> mahadev
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Benjamin Reed<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> i would like to propose that we do a 3.3.3 release based on the current
>> 3.3
>>> branch with myself, benjamin reed, as the release manager. that branch
>> has a
>>> critical bug fix (ZOOKEEPER-962) that we need to get out asap. as per the
>>> bylaws, this vote will conclude in the next three days, and if accepted,
>> i
>>> plan to build the 3.3.3 release to be ready for a vote on 2/14.
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> ben
>>>
>
>
i want to get this release out right away to get out the fix for the
major bug we resolved recently, so all of the bugs currently marked for
3.3.3 will not be included, although i really would like to get
ZOOKEEPER-960 in, but i don't really want to hold up the release. i'll
try to package something up by tomorrow.
ben
On 02/09/2011 11:55 PM, Henry Robinson wrote:
> +1, thanks for taking the lead.
>
> On 8 February 2011 13:31, Mahadev Konar<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> +1. You could have used some phrases with your +1 so that folks
>> understood that you +1'ed your own proposal :).
>>
>> thanks
>> mahadev
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Benjamin Reed<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> i would like to propose that we do a 3.3.3 release based on the current
>> 3.3
>>> branch with myself, benjamin reed, as the release manager. that branch
>> has a
>>> critical bug fix (ZOOKEEPER-962) that we need to get out asap. as per the
>>> bylaws, this vote will conclude in the next three days, and if accepted,
>> i
>>> plan to build the 3.3.3 release to be ready for a vote on 2/14.
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> ben
>>>
>
>
-
Re: [VOTE] Release plan for 3.3.3Flavio Junqueira 2011-02-17, 08:26
-1. Your original proposal didn't suggest to discard all currently
marked 3.3.3. In fact, I'm not even sure how you'd do it given that I
think some have already been committed.
-Flavio
On Feb 17, 2011, at 6:21 AM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
> ok, we have a lazy majority. i'll declare the vote as passed :)
>
> i want to get this release out right away to get out the fix for the
> major bug we resolved recently, so all of the bugs currently marked
> for
> 3.3.3 will not be included, although i really would like to get
> ZOOKEEPER-960 in, but i don't really want to hold up the release. i'll
> try to package something up by tomorrow.
>
> ben
>
> On 02/09/2011 11:55 PM, Henry Robinson wrote:
>> +1, thanks for taking the lead.
>>
>> On 8 February 2011 13:31, Mahadev Konar<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> +1. You could have used some phrases with your +1 so that folks
>>> understood that you +1'ed your own proposal :).
>>>
>>> thanks
>>> mahadev
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Benjamin Reed<breed@yahoo-
>>> inc.com> wrote:
>>>> i would like to propose that we do a 3.3.3 release based on the
>>>> current
>>> 3.3
>>>> branch with myself, benjamin reed, as the release manager. that
>>>> branch
>>> has a
>>>> critical bug fix (ZOOKEEPER-962) that we need to get out asap. as
>>>> per the
>>>> bylaws, this vote will conclude in the next three days, and if
>>>> accepted,
>>> i
>>>> plan to build the 3.3.3 release to be ready for a vote on 2/14.
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> ben
>>>>
>>
>>
>
flavio
junqueira
research scientist
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
direct +34 93-183-8828
avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
phone (408) 349 3300 fax (408) 349 3301
marked 3.3.3. In fact, I'm not even sure how you'd do it given that I
think some have already been committed.
-Flavio
On Feb 17, 2011, at 6:21 AM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
> ok, we have a lazy majority. i'll declare the vote as passed :)
>
> i want to get this release out right away to get out the fix for the
> major bug we resolved recently, so all of the bugs currently marked
> for
> 3.3.3 will not be included, although i really would like to get
> ZOOKEEPER-960 in, but i don't really want to hold up the release. i'll
> try to package something up by tomorrow.
>
> ben
>
> On 02/09/2011 11:55 PM, Henry Robinson wrote:
>> +1, thanks for taking the lead.
>>
>> On 8 February 2011 13:31, Mahadev Konar<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> +1. You could have used some phrases with your +1 so that folks
>>> understood that you +1'ed your own proposal :).
>>>
>>> thanks
>>> mahadev
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Benjamin Reed<breed@yahoo-
>>> inc.com> wrote:
>>>> i would like to propose that we do a 3.3.3 release based on the
>>>> current
>>> 3.3
>>>> branch with myself, benjamin reed, as the release manager. that
>>>> branch
>>> has a
>>>> critical bug fix (ZOOKEEPER-962) that we need to get out asap. as
>>>> per the
>>>> bylaws, this vote will conclude in the next three days, and if
>>>> accepted,
>>> i
>>>> plan to build the 3.3.3 release to be ready for a vote on 2/14.
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> ben
>>>>
>>
>>
>
flavio
junqueira
research scientist
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
direct +34 93-183-8828
avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
phone (408) 349 3300 fax (408) 349 3301
-
Re: [VOTE] Release plan for 3.3.3Benjamin Reed 2011-02-17, 14:54
sorry, i meant to say open bugs. the plan is to cut a release based on
the current 3.3 branch.
ben
On 02/17/2011 12:26 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
> -1. Your original proposal didn't suggest to discard all currently
> marked 3.3.3. In fact, I'm not even sure how you'd do it given that I
> think some have already been committed.
>
> -Flavio
>
> On Feb 17, 2011, at 6:21 AM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
>
>> ok, we have a lazy majority. i'll declare the vote as passed :)
>>
>> i want to get this release out right away to get out the fix for the
>> major bug we resolved recently, so all of the bugs currently marked for
>> 3.3.3 will not be included, although i really would like to get
>> ZOOKEEPER-960 in, but i don't really want to hold up the release. i'll
>> try to package something up by tomorrow.
>>
>> ben
>>
>> On 02/09/2011 11:55 PM, Henry Robinson wrote:
>>> +1, thanks for taking the lead.
>>>
>>> On 8 February 2011 13:31, Mahadev Konar<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1. You could have used some phrases with your +1 so that folks
>>>> understood that you +1'ed your own proposal :).
>>>>
>>>> thanks
>>>> mahadev
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Benjamin Reed<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>>>> i would like to propose that we do a 3.3.3 release based on the
>>>>> current
>>>> 3.3
>>>>> branch with myself, benjamin reed, as the release manager. that branch
>>>> has a
>>>>> critical bug fix (ZOOKEEPER-962) that we need to get out asap. as
>>>>> per the
>>>>> bylaws, this vote will conclude in the next three days, and if
>>>>> accepted,
>>>> i
>>>>> plan to build the 3.3.3 release to be ready for a vote on 2/14.
>>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> ben
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> *flavio*
> *junqueira*
>
> research scientist
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> direct +34 93-183-8828
>
> avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
> phone (408) 349 3300fax (408) 349 3301
>
>
the current 3.3 branch.
ben
On 02/17/2011 12:26 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
> -1. Your original proposal didn't suggest to discard all currently
> marked 3.3.3. In fact, I'm not even sure how you'd do it given that I
> think some have already been committed.
>
> -Flavio
>
> On Feb 17, 2011, at 6:21 AM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
>
>> ok, we have a lazy majority. i'll declare the vote as passed :)
>>
>> i want to get this release out right away to get out the fix for the
>> major bug we resolved recently, so all of the bugs currently marked for
>> 3.3.3 will not be included, although i really would like to get
>> ZOOKEEPER-960 in, but i don't really want to hold up the release. i'll
>> try to package something up by tomorrow.
>>
>> ben
>>
>> On 02/09/2011 11:55 PM, Henry Robinson wrote:
>>> +1, thanks for taking the lead.
>>>
>>> On 8 February 2011 13:31, Mahadev Konar<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1. You could have used some phrases with your +1 so that folks
>>>> understood that you +1'ed your own proposal :).
>>>>
>>>> thanks
>>>> mahadev
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Benjamin Reed<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>>>> i would like to propose that we do a 3.3.3 release based on the
>>>>> current
>>>> 3.3
>>>>> branch with myself, benjamin reed, as the release manager. that branch
>>>> has a
>>>>> critical bug fix (ZOOKEEPER-962) that we need to get out asap. as
>>>>> per the
>>>>> bylaws, this vote will conclude in the next three days, and if
>>>>> accepted,
>>>> i
>>>>> plan to build the 3.3.3 release to be ready for a vote on 2/14.
>>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> ben
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> *flavio*
> *junqueira*
>
> research scientist
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> direct +34 93-183-8828
>
> avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
> phone (408) 349 3300fax (408) 349 3301
>
>
-
Re: [VOTE] Release plan for 3.3.3Mahadev Konar 2011-02-17, 16:26
Ben,
I am not sure, what you mean? Why not get the important ones in. I
will work on ZOOKEEPER-960 and will get them out by this weekend. But
I dont think we should call a release when we know there are something
we can get in the 3.3.3 release. Whats the reason for ignoring the
bugs filed for 3.3.3?
thanks
mahadev
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 6:54 AM, Benjamin Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sorry, i meant to say open bugs. the plan is to cut a release based on the
> current 3.3 branch.
>
> ben
>
> On 02/17/2011 12:26 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
>>
>> -1. Your original proposal didn't suggest to discard all currently marked
>> 3.3.3. In fact, I'm not even sure how you'd do it given that I think some
>> have already been committed.
>>
>> -Flavio
>>
>> On Feb 17, 2011, at 6:21 AM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
>>
>>> ok, we have a lazy majority. i'll declare the vote as passed :)
>>>
>>> i want to get this release out right away to get out the fix for the
>>> major bug we resolved recently, so all of the bugs currently marked for
>>> 3.3.3 will not be included, although i really would like to get
>>> ZOOKEEPER-960 in, but i don't really want to hold up the release. i'll
>>> try to package something up by tomorrow.
>>>
>>> ben
>>>
>>> On 02/09/2011 11:55 PM, Henry Robinson wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +1, thanks for taking the lead.
>>>>
>>>> On 8 February 2011 13:31, Mahadev Konar<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1. You could have used some phrases with your +1 so that folks
>>>>> understood that you +1'ed your own proposal :).
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks
>>>>> mahadev
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Benjamin Reed<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i would like to propose that we do a 3.3.3 release based on the
>>>>>> current
>>>>>
>>>>> 3.3
>>>>>>
>>>>>> branch with myself, benjamin reed, as the release manager. that branch
>>>>>
>>>>> has a
>>>>>>
>>>>>> critical bug fix (ZOOKEEPER-962) that we need to get out asap. as per
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> bylaws, this vote will conclude in the next three days, and if
>>>>>> accepted,
>>>>>
>>>>> i
>>>>>>
>>>>>> plan to build the 3.3.3 release to be ready for a vote on 2/14.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ben
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> *flavio*
>> *junqueira*
>>
>> research scientist
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> direct +34 93-183-8828
>>
>> avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
>> phone (408) 349 3300fax (408) 349 3301
>>
>>
>
>
I am not sure, what you mean? Why not get the important ones in. I
will work on ZOOKEEPER-960 and will get them out by this weekend. But
I dont think we should call a release when we know there are something
we can get in the 3.3.3 release. Whats the reason for ignoring the
bugs filed for 3.3.3?
thanks
mahadev
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 6:54 AM, Benjamin Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sorry, i meant to say open bugs. the plan is to cut a release based on the
> current 3.3 branch.
>
> ben
>
> On 02/17/2011 12:26 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
>>
>> -1. Your original proposal didn't suggest to discard all currently marked
>> 3.3.3. In fact, I'm not even sure how you'd do it given that I think some
>> have already been committed.
>>
>> -Flavio
>>
>> On Feb 17, 2011, at 6:21 AM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
>>
>>> ok, we have a lazy majority. i'll declare the vote as passed :)
>>>
>>> i want to get this release out right away to get out the fix for the
>>> major bug we resolved recently, so all of the bugs currently marked for
>>> 3.3.3 will not be included, although i really would like to get
>>> ZOOKEEPER-960 in, but i don't really want to hold up the release. i'll
>>> try to package something up by tomorrow.
