-Re: AVRO Hudson Tasks
Philip Zeyliger 2010-08-25, 15:48
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 10:45 PM, Bruce Mitchener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> How would these differ from the various buildbots that we already have
> No one seemed to be interested previously in helping out with the Java or
> other builders, or we'd have them as well.
I wasn't aware that we had buildbots already (in part, because I was AWOL on
the lists for a while). I haven't seen a broken build e-mail out of them
for a while, so I assumed that they didn't exist :) For Java stuff, Hudson
is nice because it does a good job of displaying which tests failed and
succeeded (i.e., it has integration with JUnit). It's also what Hadoop
does, and what my company does in-house, so there's added familiarity for
Regardless, there's no harm in one or the other.