Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Accumulo >> mail # user >> Accumulo + OODBMS = ?


Copy link to this message
-
Re: Accumulo + OODBMS = ?
Such a thing might be possible, but I don't think anyone on the accumulo team is very familiar with OODBMSs - can you recommend some resources to get caught up?

I have, in the past, prototyped an implementation of a object mapping for Accumulo similar to that provided in Google's AppEngine. It allows users to define subclasses of a Model class whose fields can be serialized to the database and retrieved via a simple query language.

But if the intent of an OODBMS is to use the database to follow object references, I don't think anyone has attempted grafting such functionality over Accumulo yet, but it would be an interesting exercise to try to do so.

On Jan 24, 2012, at 8:55 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:

> Once upon a time, a long, long time ago, I was one of the implementors
> of ObjectStore, now a product of Progress Software. I found myself
> musing this morning about the possible intersection of giant scale and
> OODBMS. Have any of you 'accumul-ators' considered some sort of object
> mapping scheme? Or is there one that I've been too obtuse to notice?
> Or is it just a dumb idea?
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB