Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
HBase >> mail # dev >> HBase wire compatibility


Copy link to this message
-
Re: HBase wire compatibility
We have a copy-paste fork of Hadoop IPC. So, it's easy enough to just
apply the same style patch to our fork of it.

On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> HADOOP-7379 was marked resolved for 0.23
>
> Does this imply that hadoop 0.23 or above must be used ?
> If so, we'd better state that on the wiki.
>
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Jimmy Xiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Sure.  I will add that.  To me, HBASE-5306 is more about the RPC engine.
>> It can evolve in parallel since the current HBase RPC
>> can support PB already due to
>> HADOOP-7379<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7379>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > It's the first bullet under Phase I.
>> >
>> > Can you mention HBASE-5306 there ?
>> >
>> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > What's the role of HBASE-5306 in your proposal ?
>> > >
>> > > Thanks
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Jimmy Xiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> I posted the proposal on wiki:
>> > >>
>> > >> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/HBaseWireCompatibility
>> > >>
>> > >> Thanks,
>> > >> Jimmy
>> > >>
>> > >> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> > Can you post on wiki ?
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Attachment stripped.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Jimmy Xiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> > > Hello,
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > As HBase installation base is getting bigger, we are ready to work
>> > on
>> > >> the
>> > >> > > wire compatibility issue.
>> > >> > > The goal is to make HBase easier for operators to upgrade, while
>> it
>> > is
>> > >> > > also easier for developers to
>> > >> > > enhance, re-architect if necessary.
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > The attached is a proposal we came up.  We'd like to start with
>> two
>> > >> > phases:
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Phase 1: Compatibility between client applications and HBase
>> > clusters
>> > >> > > Phase 2: HBase cluster rolling upgrade within same major version
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Could you please review?
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Thanks,
>> > >> > > Jimmy
>> > >> > >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>

--
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB