Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
HBase >> mail # dev >> [DISCUSS] More new feature backports to 0.94.


+
Jonathan Hsieh 2013-03-01, 16:31
+
lars hofhansl 2013-03-01, 19:00
+
Elliott Clark 2013-03-01, 22:43
+
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-03-01, 23:12
+
Enis Söztutar 2013-03-02, 00:55
+
Jonathan Hsieh 2013-03-01, 23:11
+
lars hofhansl 2013-03-02, 02:10
+
Enis Söztutar 2013-03-02, 02:17
+
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-03-02, 02:25
+
Ted Yu 2013-03-02, 02:24
+
Andrew Purtell 2013-03-03, 13:50
+
Ted 2013-03-03, 14:12
+
Andrew Purtell 2013-03-03, 14:38
Copy link to this message
-
Re: [DISCUSS] More new feature backports to 0.94.
I agree with Andrew. I don't think a vote is required.

It seems that people who are more for option #2 also said there are
pretty ok with option #1 too, while people who are mainly for option
#1 said 0 or -1 for options #2 and #3...

So even if I prefer option #2, I think option #1 got more "votes".

JM

2013/3/3 Andrew Purtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm not sure that is necessary. I think we can establish consensus without
> doing so, but if you like, call a vote.
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Ted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Do we need to start another thread voting for options 1 and 2 ?
>>
>> We should make a decision soon so that the next 0.94 release can be made.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> On Mar 3, 2013, at 5:50 AM, Andrew Purtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > Concur. +1 on option #1 and #2, with #1 preferred, -1 on #3.
>> >
>> > On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 10:10 AM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> So it seems that until we have a stable 0.96 (maybe 0.96.1 or 0.96.2) we
>> >> have three options:
>> >> 1. Backport new features to 0.94 as we see fit as long as we do not
>> >> destabilize 0.94.
>> >> 2. Declare a certain point release (0.94.6 looks like a good candidate)
>> as
>> >> a "long term", create an 0.94.6 branch (in addition to the usual 0.94.6
>> >> tag) and than create 0.94.6.x fix only releases. I would volunteer to
>> >> maintain a 0.94.6 branch in addition to the 0.94 branch.
>> >> 3. Categorically do not backport new features into 0.94 and defer to
>> 0.95.
>> >>
>> >> I'd be +1 on option #1 and #2, and -1 on option #3.
>> >>
>> >> -- Lars
>> >
>> > --
>> > Best regards,
>> >
>> >   - Andy
>> >
>> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>> > (via Tom White)
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
+
Stack 2013-03-04, 21:27
+
Enis Söztutar 2013-03-04, 22:29
+
Andrew Purtell 2013-03-05, 01:57
+
Dave Wang 2013-03-01, 16:38
+
Lars Hofhansl 2013-03-02, 02:46
+
Enis Söztutar 2013-03-02, 02:54
+
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-03-02, 03:12
+
lars hofhansl 2013-03-02, 03:24
+
Ted Yu 2013-03-02, 03:30
+
lars hofhansl 2013-03-02, 03:44
+
Nicolas Liochon 2013-03-02, 11:43
+
Ted 2013-03-02, 11:57
+
Jonathan Hsieh 2013-03-02, 15:36
+
lars hofhansl 2013-03-02, 16:47
+
Ted Yu 2013-03-02, 16:14
+
Jonathan Hsieh 2013-03-02, 16:26
+
lars hofhansl 2013-03-02, 20:46
+
Jonathan Hsieh 2013-03-02, 21:49
+
Stack 2013-03-02, 23:24
+
lars hofhansl 2013-03-02, 03:23
+
Lars Hofhansl 2013-03-02, 02:45