Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
Hadoop >> mail # general >> [VOTE] Release hadoop-0.23.2-rc0


+
Arun C Murthy 2012-03-29, 22:45
+
Ted Yu 2012-03-29, 22:55
+
Arun C Murthy 2012-03-29, 23:07
+
Eli Collins 2012-04-18, 18:54
+
Arun C Murthy 2012-04-19, 18:26
+
Arun C Murthy 2012-04-19, 18:45
+
Eli Collins 2012-04-19, 19:26
+
Todd Lipcon 2012-04-19, 19:54
+
Enis Söztutar 2012-04-19, 20:05
Copy link to this message
-
Re: [VOTE] Release hadoop-0.23.2-rc0
I believe it's premature to release a non-alpha. branch-2.0 does not contain a full working implementation of host-based tokens that was introduced in 1.x (yes, it was done out of order...).  This is a very important feature that prevents tokens from being invalidated when a host's ip changes.  The token implementation in 2.0 requires daemons to be restarted and/or jobs resubmitted when the ip of an NN is changed (ex. an upgrade).  Host-based tokens prevents the need to restart all cluster that access a remote cluster that is upgraded.

I've been actively working on the yarn side and close to completion.  Until that's complete, I feel we should consider 2.x an alpha so there's not an omission of a major feature.

Daryn
On Apr 19, 2012, at 1:45 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:

> Yep, makes sense - I'll roll an rc0 for 2.0 after.
>
> However, we should consider whether HDFS protocols are 'ready' for us to commit to them for the foreseeable future, my sense is that it's a tad early - particularly with auto-failover not complete.
>
> Thus, we have a couple of options:
> a) Call the first release here as *2.0.0-alpha* version (lots of ASF projects do this).
> b) Just go with 2.0.0 and deem 2.0.x or 2.1.x as the first stable release and fwd-compatible release later.
>
> Given this is a major release (unlike something obscure like hadoop-0.23.0) I'm inclined to go with a) i.e. hadoop-2.0.0-alpha.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Arun
>
> On Apr 19, 2012, at 12:24 AM, Eli Collins wrote:
>
>> Hey Arun,
>>
>> This vote passed a week or so ago, let's make it official?
>>
>> Also, are you still planning to roll a hadoop-2.0.0-rc0 of branch-2
>> this week?  I think we should do that soon, if you're not planning to
>> do this holler and I'd be happy to.  There's only 1 blocker left
>> (http://bit.ly/I55LAd) and it's patch available, I think we should
>> role an rc from branch-2 when it's merged.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Eli
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> 0.23.2 is just  a small set of bug-fixes on top of 0.23.1 and doesn't have NN HA etc.
>>>
>>> As I've noted separately, I plan to put out a hadoop-2.0.0-rc0 in a couple weeks with NN HA, PB for HDFS etc.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>> Arun
>>>
>>> On Mar 29, 2012, at 3:55 PM, Ted Yu wrote:
>>>
>>>> What are the issues fixed / features added in 0.23.2 compared to 0.23.1 ?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I've created a release candidate for hadoop-0.23.2 that I would like to
>>>>> release.
>>>>>
>>>>> It is available at: http://people.apache.org/~acmurthy/hadoop-0.23.2-rc0/
>>>>>
>>>>> The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 7 days.
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks,
>>>>> Arun
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Arun C. Murthy
>>>>> Hortonworks Inc.
>>>>> http://hortonworks.com/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Arun C. Murthy
>>> Hortonworks Inc.
>>> http://hortonworks.com/
>>>
>>>
>
> --
> Arun C. Murthy
> Hortonworks Inc.
> http://hortonworks.com/
>
>
+
Todd Lipcon 2012-04-20, 18:41
+
Eric Baldeschwieler 2012-04-23, 21:54
+
Steve Loughran 2012-04-24, 10:47
+
Thomas Jungblut 2012-04-24, 11:04
+
Robert Evans 2012-03-30, 14:50
+
Siddharth Seth 2012-04-04, 22:56
+
Thomas Graves 2012-04-03, 13:07