Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
Flume >> mail # user >> Downsides of not using any sink groups


Copy link to this message
-
Downsides of not using any sink groups
Hi,

What would be the downsides of connecting a lot of sinks to the channel
directly without any sink groups. Going by the transactional semantics, I
would think that there shouldn't be any loss of data. The downsides that I
expect would be that there wouldn't be any backoff and thus the sink that
is failing will keep trying and failing. Also load wouldn't be guaranteed
to be balanced, although since all of them get equal chance at dequeing
events it shouldn't be too bad, would it? Are there any other downsides
that I am missing?
Thanks in Advance,
Pankaj

--
*P* | (415) 677-9222 ext. 205 *F *| (415) 677-0895 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Pankaj Gupta | Software Engineer

*BrightRoll, Inc. *| Smart Video Advertising | www.brightroll.com
United States | Canada | United Kingdom | Germany
We're hiring<http://newton.newtonsoftware.com/career/CareerHome.action?clientId=8a42a12b3580e2060135837631485aa7>
!
+
Juhani Connolly 2013-08-19, 03:26
+
Roshan Naik 2013-08-20, 20:19
+
Pankaj Gupta 2013-08-23, 07:46
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB