Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Accumulo >> mail # dev >> Re: [VOTE] JDK 1.7 - Switch for Accumulo 1.6.0


Copy link to this message
-
Re: [VOTE] JDK 1.7 - Switch for Accumulo 1.6.0
+1

--Jason

sent from my DROID
On Jun 5, 2013 6:10 PM, "John Vines" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> -1 then
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The vote was already called, and it was a vote on whether we should do
> > it now (now, as in for Accumulo 1.6.0 development). If you think more
> > time is needed, then your vote should be no. I don't think it's
> > productive to continue to have a meta-discussion about whether or not
> > a discussion/vote should occur. Just vote "-1", with a reason "not
> > enough time to address potential concerns".
> >
> > --
> > Christopher L Tubbs II
> > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 2:14 PM, John Vines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Given this thread, I think more discussion is necessary before a vote.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> All-
> > >>
> > >> Please explicitly vote in favor or against changing the java
> > >> dependency to >=1.7.
> > >>
> > >> Parsing vague "may cause..." or "might be..." concerns throughout the
> > >> text of the thread is tedious, and does not help me know what the
> > >> consensus of the group is, so we can move forward. If there's a
> > >> specific issue that is informing your vote, that's great, feel free to
> > >> state it, but I don't want this issue to drag out for the duration of
> > >> the the Accumulo 1.6.0 development cycle because people are reluctant
> > >> to come to a concrete opinion.
> > >>
> > >> If it fails a vote, we'll revisit for Accumulo 1.7.0.
> > >>
> > >> I'm personally in favor of the change (+1), but it's not a big deal to
> > >> me. I just want a concrete resolution.
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Christopher L Tubbs II
> > >> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 10:51 AM, John Vines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> > I have also heard mulling about issues with the way Kerberos
> > >> authentication
> > >> > behaves with JDK1.7 for hadoop. This may also have implications on
> the
> > >> > Accumulo implementation as well.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Sean Busbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Ben Popp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> >> <snip>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > CDH4 claims JDK 1.6 and 1.7 support:
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >>
> > >>
> >
> http://www.cloudera.com/content/cloudera-content/cloudera-docs/CDH4/latest/CDH4-Requirements-and-Supported-Versions/cdhrsv_topic_3.html
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > <snip>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> CDH4 comes with some additional caveats about 1.7:
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >>
> >
> http://www.cloudera.com/content/cloudera-content/cloudera-docs/CDH4/latest/CDH4-Release-Notes/cdh4rn_topic_2_2.html?scroll=concept_c1n_bln_tj_unique_1
> > >> >>
> > >> >> The biggest one being the disclaimer about 1.7 compiled code.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> --
> > >> >> Sean
> > >> >>
> > >>
> >
>
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB