On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Norbert Burger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Srinivas Mupparapu
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It scans .META. table just like any other table. I just tested it and it
>> produced the expected output.
> I'm pretty sure Srinivas scanned .META. in his own environment, not mine. ;-)
>> On Sep 10, 2012 12:19 PM, "Stack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> What happens if you scan .META. in shell?
>>> hbase> scan ".META."
>>> Does it all show?
> Thanks, Stack. Strangely, all regions do show up in .META. The table
> in question has 256 regions, and all are listed as rowkeys in .META.
> Perhaps there's a column missing from region definitions which is
> preventing the UI from rendering the regions? I'll dig through the
> code, but are there specific columns known to be expected the UI?
> Fwiw, this particular table was the result of a rename_table.rb
> attempt that didn't go as smoothly as I would've liked. I had to dig
> through .META. and resolve inconsistencies.
What version of hbase? Can you disable and reenable the table? When
you scan the table in shell, do you see 'status=offline'.