Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Accumulo, mail # dev - Re: [VOTE] JDK 1.7 - Switch for Accumulo 1.6.0


Copy link to this message
-
Re: [VOTE] JDK 1.7 - Switch for Accumulo 1.6.0
Jason Trost 2013-06-05, 22:48
+1

--Jason

sent from my DROID
On Jun 5, 2013 6:10 PM, "John Vines" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> -1 then
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The vote was already called, and it was a vote on whether we should do
> > it now (now, as in for Accumulo 1.6.0 development). If you think more
> > time is needed, then your vote should be no. I don't think it's
> > productive to continue to have a meta-discussion about whether or not
> > a discussion/vote should occur. Just vote "-1", with a reason "not
> > enough time to address potential concerns".
> >
> > --
> > Christopher L Tubbs II
> > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 2:14 PM, John Vines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Given this thread, I think more discussion is necessary before a vote.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> All-
> > >>
> > >> Please explicitly vote in favor or against changing the java
> > >> dependency to >=1.7.
> > >>
> > >> Parsing vague "may cause..." or "might be..." concerns throughout the
> > >> text of the thread is tedious, and does not help me know what the
> > >> consensus of the group is, so we can move forward. If there's a
> > >> specific issue that is informing your vote, that's great, feel free to
> > >> state it, but I don't want this issue to drag out for the duration of
> > >> the the Accumulo 1.6.0 development cycle because people are reluctant
> > >> to come to a concrete opinion.
> > >>
> > >> If it fails a vote, we'll revisit for Accumulo 1.7.0.
> > >>
> > >> I'm personally in favor of the change (+1), but it's not a big deal to
> > >> me. I just want a concrete resolution.
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Christopher L Tubbs II
> > >> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 10:51 AM, John Vines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> > I have also heard mulling about issues with the way Kerberos
> > >> authentication
> > >> > behaves with JDK1.7 for hadoop. This may also have implications on
> the
> > >> > Accumulo implementation as well.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Sean Busbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Ben Popp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> >> <snip>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > CDH4 claims JDK 1.6 and 1.7 support:
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >>
> > >>
> >
> http://www.cloudera.com/content/cloudera-content/cloudera-docs/CDH4/latest/CDH4-Requirements-and-Supported-Versions/cdhrsv_topic_3.html
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > <snip>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> CDH4 comes with some additional caveats about 1.7:
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >>
> >
> http://www.cloudera.com/content/cloudera-content/cloudera-docs/CDH4/latest/CDH4-Release-Notes/cdh4rn_topic_2_2.html?scroll=concept_c1n_bln_tj_unique_1
> > >> >>
> > >> >> The biggest one being the disclaimer about 1.7 compiled code.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> --
> > >> >> Sean
> > >> >>
> > >>
> >
>