Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Hadoop >> mail # dev >> Bugfix release 2.0.4.1


Copy link to this message
-
Re: Bugfix release 2.0.4.1
Thanks guys! I will start the release vote shortly.

Cos

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 06:23PM, Anatoli Fomenko wrote:
> From Bigtop perspective, Hadoop══2.0.4.1 is unblocked with regards to a
> Sqoop 2 blocker, and the voting can be started.
>
> Anatoli
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Konstantin Boudnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, May 20, 2013 at 9:03 PM
> Subject: Re: Bugfix release 2.0.4.1
> To:═[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> The build is over, all unit tests have passed.
> Roman, the 2.0.4.1 tarballs are available from
> https://builds.apache.org/job/ Hadoop-branch-2.0.4/47/
>
> For Bigtop to use as the base.
> ═ Cos
>
> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 12:15PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> > I have ran the full set of unit tests on the patched version and I see 3
> > failures in HDFS HA stress tests, which are clearly not related to fix in
> > question. I will commit it shortly.
> >
> > Cos
> >
> > On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 12:03AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > It's a little dirty, but Mark and Jarek (presumably from BigTop) ran a patched version with my change at MAPREDUCE-5240.
> > >
> > > I've just updated the patch to apply cleanly on branch-2.0.4 (had to refactor
> > > quite a bit of unit tests). Hopefully Cos can apply it═tomorrow═and we
> > > can start testing Bigtop.
> > >
> > > > Otherwise we may end up creating lots of bug-fix releases.
> > >
> > > Agreed. The point of 2.0.4.1 is to unblock Bigtop 0.6.0 release. We're
> > > trying to come with stable base line for Hadoop 2.0.x where
> > > all the downstream components will be running smoothly.
> > >
> > > At this point a MAPREDUCE-5240 is the only thing holding us
> > > up, but once we start our own round of testing other issues
> > > could pop up. We shall see how it goes.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Roman.══