java8964 2013-12-20, 14:28
-Re: Running Hadoop v2 clustered mode MR on an NFS mounted filesystem
Yong raises an important issue: You have thrown out the I/O advantages
of HDFS and also thrown out the advantages of data locality. It would be
interesting to know why you are taking this approach.
On 12/20/2013 9:28 AM, java8964 wrote:
> I believe the "-fs local" should be removed too. The reason is that
> even you have a dedicated JobTracker after removing "-jt local", but
> with "-fs local", I believe that all the mappers will be run
> "-fs local" will force the mapreducer run in "local" mode, which is
> really a test mode.
> What you can do is to remove both "-fs local -jt local", but give the
> FULL URI of the input and output path, to tell Hadoop that they are
> local filesystem instead of HDFS.
> "hadoop jar
> wordcount file:///hduser/mount_point file:///results"
> Keep in mind followings:
> 1) The NFS mount need to be available in all your Task Nodes, and
> mounted in the same way.
> 2) Even you can do that, but your sharing storage will be your
> bottleneck. NFS won't work well for scalability.
> Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 09:01:32 -0500
> Subject: Re: Running Hadoop v2 clustered mode MR on an NFS mounted
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I think most of your problem is coming from the options you are setting:
> "hadoop jar
> wordcount *-fs local -jt local* /hduser/mount_point/ /results"
> You appear to be directing your namenode to run jobs in the
> *LOCAL* job runner and directing it to read from the
> *LOCAL* filesystem. Drop the *-jt* argument and it should run in
> distributed mode if your cluster is set up right. You don't need to do
> anything special to point Hadoop towards a NFS location, other than
> set up the NFS location properly and make sure if you are directing to
> it by name that it will resolve to the right address. Hadoop doesn't
> care where it is, as long as it can read from and write to it. The
> fact that you are telling it to read/write from/to a NFS location that
> happens to be mounted as a local filesystem object doesn't matter -
> you could direct it to the local /hduser/ path and set the -fs local
> option, and it would end up on the NFS mount, because that's where the
> NFS mount actually exists, or you could direct it to the absolute
> network location of the folder that you want, it shouldn't make a
> *Devin Suiter*
> Jr. Data Solutions Software Engineer
> 100 Sandusky Street | 2nd Floor | Pittsburgh, PA 15212
> Google Voice: 412-256-8556 | www.rdx.com <http://www.rdx.com/>
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 5:27 AM, Atish Kathpal
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> The picture below describes the deployment architecture I am
> trying to achieve.
> However, when I run the wordcount example code with the below
> configuration, by issuing the command from the master node, I
> notice only the master node spawning map tasks and completing the
> submitted job. Below is the command I used:
> *hadoop jar
> wordcount -fs local -jt local /hduser/mount_point/ /results*
> _Question: How can I leverage both the hadoop nodes for running
> MR, while serving my data from the common NFS mount point running
> my filesystem at the backend? Has any one tried such a setup before?_
> Inline image 1
Atish Kathpal 2014-01-08, 10:00
Atish Kathpal 2014-01-08, 10:18
java8964 2014-01-10, 15:42
Atish Kathpal 2014-01-12, 10:36
Atish Kathpal 2014-01-12, 10:44