>>>
>>> ben
>>>
>>> On 02/09/2011 11:55 PM, Henry Robinson wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +1, thanks for taking the lead.
>>>>
>>>> On 8 February 2011 13:31, Mahadev Konar<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1. You could have used some phrases with your +1 so that folks
>>>>> understood that you +1'ed your own proposal :).
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks
>>>>> mahadev
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Benjamin Reed<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i would like to propose that we do a 3.3.3 release based on the
>>>>>> current
>>>>>
>>>>> 3.3
>>>>>>
>>>>>> branch with myself, benjamin reed, as the release manager. that branch
>>>>>
>>>>> has a
>>>>>>
>>>>>> critical bug fix (ZOOKEEPER-962) that we need to get out asap. as per
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> bylaws, this vote will conclude in the next three days, and if
>>>>>> accepted,
>>>>>
>>>>> i
>>>>>>
>>>>>> plan to build the 3.3.3 release to be ready for a vote on 2/14.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ben
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> *flavio*
>> *junqueira*
>>
>> research scientist
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> direct +34 93-183-8828
>>
>> avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
>> phone (408) 349 3300fax (408) 349 3301
>>
>>
>
>
-
Re: [VOTE] Release plan for 3.3.3Benjamin Reed 2011-02-17, 17:34
in the plan I proposed we would get a release out this week. the last bug that went in was extremely severe and we should have had a release out weeks ago. I would much rather do a quick release to get the fix out and do another in a couple of weeks than delay this release.
ben
sent from my phone
----- Reply message -----
From: "Mahadev Konar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, Feb 17, 2011 8:27 am
Subject: [VOTE] Release plan for 3.3.3
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Benjamin Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ben,
I am not sure, what you mean? Why not get the important ones in. I
will work on ZOOKEEPER-960 and will get them out by this weekend. But
I dont think we should call a release when we know there are something
we can get in the 3.3.3 release. Whats the reason for ignoring the
bugs filed for 3.3.3?
thanks
mahadev
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 6:54 AM, Benjamin Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sorry, i meant to say open bugs. the plan is to cut a release based on the
> current 3.3 branch.
>
> ben
>
> On 02/17/2011 12:26 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
>>
>> -1. Your original proposal didn't suggest to discard all currently marked
>> 3.3.3. In fact, I'm not even sure how you'd do it given that I think some
>> have already been committed.
>>
>> -Flavio
>>
>> On Feb 17, 2011, at 6:21 AM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
>>
>>> ok, we have a lazy majority. i'll declare the vote as passed :)
>>>
>>> i want to get this release out right away to get out the fix for the
>>> major bug we resolved recently, so all of the bugs currently marked for
>>> 3.3.3 will not be included, although i really would like to get
>>> ZOOKEEPER-960 in, but i don't really want to hold up the release. i'll
>>> try to package something up by tomorrow.
>>>
>>> ben
>>>
>>> On 02/09/2011 11:55 PM, Henry Robinson wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +1, thanks for taking the lead.
>>>>
>>>> On 8 February 2011 13:31, Mahadev Konar<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1. You could have used some phrases with your +1 so that folks
>>>>> understood that you +1'ed your own proposal :).
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks
>>>>> mahadev
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Benjamin Reed<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i would like to propose that we do a 3.3.3 release based on the
>>>>>> current
>>>>>
>>>>> 3.3
>>>>>>
>>>>>> branch with myself, benjamin reed, as the release manager. that branch
>>>>>
>>>>> has a
>>>>>>
>>>>>> critical bug fix (ZOOKEEPER-962) that we need to get out asap. as per
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> bylaws, this vote will conclude in the next three days, and if
>>>>>> accepted,
>>>>>
>>>>> i
>>>>>>
>>>>>> plan to build the 3.3.3 release to be ready for a vote on 2/14.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ben
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> *flavio*
>> *junqueira*
>>
>> research scientist
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> direct +34 93-183-8828
>>
>> avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
>> phone (408) 349 3300fax (408) 349 3301
>>
>>
>
>
ben
sent from my phone
----- Reply message -----
From: "Mahadev Konar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, Feb 17, 2011 8:27 am
Subject: [VOTE] Release plan for 3.3.3
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Benjamin Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ben,
I am not sure, what you mean? Why not get the important ones in. I
will work on ZOOKEEPER-960 and will get them out by this weekend. But
I dont think we should call a release when we know there are something
we can get in the 3.3.3 release. Whats the reason for ignoring the
bugs filed for 3.3.3?
thanks
mahadev
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 6:54 AM, Benjamin Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sorry, i meant to say open bugs. the plan is to cut a release based on the
> current 3.3 branch.
