ranjith raghunath 2012-12-04, 04:06
Jarek Jarcec Cecho 2012-12-04, 05:35
ranjith raghunath 2012-12-04, 13:00
I've actually google for some way to specify schema in JDBC URL prior working on SQOOP-601 and SQOOP-540. I do vaguely remember that I found similar property, but it simply did not worked for me on recent versions. Please don't hesitate and let me know if you will have more luck!
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 07:00:19AM -0600, ranjith raghunath wrote:
> Appreciate the response Jarek. Thanks for mentioning this as it was driving
> me nuts.
> What about using parameters in the jdbc url? I have noticed that for DB2
> (per a "how to" through google) it seems that this may work, --connect
> "jdbc:db2://192.168.1.3:50001/sample:currentSchema=DB2INST1;". I am using
> the db2jcc4.jar. However, I have not have had any luck with that.
> I guess what I am really asking is if there is a way around this without
> building sqoop from trunk. And have any of you had any success with that
> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > Hi Ranjith,
> > parameter --table is meant to be used for table name only. It do not
> > support custom scheme unfortunately.
> > We've just recently added support for custom schemes for PostreSQL
> > (SQOOP-601) and Microsoft SQL (SQOOP-540). Unfortunately both issues are
> > available only on trunk and are not part of any release yet. But hey, you
> > can always build your own Sqoop from the trunk!
> > Jarcec
> > On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 10:06:20PM -0600, ranjith raghunath wrote:
> > > I apologize if this question has already been asked before. I am using
> > > sqoop to import data from a SQL Server/DB2/Postgres database. Is there a
> > > known issue with using schame.table in the --table parameter?
> > >
> > > Any help will be appreciated.
> > >
> > > Thanks
ranjith raghunath 2012-12-04, 17:08