-RE: Does hadoop installations need to be at same locations in cluster ?
Here's the thing...
1) When building the cluster, you want to be consistent.
2) Location of $HADOOP_HOME is configurable. So you can place it anywhere.
Putting the software in two different locations isn't a good idea because you now have to set it up with a unique configuration per node.
It would be faster and make your life a lot easier by putting the software in the same location on *all* machines.
So my suggestion would be to bite the bullet and rebuild your cluster.
> Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 19:47:45 +0530
> Subject: Re: Does hadoop installations need to be at same locations in cluster ?
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> What I mean to say is, Does hadoop internally assumes that all
> installations on each nodes need to be in same location.
> I was having hadoop installed on different location on 2 different nodes.
> I configured hadoop config files to be a part of same cluster.
> But when I started hadoop on master, I saw it was also searching for
> hadoop starting scripts in the same location as of master.
> Do we have any workaround in these kind of situation or do I have to
> reinstall hadoop again on same location as master.
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Michael Segel
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sure,
> > You could do that, but in doing so, you will make your life a living hell.
> > Literally.
> > Think about it... You will have to manually manage each nodes config files...
> > So if something goes wrong you will have a hard time diagnosing the issue.
> > Why make life harder?
> > Why not just do the simple think and make all of your DN the same?
> > Sent from my iPhone
> > On Dec 23, 2011, at 6:51 AM, "praveenesh kumar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> When installing hadoop on slave machines, do we have to install hadoop
> >> at same locations on each machine ?
> >> Can we have hadoop installation at different location on different
> >> machines at same cluster ?
> >> If yes, what things we have to take care in that case
> >> Thanks,
> >> Praveenesh