Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Accumulo >> mail # user >> How does Accumulo compare to HBase


Copy link to this message
-
Re: How does Accumulo compare to HBase
Performance is probably the largest difference between Accumulo and HBase.

Accumulo can ingest/scan at a rate of 800K entries/sec/node.
This performance scales well into the hundreds of nodes to deliver
100M+ entries/sec.

There are no recent HBase benchmarks and none in the peer-reviewed literature.
Old data suggests that HBase performance is ~1% of Accumulo performance.

In short, one can often replace a 20+ node database with
a single node Accumulo database.

On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 01:55:54AM +0800, Jianshi Huang wrote:

 
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB