Hi,
Currently we don't have 0.94 build on top of hadoop 2.0

I found this:
https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.94-security-on-Hadoop-23/

But it doesn't compile:

[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile
(default-compile) on project hbase: Compilation failure: Compilation
failure:
[ERROR]
/Users/tyu/94-hbase/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/zookeeper/ZKUtil.java:[41,53]
cannot find symbol
[ERROR] symbol  : class KerberosUtil
[ERROR] location: package org.apache.hadoop.security.authentication.util
[ERROR]
/Users/tyu/94-hbase/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/zookeeper/ZKUtil.java:[248,32]
cannot find symbol
[ERROR] symbol  : variable KerberosUtil
[ERROR] location: class
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.zookeeper.ZKUtil.JaasConfiguration
[ERROR] -> [Help 1]

Should we have a standalone build for hadoop 2.0 ?

Thanks

On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Should we have a standalone build for hadoop 2.0 ?
>

I would say no.  File an issue though.  If a patch for hbase to make it
work, attach it.
St.Ack

Seems more useful than HBase on Hadoop 0.23.
I think we should either retire the HBase-on-0.23 tests or move them to Hadoop 2.0. I'd vote the latter.

-- Lars

________________________________
 From: Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: HBase Dev List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 3:41 PM
Subject: Re: HBase 0.94 build on top of hadoop 2.0
 
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Should we have a standalone build for hadoop 2.0 ?
>

I would say no.  File an issue though.  If a patch for hbase to make it
work, attach it.
St.Ack

I'd prefer hbase compiling over hadoop 2.0.x.  I've got one instance with
the internally and its just been failing on TestRowCounter and
TestImportExport frequently.

Jon.

On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 3:47 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Seems more useful than HBase on Hadoop 0.23.
> I think we should either retire the HBase-on-0.23 tests or move them to
> Hadoop 2.0. I'd vote the latter.
>
> -- Lars
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>  From: Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: HBase Dev List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 3:41 PM
> Subject: Re: HBase 0.94 build on top of hadoop 2.0
>
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Should we have a standalone build for hadoop 2.0 ?
> >
>
> I would say no.  File an issue though.  If a patch for hbase to make it
> work, attach it.
> St.Ack
>

--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// Software Engineer, Cloudera
// [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Francis here says that they are running 94 with 23 in production here :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7834?focusedCommentId=13577938&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13577938

If not we can file a bug if there is enough interest. However, I would
imagine hadoop2 compile is more interesting.

It will not hurt to have 94 build with hadoop2 I guess.

Enis
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I'd prefer hbase compiling over hadoop 2.0.x.  I've got one instance with
> the internally and its just been failing on TestRowCounter and
> TestImportExport frequently.
>
> Jon.
>
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 3:47 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Seems more useful than HBase on Hadoop 0.23.
> > I think we should either retire the HBase-on-0.23 tests or move them to
> > Hadoop 2.0. I'd vote the latter.
> >
> > -- Lars
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >  From: Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: HBase Dev List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 3:41 PM
> > Subject: Re: HBase 0.94 build on top of hadoop 2.0
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Should we have a standalone build for hadoop 2.0 ?
> > >
> >
> > I would say no.  File an issue though.  If a patch for hbase to make it
> > work, attach it.
> > St.Ack
> >
>
>
>
> --
> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> // Software Engineer, Cloudera
> // [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

I got the following test failures running 0.94 against 2.0.4-SNAPSHOT:

Failed tests:
testRetrying(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.catalog.TestMetaReaderEditor): reader:
count=2, t=null
  testMROnTable(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.TestImportTsv)

testMROnTableWithTimestamp(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.TestImportTsv)

testMROnTableWithCustomMapper(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.TestImportTsv)

testBulkOutputWithoutAnExistingTable(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.TestImportTsv)

Tests in error:

testGetRegionsCatalogTables(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.catalog.TestMetaReaderEditor):
Failed after attempts=10, exceptions:(..)
  testTableExists(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.catalog.TestMetaReaderEditor):
Connection refused
  testGetRegion(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.catalog.TestMetaReaderEditor):
Connection refused
  testScanMetaForTable(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.catalog.TestMetaReaderEditor)
  testSimpleCase(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.TestImportExport)
  testMetaExport(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.TestImportExport)
  testWithDeletes(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.TestImportExport)
  testWithFilter(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.TestImportExport)

On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Enis Söztutar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Francis here says that they are running 94 with 23 in production here :
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7834?focusedCommentId=13577938&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13577938
>
> If not we can file a bug if there is enough interest. However, I would
> imagine hadoop2 compile is more interesting.
>
> It will not hurt to have 94 build with hadoop2 I guess.
>
> Enis
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'd prefer hbase compiling over hadoop 2.0.x.  I've got one instance with
> > the internally and its just been failing on TestRowCounter and
> > TestImportExport frequently.
> >
> > Jon.
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 3:47 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Seems more useful than HBase on Hadoop 0.23.
> > > I think we should either retire the HBase-on-0.23 tests or move them to
> > > Hadoop 2.0. I'd vote the latter.
> > >
> > > -- Lars
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > >  From: Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: HBase Dev List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 3:41 PM
> > > Subject: Re: HBase 0.94 build on top of hadoop 2.0
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Should we have a standalone build for hadoop 2.0 ?
> > > >
> > >
> > > I would say no.  File an issue though.  If a patch for hbase to make it
> > > work, attach it.
> > > St.Ack
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> > // Software Engineer, Cloudera
> > // [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>