+
Lars George 2012-06-26, 18:27
-
RE: No autoflush from table within coprocessor?Anoop Sam John 2012-06-27, 04:57
Hi Lars
autoFlush will be having a default value true right? On HTable this can be set as false using the setAutoFlush() API. But the CoprocessorEnvironment.getTable() returns HTableInterface type with object as a wrapper around the actual HTable. So here the underlying table will be having autoflush=true. This seems ok right?
-Anoop-
________________________________________
From: Lars George [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 11:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: No autoflush from table within coprocessor?
Hi,
Did anyone else observe the need to call flushCommits() from a table retrieved by the CoprocessorEnvironment.getTable() call? Looking at the code, it should also have autoFlush set to "true", but it does not seem to honor that?
Lars
autoFlush will be having a default value true right? On HTable this can be set as false using the setAutoFlush() API. But the CoprocessorEnvironment.getTable() returns HTableInterface type with object as a wrapper around the actual HTable. So here the underlying table will be having autoflush=true. This seems ok right?
-Anoop-
________________________________________
From: Lars George [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 11:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: No autoflush from table within coprocessor?
Hi,
Did anyone else observe the need to call flushCommits() from a table retrieved by the CoprocessorEnvironment.getTable() call? Looking at the code, it should also have autoFlush set to "true", but it does not seem to honor that?
Lars
