Christophe Taton 2013-04-05, 18:19
Stack 2013-04-05, 22:05
lars hofhansl 2013-04-05, 22:28
Varun Sharma 2013-04-06, 00:25
Ted Yu 2013-04-06, 13:53
Ted, should we have such test in the test suite? If so, should a JIRA
be opened for that?
2013/4/6 Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> HBASE-5257 has been integrated into 0.94
> Can you try 0.94.6.1 to see if the problem is solved ?
> Writing a unit test probably is the easiest way for validation.
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Varun Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> HBASE 5257 is probably what lars is talking about - that fixed a bug with
>> version tracking on ColumnPaginatinoFilter - there is a patch for 0.92,
>> 0.94 and 0.96 but not for the cdh versions...
>> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 3:28 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Normally Filters are evaluated before the version counting. There was
>> > issue that was fixed recently that changed this behavior specifically for
>> > ColumnPaginationFilters and friend... Lemme see if I can find that.
>> > ________________________________
>> > From: Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > To: Hbase-User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > Sent: Friday, April 5, 2013 3:05 PM
>> > Subject: Re: Interactions between max versions and filters
>> > On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Christophe Taton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > >wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > Is there an explicit specification of the behavior of max versions (set
>> > in
>> > > a get/scan) when combined with filters?
>> > > From my experiments (with 0.92 CDH4.1.2), the max versions is applied
>> > a
>> > > way that is neither pre-filtering nor post-filtering.
>> > > In particular, I am currently playing with the ColumnPaginationFilter,
>> > and
>> > > I am not entirely certain I understand the intended/expected behavior.
>> > > I also did not find an explicit specification in the reference user
>> > > nor in the API javadoc.
>> > >
>> > Hey Christophe:
>> > Sounds like a bug. My understanding is that the regardless of filters,
>> > versions should be respected (Yes, we should have a specification but we
>> > not have one here).
>> > Yours,
>> > St.Ack
Ted Yu 2013-04-06, 14:10
Varun Sharma 2013-04-06, 19:55
Christophe Taton 2013-04-09, 17:57
Christophe Taton 2013-04-05, 22:22