|
|
-
Cartesian product detection in the query plan?
David Morel 2013-01-28, 09:39
Hi everyone,
I had to kill some queries that were taking forever, and it turns out they were doing cartesian products (missing ON clause on a JOIN).
I wonder how I could see that in the EXPLAIN output (which I still find a bit cryptic). Specifically, the stage that it was stuck in was this:
Stage: Stage-7 Map Reduce Alias -> Map Operator Tree: $INTNAME Reduce Output Operator sort order: tag: 1 value expressions: expr: _col1 type: int $INTNAME1 Reduce Output Operator sort order: tag: 0 value expressions: expr: _col0 type: bigint expr: _col1 type: string Reduce Operator Tree: Join Operator condition map: Inner Join 0 to 1 condition expressions: 0 {VALUE._col0} {VALUE._col1} 1 {VALUE._col1} handleSkewJoin: false outputColumnNames: _col0, _col1, _col3 File Output Operator compressed: true GlobalTableId: 0 table: input format: org.apache.hadoop.mapred.SequenceFileInputFormat output format: org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.io.HiveSequenceFileOutputFormat
Is there anything in there that should have alerted me?
I found out by looking at the query, but I wonder if the query plan (if I could read it) would have given me that information.
Thanks a lot
David Morel
+
David Morel 2013-01-28, 09:39
-
Re: Cartesian product detection in the query plan?
Edward Capriolo 2013-01-28, 13:29
Iirc hive.mapred.mode strict should prevent this. If not we should add it.
On Monday, January 28, 2013, David Morel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I had to kill some queries that were taking forever, and it turns out > they were doing cartesian products (missing ON clause on a JOIN). > > I wonder how I could see that in the EXPLAIN output (which I still find > a bit cryptic). Specifically, the stage that it was stuck in was this: > > Stage: Stage-7 > Map Reduce > Alias -> Map Operator Tree: > $INTNAME > Reduce Output Operator > sort order: > tag: 1 > value expressions: > expr: _col1 > type: int > $INTNAME1 > Reduce Output Operator > sort order: > tag: 0 > value expressions: > expr: _col0 > type: bigint > expr: _col1 > type: string > Reduce Operator Tree: > Join Operator > condition map: > Inner Join 0 to 1 > condition expressions: > 0 {VALUE._col0} {VALUE._col1} > 1 {VALUE._col1} > handleSkewJoin: false > outputColumnNames: _col0, _col1, _col3 > File Output Operator > compressed: true > GlobalTableId: 0 > table: > input format: org.apache.hadoop.mapred.SequenceFileInputFormat > output format: org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.io.HiveSequenceFileOutputFormat > > Is there anything in there that should have alerted me? > > I found out by looking at the query, but I wonder if the query plan (if > I could read it) would have given me that information. > > Thanks a lot > > David Morel >
+
Edward Capriolo 2013-01-28, 13:29
-
Re: Cartesian product detection in the query plan?
David Morel 2013-01-28, 16:45
On 28 Jan 2013, at 14:29, Edward Capriolo wrote:
> Iirc hive.mapred.mode strict should prevent this. If not we should add > it.
hi Edward,
Yes, that's indeed what the book claims (quoting):
hive> SELECT * FROM fracture_act JOIN fracture_ads > WHERE fracture_act.planner_id = fracture_ads.planner_id; FAILED: Error in semantic analysis: In strict mode, cartesian product is not allowed. If you really want to perform the operation, +set hive.mapred.mode=nonstrict+
I am about to re-enable this setting on my cluster (after fixing all the queries that it broke, especially all the ORDER BY ones :-) but I hoped it was visible right there in the query plan, or in some other way. If Hive can detect it, it should be visible somewhere, right?
Thanks!
david
> > On Monday, January 28, 2013, David Morel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> I had to kill some queries that were taking forever, and it turns out >> they were doing cartesian products (missing ON clause on a JOIN). >> >> I wonder how I could see that in the EXPLAIN output (which I still >> find >> a bit cryptic). Specifically, the stage that it was stuck in was >> this: >> >> Stage: Stage-7 >> Map Reduce >> Alias -> Map Operator Tree: >> $INTNAME >> Reduce Output Operator >> sort order: >> tag: 1 >> value expressions: >> expr: _col1 >> type: int >> $INTNAME1 >> Reduce Output Operator >> sort order: >> tag: 0 >> value expressions: >> expr: _col0 >> type: bigint >> expr: _col1 >> type: string >> Reduce Operator Tree: >> Join Operator >> condition map: >> Inner Join 0 to 1 >> condition expressions: >> 0 {VALUE._col0} {VALUE._col1} >> 1 {VALUE._col1} >> handleSkewJoin: false >> outputColumnNames: _col0, _col1, _col3 >> File Output Operator >> compressed: true >> GlobalTableId: 0 >> table: >> input format: > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.SequenceFileInputFormat >> output format: > org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.io.HiveSequenceFileOutputFormat >> >> Is there anything in there that should have alerted me? >> >> I found out by looking at the query, but I wonder if the query plan >> (if >> I could read it) would have given me that information. >> >> Thanks a lot >> >> David Morel >>
+
David Morel 2013-01-28, 16:45
-
Re: Cartesian product detection in the query plan?
Edward Capriolo 2013-01-28, 16:58
Currently order by is very inefficient in hive. Hopefully you can use sort by in most cases.
It should be "visible" in the plan. The plan should be very different if you are using the ON clause vs not. Can it be easily detected is another question. On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:45 AM, David Morel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 28 Jan 2013, at 14:29, Edward Capriolo wrote: > > Iirc hive.mapred.mode strict should prevent this. If not we should add it. >> > > hi Edward, > > Yes, that's indeed what the book claims (quoting): > > hive> SELECT * FROM fracture_act JOIN fracture_ads > > WHERE fracture_act.planner_id = fracture_ads.planner_id; > FAILED: Error in semantic analysis: In strict mode, cartesian product is > not allowed. If you really want to perform the operation, > +set hive.mapred.mode=nonstrict+ > > I am about to re-enable this setting on my cluster (after fixing all the > queries that it broke, especially all the ORDER BY ones :-) but I hoped > it was visible right there in the query plan, or in some other way. If > Hive can detect it, it should be visible somewhere, right? > > Thanks! > > david > > >> On Monday, January 28, 2013, David Morel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> I had to kill some queries that were taking forever, and it turns out >>> they were doing cartesian products (missing ON clause on a JOIN). >>> >>> I wonder how I could see that in the EXPLAIN output (which I still find >>> a bit cryptic). Specifically, the stage that it was stuck in was this: >>> >>> Stage: Stage-7 >>> Map Reduce >>> Alias -> Map Operator Tree: >>> $INTNAME >>> Reduce Output Operator >>> sort order: >>> tag: 1 >>> value expressions: >>> expr: _col1 >>> type: int >>> $INTNAME1 >>> Reduce Output Operator >>> sort order: >>> tag: 0 >>> value expressions: >>> expr: _col0 >>> type: bigint >>> expr: _col1 >>> type: string >>> Reduce Operator Tree: >>> Join Operator >>> condition map: >>> Inner Join 0 to 1 >>> condition expressions: >>> 0 {VALUE._col0} {VALUE._col1} >>> 1 {VALUE._col1} >>> handleSkewJoin: false >>> outputColumnNames: _col0, _col1, _col3 >>> File Output Operator >>> compressed: true >>> GlobalTableId: 0 >>> table: >>> input format: >>> >> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.SequenceFileInputFormat >> >>> output format: >>> >> org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.io.HiveSequenceFileOutputFormat >> >>> >>> Is there anything in there that should have alerted me? >>> >>> I found out by looking at the query, but I wonder if the query plan (if >>> I could read it) would have given me that information. >>> >>> Thanks a lot >>> >>> David Morel >>> >>>
+
Edward Capriolo 2013-01-28, 16:58
-
Re: Cartesian product detection in the query plan?
