Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Accumulo >> mail # dev >> Releasing 1.5


Copy link to this message
-
Re: Releasing 1.5
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 1:35 PM, John Vines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I had issues running a hadoop2 compiled version of accumulo against CDH4, I
> can't remember the specifics of it though.
>

I would hope that would be due to Hadoop 2's alpha state.  I guess we'll
have to wait and see.
>
> When I said specialized packaging, I was thinking of a naming convention to
> distinguish hadoop1 vs. hadoop2 ( vs. vendor-specific hadoop) compiled
> jars.
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Billie Rinaldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure we are talking about actual vendor-specific code.  We are
> > deciding whether or not to create additional release tarballs that have
> > been compiled against various vendors' Hadoop-compatible file systems.
> > Assuming that we determine there is nothing prohibiting us from doing
> this,
> > I think it would simply be up to the release manager (i.e. anyone who
> > assembles a release and calls a vote for it).  If someone cares enough
> > about a particular distribution to build and create an extra tarball,
> they
> > can.  However, I don't think this is common for Apache projects --
> > additional packaging is usually left to supporting companies.  I haven't
> > even noticed any releases yet that come in Hadoop 1 and Hadoop 2 flavors.
> >
> > I haven't heard (until now) that Accumulo compiled against an appropriate
> > version of Apache Hadoop will not work with CDH, but John says that's the
> > case.  John, have you tried this?  Also, what is the "specialized
> > packaging" you referred to?
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:32 PM, David Medinets
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> >
> > > Does it make sense to put vendor-specific stuff under a
> contribs/vendors
> > > directory? Doing so would certainly indicate that we are
> vendor-agnostic.
> > > And give vendors an obvious place to contribute.
> > >
> >
>