Thanks for the URL, watching.
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Jesse Yates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's reasonable to me. Also, given that HBASE-6055 is 'Snapshots in 0.96'
> (at the moment), seems fine to make the association.
> Jesse Yates
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hey all,
>> We've started (or will very soon start) committing patches to a github repo
>> for the snapshot branch (https://github.com/jyates/hbase/tree/snapshots,
>> likely other forks coming). I've added a component for snapshots to the
>> jira. I'm considering adding a version (likely the 'hbase-6055'
>> version/branch) so that when snapshot sub-issues get committed to the
>> branch, we resolve with that fix version and not have to worry about
>> muddling the main '0.96' release version until it is merged in. If for
>> some reason if this doesn't make 0.96, we wouldn't have to do a jira
>> cleanup pass. If it does, we just add the 0.96 fix version to all those
>> Does this seem ok? Does the name I'm suggesting seem good? (I considered
>> 'snapshots' but this is confusing IMO because of SNAPSHOT versions and I
>> didn't want to tie it to a particular version).
>> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
>> // Software Engineer, Cloudera
>> // [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
Hein (via Tom White)