Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Pig, mail # dev - pig 0.11 candidate 2 feedback: Several problems


Copy link to this message
-
Re: pig 0.11 candidate 2 feedback: Several problems
Prashant Kommireddi 2013-03-16, 00:12
Looks like all outstanding 0.11.1 critical bugs are fixed. Time for an
RC? Please let me know if I can help.

On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Dmitriy Ryaboy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Looks like Lohit found a critical bug we should fix for 11.1:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3241(only observed in hadoop
> 2.0)
>
> D
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Prashant Kommireddi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >wrote:
>
> > Dmitriy, are the gc fixes all in for 0.11.1? PIG-3148 and PIG-3212 are
> the
> > 2 JIRAs I know were fixed, any others?
> >
> > I have a patch up for 3194, I think we should be good for a release once
> > that makes it in.
> >
> > -Prashant
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Prashant Kommireddi <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Great.
> > >
> > > I have commented regarding a possible approach for PIG-3194
> > > http://goo.gl/UQ3zs. Please take a look when you folks have a chance.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Dmitriy Ryaboy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> I'd like to get the gc fix in as well, but looks like Rohini is about
> to
> > >> commit it so we are good there.
> > >>
> > >> On Mar 1, 2013, at 11:33 AM, Bill Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > +1 to releasing Pig 0.11.1 when this is addressed. I should be able
> to
> > >> help
> > >> > with the release again.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Prashant Kommireddi <
> > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> Hey Guys,
> > >> >>
> > >> >> I wanted to start a conversation on this again. If Kai is not
> looking
> > >> at
> > >> >> PIG-3194 I can start working on it to get 0.11 compatible with
> 20.2.
> > If
> > >> >> everyone agrees, we should roll out 0.11.1 sooner than usual and I
> > >> >> volunteer to help with it in anyway possible.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Any objections to getting 0.11.1 out soon after 3194 is fixed?
> > >> >>
> > >> >> -Prashant
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Russell Jurney <
> > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> >>> wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >>> I stand corrected. Cool, 0.11 is good!
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <
> > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> >>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>> Just a unrelated note: The CDH3 is more closer to Hadoop 1.x than
> > to
> > >> >>> 0.20.
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> Jarcec
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:04:51PM -0800, Dmitriy Ryaboy wrote:
> > >> >>>>> I agree -- this is a good release. The bugs Kai pointed out
> should
> > >> be
> > >> >>>>> fixed, but as they are not critical regressions, we can fix them
> > in
> > >> >>>> 0.11.1
> > >> >>>>> (if someone wants to roll 0.11.1 the minute these fixes are
> > >> >> committed,
> > >> >>> I
> > >> >>>>> won't mind and will dutifully vote for the release).
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> I think the Hadoop 20.2 incompatibility is unfortunate but iirc
> > this
> > >> >> is
> > >> >>>>> fixable by setting HADOOP_USER_CLASSPATH_FIRST=true (was that in
> > >> >> 20.2?)
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> FWIW Twitter's running CDH3 and this release works in our
> > >> >> environment.
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> At this point things that block a release are critical
> regressions
> > >> in
> > >> >>>>> performance or correctness.
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> D
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Alan Gates <
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> >
> > >> >>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> No.  Bugs like these are supposed to be found and fixed after
> we
> > >> >>> branch
> > >> >>>>>> from trunk (which happened several months ago in the case of
> > 0.11).
> > >> >>>> The
> > >> >>>>>> point of RCs are to check that it's a good build, licenses are
> > >> >> right,
> > >> >>>> etc.
> > >> >>>>>> Any bugs found this late in the game have to be seen as
> failures
> > >> >> of
> > >> >>>>>> earlier testing.
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> Alan.
> > >> >>>>>>