Ishan Chhabra 2013-08-15, 08:31
Ted Yu 2013-08-15, 08:42
-Re: Scanners with little matching data
Nicolas Liochon 2013-08-15, 14:31
It's not uncommon to bump these values to something like 5 minutes, for the
exact reason you mention.
The obvious impact is that if the clients don't close the connections the
server will have to keep the resources. It's usually manageable.
Another one is that if the machine running the server dies silently (i.e.
the process is not killed but the machine stops responding) the client will
wait until the timeout is reached. On 0.96 this is covered by HBASE-7590:
the connection will be cut whatever the timeout. It's not available on the
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Ishan Chhabra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> i have a mapreduce job that reads data from hbase. To minimize data
> transfer, i have implemented a filter that aggressively filters out data to
> be sent back. Now, I am running into a situation where the scanner doesn't
> send back anything for the rpc.timwout value, and the client times out,
> retries, and repeats. My tasks fail in the initialize phase itself because
> it gets stuck in this loop for 10 minutes and then gives up.
> I am currently running with hbase.rpc.timeout and
> hbase.regionserver.lease.period as 120s. I can increase this further, but
> want to understand the cons of doing that first.
> Also, is there any other way of getting around this?
> *Ishan Chhabra *| Rocket Scientist | RocketFuel Inc.**