David Morel 2013-01-28, 17:16
On 28 Jan 2013, at 17:58, Edward Capriolo wrote:
> Currently order by is very inefficient in hive. Hopefully you can use > sort by in most cases.
Makes complete sense, I should have thought of it sooner. Thanks a lot!
> It should be "visible" in the plan. The plan should be very different > if you are using the ON clause vs not. Can it be easily detected is > another question.
Well, I guess that answers the question. Thanks again :-)
David
+
David Morel 2013-01-28, 17:16
-
Re: Cartesian product detection in the query plan?
Dean Wampler 2013-01-28, 17:05
By the way, v0.10.0 adds a new CROSS JOIN feature, when you really intended to do one ;)
SELECT a.x, b.y FROM tablea a CROSS JOIN tableb b;
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Edward Capriolo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Currently order by is very inefficient in hive. Hopefully you can use sort > by in most cases. > > It should be "visible" in the plan. The plan should be very different if > you are using the ON clause vs not. Can it be easily detected is another > question. > > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:45 AM, David Morel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 28 Jan 2013, at 14:29, Edward Capriolo wrote: >> >> Iirc hive.mapred.mode strict should prevent this. If not we should add >>> it. >>> >> >> hi Edward, >> >> Yes, that's indeed what the book claims (quoting): >> >> hive> SELECT * FROM fracture_act JOIN fracture_ads >> > WHERE fracture_act.planner_id = fracture_ads.planner_id; >> FAILED: Error in semantic analysis: In strict mode, cartesian product >> is not allowed. If you really want to perform the operation, >> +set hive.mapred.mode=nonstrict+ >> >> I am about to re-enable this setting on my cluster (after fixing all the >> queries that it broke, especially all the ORDER BY ones :-) but I hoped >> it was visible right there in the query plan, or in some other way. If >> Hive can detect it, it should be visible somewhere, right? >> >> Thanks! >> >> david >> >> >>> On Monday, January 28, 2013, David Morel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi everyone, >>>> >>>> I had to kill some queries that were taking forever, and it turns out >>>> they were doing cartesian products (missing ON clause on a JOIN). >>>> >>>> I wonder how I could see that in the EXPLAIN output (which I still find >>>> a bit cryptic). Specifically, the stage that it was stuck in was this: >>>> >>>> Stage: Stage-7 >>>> Map Reduce >>>> Alias -> Map Operator Tree: >>>> $INTNAME >>>> Reduce Output Operator >>>> sort order: >>>> tag: 1 >>>> value expressions: >>>> expr: _col1 >>>> type: int >>>> $INTNAME1 >>>> Reduce Output Operator >>>> sort order: >>>> tag: 0 >>>> value expressions: >>>> expr: _col0 >>>> type: bigint >>>> expr: _col1 >>>> type: string >>>> Reduce Operator Tree: >>>> Join Operator >>>> condition map: >>>> Inner Join 0 to 1 >>>> condition expressions: >>>> 0 {VALUE._col0} {VALUE._col1} >>>> 1 {VALUE._col1} >>>> handleSkewJoin: false >>>> outputColumnNames: _col0, _col1, _col3 >>>> File Output Operator >>>> compressed: true >>>> GlobalTableId: 0 >>>> table: >>>> input format: >>>> >>> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.SequenceFileInputFormat >>> >>>> output format: >>>> >>> org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.io.HiveSequenceFileOutputFormat >>> >>>> >>>> Is there anything in there that should have alerted me? >>>> >>>> I found out by looking at the query, but I wonder if the query plan (if >>>> I could read it) would have given me that information. >>>> >>>> Thanks a lot >>>> >>>> David Morel >>>> >>>> > -- *Dean Wampler, Ph.D.* thinkbiganalytics.com +1-312-339-1330
+
Dean Wampler 2013-01-28, 17:05
|
|