Jonathan Hsieh 2013-02-12, 22:12
lars hofhansl 2013-02-12, 23:42
Ted Yu 2013-02-13, 00:59
Jonathan Hsieh 2013-02-13, 01:30
Jonathan Hsieh 2013-02-12, 23:45
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-02-12, 22:19
Ted Yu 2013-02-12, 22:23
Jonathan Hsieh 2013-02-12, 22:27
Ted Yu 2013-02-12, 23:28
Andrew Purtell 2013-02-13, 00:40
Stack 2013-02-13, 06:41
Jonathan Hsieh 2013-02-14, 14:44
We've got 4 +1's (jmhsieh, stack, tedyu, mbertozzi) on merging the
hbase-7290v2 svn branch into trunk. I'll be merging it into trunk later
tonight, and any follow on issues will be dealt with there.
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Jonathan Hsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey all,
> I've successfully ported the git repo to an svn branch. The branch is
> called hbase-7290v2 (I made some mistakes on v1). Here's a link to
> what the svn snapshots repo looks like:
> This is the official branch now -- we'll now commit fixes from the
> pre-trunk-merge mega-patch reviews to that branch. Note that the
> branch has also been straightened so that only merges from trunk come
> in (on in branch merges). Because the svn branch is now the official
> branch, I've made my personal repo at https://github.com/jmhsieh/hbase
> read-only by others again.
> You can see from the current jmhsieh/snapshots github branch, I merged
> it with the apache svn (from 2/1/13, and soon to be updated with 2/12
> and 2/14 merges), and they are identical (modulo some commit message
> fixes). I will likely merge from trunk every other day or so to keep
> it up with trunk until the merge to trunk goes through.
> Almost there!
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I took a quick look at the megapatch attached to hbase-7290. Added some
> > minor remarks to the issue.
> > +1 on commit as long as hadoopqa is green (caveat the flakies).
> > St.Ack
> > On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Hey all,
> >> We did a branch merge of the snapshot branch (hbase-6055 and
> >> hbase-7290 combined) with trunk on 2/1/13. This merge initially had
> >> several always broken tests but since then Ted, Matteo and myself
> >> fixed all the always-broken unit tests. I've merged again today
> >> 2/12/13 , and posted a patch on HBASE-7290 for the hadoopqa bot to
> >> run.
> >> There are primarily four of us who worked on this branch -- Jesse Y,
> >> Matteo, Ted Yu and myself, so if we each +1, technically we would have
> >> the 3 +1's required and could merge. I wanted to solicit +1's from
> >> the four who worked on it (all committers now) and also find out if
> >> anyone else has started reviewing the code or intends to in the next
> >> few days. It is a large patch (1.3MB) that I can post on review
> >> board, but it may be easier to understand by going to the different
> >> individual jiras (some of which have design docs). Generally we've
> >> been using a looser of review then commit for each of the subtasks. If
> >> I get clean test runs from the QA bot and +1's from the folks who
> >> worked on it or planned on reviewing it, I'd like merge sooner rather
> >> than later.
> >> On the unit testing front, I've personally gotten one error-free unit
> >> tests runs runs and one with a failure in hbase-examples:
> >> On the system testing side, I've been testing the pre-merge version
> >> outlined by Aleks  and it had been fairly robust on a 5 node
> >> cluster with fault injection. I've also done some testing on a 20
> >> node cluster (no fault injection) and a few runs on a 100 node cluster
> >> where the snapshoting feature has been robust.
> >> Thanks,
> >> Jon.
> >>  https://github.com/jmhsieh/hbase/tree/snapshot-merge-0212
> >>  http://markmail.org/message/pdbkq654ipuxyt6a
> >> --
> >> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> >> // Software Engineer, Cloudera
> >> // [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> // Software Engineer, Cloudera
> // [EMAIL PROTECTED]
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// Software Engineer, Cloudera
// [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jesse Yates 2013-02-20, 21:50
Lars Hofhansl 2013-02-13, 04:00