Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
Accumulo >> mail # dev >> Can Iterators be made user-specific or shell-session-specific?


+
David Medinets 2013-05-09, 13:47
+
John Vines 2013-05-09, 13:49
+
David Medinets 2013-05-09, 14:39
Copy link to this message
-
Re: Can Iterators be made user-specific or shell-session-specific?
There is a setscaniter shell command that I had missed. Thanks, David L!
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:39 AM, David Medinets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> Yes. But it seems like anything accessing that table also uses that
> iterator.
>
>
> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 9:49 AM, John Vines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> You can declare iterators to use at scan time.
>>
>> Sent from my phone, please pardon the typos and brevity.
>> On May 9, 2013 9:48 AM, "David Medinets" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I'm asking in case I missed something in the documentation. This issue
>> > hasn't arisen before since I haven't shared tables before. When I
>> attach an
>> > iterator to a table in the shell, it affects everyone (and every
>> process)
>> > that accesses that table. Is there a standard of practice? Do people
>> clone
>> > tables before developing new iterators or before exploring data with
>> > existing iterators?
>> >
>>
>
>
+
Keith Turner 2013-05-09, 14:45
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB