Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
Hadoop >> mail # general >> [VOTE] sed bylaws.html -e 's/lazy\s+consensus/consensus approval/gi'


+
Robert Evans 2013-03-25, 18:28
+
Hitesh Shah 2013-03-25, 19:01
+
sandy.ryza@... 2013-03-25, 19:23
+
amareshwari sriramdasu 2013-03-26, 04:34
+
Noah Slater 2013-03-25, 18:36
+
Karthik Kambatla 2013-03-25, 18:43
+
Harsh J 2013-03-26, 15:23
+
Jonathan Eagles 2013-03-26, 15:14
+
Steve Loughran 2013-03-26, 08:35
+
Noah Slater 2013-03-26, 09:07
+
Robert Evans 2013-03-26, 14:01
+
Chris Douglas 2013-03-26, 15:49
+
Suresh Srinivas 2013-03-26, 22:55
+
Matt Foley 2013-03-26, 23:26
+
Thomas Graves 2013-03-26, 18:19
+
Giridharan Kesavan 2013-03-27, 04:16
+
Yves S. Garret 2013-03-27, 04:21
+
Harsh J 2013-03-27, 05:26
+
Uma Maheswara Rao G 2013-03-27, 04:21
+
Jason Lowe 2013-03-28, 16:07
+
Robert Evans 2013-04-02, 16:05
+
Noah Slater 2013-04-02, 16:08
Copy link to this message
-
Re: [VOTE] sed bylaws.html -e 's/lazy\s+consensus/consensus approval/gi'
I think it is a great idea. And if he wants to call a vote I would be
happy to support it.

--Bobby

On 4/2/13 11:08 AM, "Noah Slater" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Cool, thanks Bobby. Is someone going to do a separate vote for Doug's
>suggestion?
>
>
>On 2 April 2013 17:05, Robert Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I don't think I messed this up but if I for the binding/non-binding
>>count
>> wrong then please forgive me.
>> With 9-binding +1s 8-non-binding +1s and no vetoes the vote passes.
>>
>> I will update the bylaws accordingly.
>>
>> --Bobby
>>
>>
>> On 3/28/13 11:07 AM, "Jason Lowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >+1 (binding)
>> >
>> >Jason
>> >
>> >On 03/25/2013 01:28 PM, Robert Evans wrote:
>> >> As per Aaron's request I am starting a new voting thread to make it
>> >>obvious that there is a vote happening.
>> >>
>> >> I propose that we change the term "lazy consensus" to "consensus
>> >>approval" (aka s/lazy\s+consensus/consensus approval/gi) in the bylaws
>> >>so that it matches the terms used in the apache foundation glossary.
>>No
>> >>actual change to our voting would take place, just the term we use to
>> >>describe that voting.
>> >>
>> >> As per the by-laws this would take a "lazy majority" of active PMC
>> >>members (although others are encouraged to speak up).
>> >>
>> >> Lazy Majority - A lazy majority vote requires 3 binding +1 votes and
>> >>more binding +1 votes than -1 votes.
>> >>
>> >> Voting lasts 7 days, so it closes Monday April 1st (But this is not a
>> >>joke).
>> >>
>> >> I am +1 (binding)
>> >>
>> >> --Bobby
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
>--
>NS
+
Doug Cutting 2013-03-27, 17:12
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB