Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Accumulo >> mail # dev >> Releasing 1.5


Copy link to this message
-
Re: Releasing 1.5
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 1:35 PM, John Vines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I had issues running a hadoop2 compiled version of accumulo against CDH4, I
> can't remember the specifics of it though.
>

I would hope that would be due to Hadoop 2's alpha state.  I guess we'll
have to wait and see.
>
> When I said specialized packaging, I was thinking of a naming convention to
> distinguish hadoop1 vs. hadoop2 ( vs. vendor-specific hadoop) compiled
> jars.
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Billie Rinaldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure we are talking about actual vendor-specific code.  We are
> > deciding whether or not to create additional release tarballs that have
> > been compiled against various vendors' Hadoop-compatible file systems.
> > Assuming that we determine there is nothing prohibiting us from doing
> this,
> > I think it would simply be up to the release manager (i.e. anyone who
> > assembles a release and calls a vote for it).  If someone cares enough
> > about a particular distribution to build and create an extra tarball,
> they
> > can.  However, I don't think this is common for Apache projects --
> > additional packaging is usually left to supporting companies.  I haven't
> > even noticed any releases yet that come in Hadoop 1 and Hadoop 2 flavors.
> >
> > I haven't heard (until now) that Accumulo compiled against an appropriate
> > version of Apache Hadoop will not work with CDH, but John says that's the
> > case.  John, have you tried this?  Also, what is the "specialized
> > packaging" you referred to?
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:32 PM, David Medinets
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> >
> > > Does it make sense to put vendor-specific stuff under a
> contribs/vendors
> > > directory? Doing so would certainly indicate that we are
> vendor-agnostic.
> > > And give vendors an obvious place to contribute.
> > >
> >
>
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB