Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
HDFS, mail # dev - VOTE: HDFS-347 merge


Copy link to this message
-
Re: VOTE: HDFS-347 merge
Eli Collins 2013-02-26, 00:39
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Suresh Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ATM's suggestion of removing HDFS-2246 in trunk, but not branch-2, is
>> a rational compromise: it allows some period for others to adapt, but
>> not an indefinite one. It's not clear what you're proposing, if
>> anything.
>>
>
>
>
> I am not sure why a release that supports both these is such a bad idea.
> As Nicholas has stated these mechanisms are not mutually exclusive.
> I am -1 on removing HDFS-2246. That should be done in a separate jira
> and not as a part of HDFS-347. If the concern is the complexity, I have
> already suggested some choices on how to simplify it. If maintaining the
> code
> is a concern, I have also offered to support and maintain it.

There's no reason to maintain multiple implementations of the same
feature, that's why per the 2246 jira it was proposed as a "good short
term solution till HDFS-347 is completed".   Why is ATM's compromise
unacceptable?