The same principal should guide 0.94.x, right ?
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks for your comment, Todd.
> > I have observed some flexibility in this regard from, say cdh3u4a:
> Irrelevant. Off-topic. Probably info. that doesn't belong on a
> public list (Also of a kind that matches specious argument made at
> tail of HBASE-6726 where a feature in production on different branches
> somehow makes it so its stable in a different branch).
> +1 on Todd's original sentiment (He beat me too it); bug-fixes only in
> old branches especially the higher the point version.