Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Hadoop, mail # general - [VOTE] sed bylaws.html -e 's/lazy\s+consensus/consensus approval/gi'


Copy link to this message
-
Re: [VOTE] sed bylaws.html -e 's/lazy\s+consensus/consensus approval/gi'
Robert Evans 2013-04-02, 16:21
I think it is a great idea. And if he wants to call a vote I would be
happy to support it.

--Bobby

On 4/2/13 11:08 AM, "Noah Slater" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Cool, thanks Bobby. Is someone going to do a separate vote for Doug's
>suggestion?
>
>
>On 2 April 2013 17:05, Robert Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I don't think I messed this up but if I for the binding/non-binding
>>count
>> wrong then please forgive me.
>> With 9-binding +1s 8-non-binding +1s and no vetoes the vote passes.
>>
>> I will update the bylaws accordingly.
>>
>> --Bobby
>>
>>
>> On 3/28/13 11:07 AM, "Jason Lowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >+1 (binding)
>> >
>> >Jason
>> >
>> >On 03/25/2013 01:28 PM, Robert Evans wrote:
>> >> As per Aaron's request I am starting a new voting thread to make it
>> >>obvious that there is a vote happening.
>> >>
>> >> I propose that we change the term "lazy consensus" to "consensus
>> >>approval" (aka s/lazy\s+consensus/consensus approval/gi) in the bylaws
>> >>so that it matches the terms used in the apache foundation glossary.
>>No
>> >>actual change to our voting would take place, just the term we use to
>> >>describe that voting.
>> >>
>> >> As per the by-laws this would take a "lazy majority" of active PMC
>> >>members (although others are encouraged to speak up).
>> >>
>> >> Lazy Majority - A lazy majority vote requires 3 binding +1 votes and
>> >>more binding +1 votes than -1 votes.
>> >>
>> >> Voting lasts 7 days, so it closes Monday April 1st (But this is not a
>> >>joke).
>> >>
>> >> I am +1 (binding)
>> >>
>> >> --Bobby
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
>--
>NS