Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
HBase >> mail # dev >> Re: Working on assemblies for 0.95


+
Stack 2013-03-22, 04:17
Copy link to this message
-
Re: Working on assemblies for 0.95
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 4:49 AM, Jimmy Xiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> At first, I prefer separated binary jar and source jar, because we don't
> need to the source jar in most cases.
>
> As to hadoop, how about we ship two: one with hadoop1, the other with
> hadoop2?
>

  I agree to this.  Actually this will help a lot in case of automatic
scripts that tries to use the tarball.  If not every time the source has to
be recompiled with hadoop 2 and then need to create a tar ball and use it.
 +1 on this.

>
> Thanks,
> Jimmy
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Nick Dimiduk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > There you go again, ignoring my email :p
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I've started in on assemblies for 0.95.  I have a few questions looking
> > at
> > > what we currently have.
> > >
> > > Here is what it looks like when you untar it:
> > >
> > > -rw-r--r--   1 stack  staff  261312 Mar 18 09:27 CHANGES.txt
> > > -rw-r--r--   1 stack  staff   11358 Mar 18 09:27 LICENSE.txt
> > > -rw-r--r--   1 stack  staff     897 Mar 18 09:27 NOTICE.txt
> > > -rw-r--r--   1 stack  staff    1377 Mar 18 09:27 README.txt
> > > drwxr-xr-x  27 stack  staff     918 Mar 18 09:27 bin
> > > drwxr-xr-x   9 stack  staff     306 Mar 20 22:37 conf
> > > drwxr-xr-x  12 stack  staff     408 Mar 19 15:23 dev-support
> > > drwxr-xr-x  67 stack  staff    2278 Mar 21 12:12 docs
> > > drwxr-xr-x   4 stack  staff     136 Mar 21 12:12 hbase-client
> > > drwxr-xr-x   4 stack  staff     136 Mar 21 12:12 hbase-common
> > > drwxr-xr-x   6 stack  staff     204 Mar 21 12:13 hbase-examples
> > > drwxr-xr-x   4 stack  staff     136 Mar 21 12:13 hbase-hadoop-compat
> > > drwxr-xr-x   4 stack  staff     136 Mar 21 12:13 hbase-hadoop1-compat
> > > drwxr-xr-x   4 stack  staff     136 Mar 21 12:13 hbase-it
> > > drwxr-xr-x   4 stack  staff     136 Mar 21 12:12 hbase-prefix-tree
> > > drwxr-xr-x   4 stack  staff     136 Mar 21 12:12 hbase-protocol
> > > drwxr-xr-x   4 stack  staff     136 Mar 21 12:13 hbase-server
> > > drwxr-xr-x   7 stack  staff     238 Mar 21 12:13 hbase-webapps
> > > drwxr-xr-x  68 stack  staff    2312 Mar 21 14:24 lib
> > > drwxr-xr-x   5 stack  staff     170 Mar 21 14:25 logs
> > > -rw-r--r--   1 stack  staff   66716 Mar 21 09:55 pom.xml
> > > drwxr-xr-x   6 stack  staff     204 Mar 18 09:27 src
> > >
> > >
> > > The src dir and the hbase-* module dirs have src in them.  We should
> > > probably have the src all in one place.  I'm thinking that we should
> > have a
> > > hbase-0.95*-bin.tar.gz and a hbase-0.95-src.tar.gz.  And release them
> > > together.  When you untar the src over the bin you will get something
> you
> > > can build if you wanted to (so pom.xml would be over in src).  Any
> > > preferences?
> > >
> > > I need to go through the lib dir and purge the transtiive includes we
> > don't
> > > need.  Its a pain figuring what we do and do not need.  Useful making
> the
> > > evaluation are the fancy hbase-it tools that have been coming in; I can
> > run
> > > suite of tests w/ the runtime and see what breaks.  For hbase-it tests
> to
> > > work, it looks like junit needs to be included as a runtime dependency.
> >  We
> > > ok w/ that?
> > >
> > > What shall we ship?  A single hbase that defaults to hadoop1?  Or we
> > build
> > > a hadoop2 too and ship a binary that includes hadoop2 also?
> > >
> > > Your Release Manager,
> > > St.Ack
> > >
> >
>
+
Andrew Purtell 2013-03-22, 22:59
+
Stack 2013-03-23, 03:52
+
Andrew Purtell 2013-03-25, 20:53
+
Enis Söztutar 2013-03-25, 21:00
+
Nick Dimiduk 2013-03-25, 21:06
+
Stack 2013-03-26, 05:26
+
Enis Söztutar 2013-03-23, 02:02
+
Stack 2013-03-23, 03:37