>
> ben
>
> On 02/17/2011 12:26 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
>>
>> -1. Your original proposal didn't suggest to discard all currently marked
>> 3.3.3. In fact, I'm not even sure how you'd do it given that I think some
>> have already been committed.
>>
>> -Flavio
>>
>> On Feb 17, 2011, at 6:21 AM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
>>
>>> ok, we have a lazy majority. i'll declare the vote as passed :)
>>>
>>> i want to get this release out right away to get out the fix for the
>>> major bug we resolved recently, so all of the bugs currently marked for
>>> 3.3.3 will not be included, although i really would like to get
>>> ZOOKEEPER-960 in, but i don't really want to hold up the release. i'll
>>> try to package something up by tomorrow.
>>>
>>> ben
>>>
>>> On 02/09/2011 11:55 PM, Henry Robinson wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +1, thanks for taking the lead.
>>>>
>>>> On 8 February 2011 13:31, Mahadev Konar<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1. You could have used some phrases with your +1 so that folks
>>>>> understood that you +1'ed your own proposal :).
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks
>>>>> mahadev
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Benjamin Reed<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i would like to propose that we do a 3.3.3 release based on the
>>>>>> current
>>>>>
>>>>> 3.3
>>>>>>
>>>>>> branch with myself, benjamin reed, as the release manager. that branch
>>>>>
>>>>> has a
>>>>>>
>>>>>> critical bug fix (ZOOKEEPER-962) that we need to get out asap. as per
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> bylaws, this vote will conclude in the next three days, and if
>>>>>> accepted,
>>>>>
>>>>> i
>>>>>>
>>>>>> plan to build the 3.3.3 release to be ready for a vote on 2/14.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ben
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> *flavio*
>> *junqueira*
>>
>> research scientist
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> direct +34 93-183-8828
>>
>> avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
>> phone (408) 349 3300fax (408) 349 3301
>>
>>
>
>
-
RE: [VOTE] Release plan for 3.3.3Fournier, Camille F. [Tec... 2011-02-17, 18:11
I strongly second this.
-----Original Message-----
From: Benjamin Reed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 12:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release plan for 3.3.3
in the plan I proposed we would get a release out this week. the last bug that went in was extremely severe and we should have had a release out weeks ago. I would much rather do a quick release to get the fix out and do another in a couple of weeks than delay this release.
ben
sent from my phone
----- Reply message -----
From: "Mahadev Konar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, Feb 17, 2011 8:27 am
Subject: [VOTE] Release plan for 3.3.3
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Benjamin Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ben,
I am not sure, what you mean? Why not get the important ones in. I
will work on ZOOKEEPER-960 and will get them out by this weekend. But
I dont think we should call a release when we know there are something
we can get in the 3.3.3 release. Whats the reason for ignoring the
bugs filed for 3.3.3?
thanks
mahadev
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 6:54 AM, Benjamin Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sorry, i meant to say open bugs. the plan is to cut a release based on the
> current 3.3 branch.
>
> ben
>
> On 02/17/2011 12:26 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
>>
>> -1. Your original proposal didn't suggest to discard all currently marked
>> 3.3.3. In fact, I'm not even sure how you'd do it given that I think some
>> have already been committed.
>>
>> -Flavio
>>
>> On Feb 17, 2011, at 6:21 AM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
>>
>>> ok, we have a lazy majority. i'll declare the vote as passed :)
>>>
>>> i want to get this release out right away to get out the fix for the
>>> major bug we resolved recently, so all of the bugs currently marked for
>>> 3.3.3 will not be included, although i really would like to get
>>> ZOOKEEPER-960 in, but i don't really want to hold up the release. i'll
>>> try to package something up by tomorrow.
