Chris Burroughs 2012-07-26, 15:39
Neha Narkhede 2012-07-26, 15:40
Taylor Gautier 2012-07-26, 18:31
Joel Koshy 2012-07-26, 18:43
Jay Kreps 2012-07-26, 21:11
Jonathan Creasy 2012-07-26, 21:35
Joe Stein 2012-07-28, 13:50
Chris Burroughs 2012-07-28, 22:49
Derek Chen-Becker 2012-07-30, 14:04
Chris Burroughs 2012-07-31, 00:40
Jun Rao 2012-07-31, 16:08
Chris Burroughs 2012-08-02, 12:36
On 07/30/2012 08:40 PM, Chris Burroughs wrote:
> I was originally going to follow this was a [VOTE] thread, but most of
> the responses are a +1 anyway. I think we can do this and it will be a
> significant improvement. I'll follow up with INFRA this week.
> We don't have to do this, or do it now. So if anyone does have concerns
> please do speak up.
> On 07/26/2012 11:39 AM, Chris Burroughs wrote:
>> It came up in the 0.7.2 thread that with the number of parallel branches
>> git may be preferable to svn for our current and future workflow. I'd
>> like to gauge interest in possibly switching from svn to git.
>> Currently INFRA can provide read/write git hosting at
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/. Repository list:
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf To summarise there are a few
>> * Support is less polished than svn, and any problems may take longer
>> to fix.
>> * Someone from migrating projects ought to volunteer to assist INFRA if
>> needed (I volunteer).