Ted Yu 2013-03-19, 21:55
Stack 2013-03-19, 22:41
lars hofhansl 2013-03-19, 22:47
Jonathan Hsieh 2013-03-19, 23:55
-Re: HBase 0.94 build on top of hadoop 2.0
Enis Söztutar 2013-03-20, 00:16
Francis here says that they are running 94 with 23 in production here :
If not we can file a bug if there is enough interest. However, I would
imagine hadoop2 compile is more interesting.
It will not hurt to have 94 build with hadoop2 I guess.
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd prefer hbase compiling over hadoop 2.0.x. I've got one instance with
> the internally and its just been failing on TestRowCounter and
> TestImportExport frequently.
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 3:47 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Seems more useful than HBase on Hadoop 0.23.
> > I think we should either retire the HBase-on-0.23 tests or move them to
> > Hadoop 2.0. I'd vote the latter.
> > -- Lars
> > ________________________________
> > From: Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: HBase Dev List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 3:41 PM
> > Subject: Re: HBase 0.94 build on top of hadoop 2.0
> > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Should we have a standalone build for hadoop 2.0 ?
> > >
> > I would say no. File an issue though. If a patch for hbase to make it
> > work, attach it.
> > St.Ack
> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> // Software Engineer, Cloudera
> // [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ted Yu 2013-03-20, 05:14