Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
HBase >> mail # dev >> [VOTE] The 1st hbase-0.96.0 release candidate is available for download


+
Stack 2013-08-31, 03:35
+
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-08-31, 11:15
+
Devaraj Das 2013-08-31, 18:23
+
Stack 2013-08-31, 22:17
+
Enis Söztutar 2013-08-31, 22:16
+
Stack 2013-08-31, 22:13
+
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-09-02, 16:41
+
Stack 2013-09-02, 17:00
+
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-09-02, 17:20
+
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-09-02, 17:51
+
Stack 2013-09-03, 13:06
+
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-09-03, 13:57
+
Elliott Clark 2013-09-03, 19:56
+
Devaraj Das 2013-09-03, 20:19
+
Devaraj Das 2013-09-04, 01:17
+
Devaraj Das 2013-09-04, 01:30
+
Elliott Clark 2013-09-04, 03:31
+
Stack 2013-09-04, 00:09
+
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-09-04, 02:35
+
Stack 2013-09-05, 00:34
+
Elliott Clark 2013-09-06, 20:42
+
Stack 2013-09-07, 08:19
+
Nicolas Liochon 2013-09-09, 17:34
+
Jonathan Hsieh 2013-09-09, 20:45
+
Stack 2013-09-09, 21:24
+
Enis Söztutar 2013-09-09, 21:11
+
Nick Dimiduk 2013-09-09, 17:33
+
Stack 2013-09-11, 17:19
+
Devaraj Das 2013-09-11, 17:51
Copy link to this message
-
Re: [VOTE] The 1st hbase-0.96.0 release candidate is available for download
HBASE-9496 needs to be in imho, we need to keep compatible APIs. Let me
start on it today.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Devaraj Das <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> In my tests, I couldn't (yet) reproduce the dataloss problem, but I
> ran into assignment manager issues (mentioned in HBASE-9338) and all
> except one has been committed. Could we please hold on until that last
> one is committed (HBASE-9480).
>
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am going to roll a new RC.  The hbase-it dataloss problem has been
> > figured as an issue in the test harness (details to follow).  Any items
> > folks want to be sure make the next RC?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > St.Ack
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> hbase-0.96.0  will be our next major release.  It is intended to
> supplant
> >> the 0.94.x series.
> >>
> >> hbase-0.96.0RC0 is our first candidate for release hbase-0.96.0.
> >>
> >> The signed tarballs are available here:
> >>
> >>  http://people.apache.org/~stack/0.96.0RC0/
> >>
> >> The hbase built against hadoop1 artifacts are here:
> >>
> >>  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-126/
> >>
> >> The hbase built against hadoop2 artifacts are here:
> >>
> >>  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-127/
> >>
> >> Note that hbase-0.96.0 comes in two flavors; a build that includes and
> >> runs on hadoop-1.x and another for hadoop-2.x.  You must chose the hbase
> >> that suits your hadoop context.
> >>
> >> Almost 2k issues [1] are attributed to this version (counting fixes done
> >> against this and the 0.95.x developer series of releases).  Almost 100
> >> fixes have been committed since 0.95.2.  I will follow up w/ a synopsis
> of
> >> the major changes.
> >>
> >> Please take it for a spin.  We are interested in any issues found but in
> >> particular, we would appreciate feedback on how well the migration of a
> >> 0.94.x dataset to run under 0.96.0 works [2].
> >>
> >> Should this candidate become hbase-0.96.0?  Please vote +/-1 by
> September
> >> 9th.
> >>
> >>
> >> St.Ack
> >>
> >> 1.
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HBASE%20AND%20(%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.96.0%22%20or%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.95.0%22%20%20or%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.95.1%22%20or%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.95.2%22%20)%20AND%20(status%20%3D%20Resolved%20OR%20status%20%3D%20Closed)%20ORDER%20BY%20issuetype%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC
> >> 2. http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#upgrade0.96
> >>
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>

--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
and delete it from your system. Thank You.
+
Enis Söztutar 2013-09-11, 18:18
+
Nick Dimiduk 2013-09-11, 18:22
+
Stack 2013-09-11, 20:26
+
Stack 2013-09-16, 15:38
+
Nicolas Liochon 2013-09-16, 16:26
+
Stack 2013-09-16, 19:00
+
Enis Söztutar 2013-09-16, 18:40
+
Devaraj Das 2013-09-16, 20:34
+
Stack 2013-09-17, 00:10
+
Devaraj Das 2013-09-17, 00:13
+
Stack 2013-09-17, 00:22
+
Stack 2013-09-17, 06:17
+
Nick Dimiduk 2013-09-17, 18:08
+
Stack 2013-09-17, 18:10
+
Nick Dimiduk 2013-09-17, 20:28