-Re: [DISCUSS] patch format
Jarek Jarcec Cecho 2012-10-16, 00:38
I have similar opinion that I do not much care. However I tent to not use --no-prefix as it means less typing for me. But I'm good with both options.
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 05:34:20PM -0700, Mike Percy wrote:
> I don't have a strong preference, as long as it works with Review Board I'm
> fine with doing whatever.
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Brock Noland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Traditionally as a project we have generated patches with --no-prefix.
> > As Mike said on ReviewBoard:
> > "--no-prefix used to be required to generate a patch that was
> > compatible with both Subversion and Git, but since we have switched
> > over to using only Git it should not be necessary anymore. Still, I've
> > regenerated the patch with --no-prefix."
> > As a project should we switch over to the default git prefix? I am
> > fine with the current scenario or using a prefix, I'd just like us to
> > be consistent.
> > Brock