Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
Hive >> mail # dev >> Hive 0.9 release

Ashutosh Chauhan 2012-04-03, 01:33
Carl Steinbach 2012-04-03, 01:39
Ashutosh Chauhan 2012-04-03, 01:59
Thomas Weise 2012-04-03, 02:02
Ashutosh Chauhan 2012-04-06, 19:18
Hugo Trippaers 2012-04-06, 19:34
Owen OMalley 2012-04-06, 22:00
Ashutosh Chauhan 2012-04-10, 00:01
Copy link to this message
Re: Hive 0.9 release
All-clear. Trunk is now open for commits.

Since HIVE-2929 have resulted in intermittent test failures. (See,
HIVE-2937), I branched right before HIVE-2929.  Additionally, I merged in
HIVE-2764 in 0.9

I also added version 0.10 on jira, so any commits on trunk now must have
0.10 as "fix version".


On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 17:01, Ashutosh Chauhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> As per the plan I am going to create a branch now. Please hold off any
> commits till I send an email for "all-clear".
> Thanks,
> Ashutosh
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 15:00, Owen O'Malley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I think we also need to get the RAT report cleaned up. Apache projects
>> aren't supposed to release while they have files without the Apache
>> header. I've filed HIVE-2930 to fix all of the issues.
>> While working on it, I found that one of the files was added by
>> HIVE-2246. HIVE-2246 was contributed by Sohan Jain, who hasn't filed
>> an ICLA, and doesn't have the jira box checked for contribution. Does
>> someone know him and can ask him to state on the jira that he intended
>> to contribute it? Failing that, I believe he was working at Facebook
>> at the time, so someone else who is still there can upload the patch
>> to the jira?
>> All of this brings up a challenge in that Phabricator and the Apache
>> review tool upload patches to jira without providing a way to check
>> the "contribute to Apache" box. Without the checkbox we should only
>> commit patches from people who have filed ICLAs. Is there a way to add
>> an option the arc command that will check the box? Even having it
>> *always* check the box is better than having it not check the box.
>> (Although it should warn users that it is doing so.)
>> Thoughts?
>> -- Owen