>>>
>>> ben
>>>
>>> On 02/09/2011 11:55 PM, Henry Robinson wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +1, thanks for taking the lead.
>>>>
>>>> On 8 February 2011 13:31, Mahadev Konar<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1. You could have used some phrases with your +1 so that folks
>>>>> understood that you +1'ed your own proposal :).
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks
>>>>> mahadev
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Benjamin Reed<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i would like to propose that we do a 3.3.3 release based on the
>>>>>> current
>>>>>
>>>>> 3.3
>>>>>>
>>>>>> branch with myself, benjamin reed, as the release manager. that branch
>>>>>
>>>>> has a
>>>>>>
>>>>>> critical bug fix (ZOOKEEPER-962) that we need to get out asap. as per
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> bylaws, this vote will conclude in the next three days, and if
>>>>>> accepted,
>>>>>
>>>>> i
>>>>>>
>>>>>> plan to build the 3.3.3 release to be ready for a vote on 2/14.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ben
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> *flavio*
>> *junqueira*
>>
>> research scientist
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> direct +34 93-183-8828
>>
>> avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
>> phone (408) 349 3300fax (408) 349 3301
>>
>>
>
>
-----Original Message-----
From: Benjamin Reed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 12:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release plan for 3.3.3
in the plan I proposed we would get a release out this week. the last bug that went in was extremely severe and we should have had a release out weeks ago. I would much rather do a quick release to get the fix out and do another in a couple of weeks than delay this release.
ben
sent from my phone
----- Reply message -----
From: "Mahadev Konar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, Feb 17, 2011 8:27 am
Subject: [VOTE] Release plan for 3.3.3
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Benjamin Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ben,
I am not sure, what you mean? Why not get the important ones in. I
will work on ZOOKEEPER-960 and will get them out by this weekend. But
I dont think we should call a release when we know there are something
we can get in the 3.3.3 release. Whats the reason for ignoring the
bugs filed for 3.3.3?
thanks
mahadev
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 6:54 AM, Benjamin Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sorry, i meant to say open bugs. the plan is to cut a release based on the
> current 3.3 branch.
>
> ben
>
> On 02/17/2011 12:26 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
>>
>> -1. Your original proposal didn't suggest to discard all currently marked
>> 3.3.3. In fact, I'm not even sure how you'd do it given that I think some
>> have already been committed.
>>
>> -Flavio
>>
>> On Feb 17, 2011, at 6:21 AM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
>>
>>> ok, we have a lazy majority. i'll declare the vote as passed :)
>>>
>>> i want to get this release out right away to get out the fix for the
>>> major bug we resolved recently, so all of the bugs currently marked for
>>> 3.3.3 will not be included, although i really would like to get
>>> ZOOKEEPER-960 in, but i don't really want to hold up the release. i'll
>>> try to package something up by tomorrow.
>>>
>>> ben
>>>
>>> On 02/09/2011 11:55 PM, Henry Robinson wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +1, thanks for taking the lead.
>>>>
>>>> On 8 February 2011 13:31, Mahadev Konar<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1. You could have used some phrases with your +1 so that folks
>>>>> understood that you +1'ed your own proposal :).
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks
>>>>> mahadev
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Benjamin Reed<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i would like to propose that we do a 3.3.3 release based on the
>>>>>> current
>>>>>
>>>>> 3.3
>>>>>>
>>>>>> branch with myself, benjamin reed, as the release manager. that branch
>>>>>
>>>>> has a
>>>>>>
>>>>>> critical bug fix (ZOOKEEPER-962) that we need to get out asap. as per
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> bylaws, this vote will conclude in the next three days, and if
>>>>>> accepted,
>>>>>
>>>>> i
>>>>>>
>>>>>> plan to build the 3.3.3 release to be ready for a vote on 2/14.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ben
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> *flavio*
>> *junqueira*
>>
>> research scientist
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> direct +34 93-183-8828
>>
>> avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
>> phone (408) 349 3300fax (408) 349 3301
>>
>>
>
>
