Alexey
2012-10-09, 10:12
Alexey
2012-10-10, 05:23
Harsh J
2012-10-10, 06:50
Alexey
2012-10-10, 06:54
Harsh J
2012-10-10, 06:56
Alexey
2012-10-10, 07:20
Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
2012-10-16, 00:22
Andy Isaacson
2012-10-16, 01:56
Ted Dunning
2012-10-16, 02:23
Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
2012-10-16, 02:36
-
DFS respond very slowAlexey 2012-10-09, 10:12
Hi,
I have an issues with hadoop dfs, I have 3 servers (24Gb RAM on each).
The servers are not overloaded, they just have hadoop installed. One
have datanode and namenode, second - datanode only, third - datanode and
secondarynamenode.
Hadoop datanodes have a max memory limit 8Gb. Default replication factor
- 2. Limited replication bandwidth between datanodes - 5Mb.
I've setupped hadoop to communicate between nodes by IP address.
Everything is works - I can read/write files on each datanode, etc. But
the issue is that hadoop dfs commands are executing very slow, even
"hadoop dfs -ls /" takes about 3 seconds to execute, but it have only
one folder /user in it.
Files are also uploading to the hdfs very slow - hundreds kilobytes/second.
I'm using Debian stable x86-64 distribution and hadoop running through
sun-java6-jdk 6.26-0squeeze1
Please give me any suggestions what I need to adjust/check to arrange
this issue.
As I said before - overall hdfs configuration is correct, because
everything works except performance.
--
Best regards
Alexey
I have an issues with hadoop dfs, I have 3 servers (24Gb RAM on each).
The servers are not overloaded, they just have hadoop installed. One
have datanode and namenode, second - datanode only, third - datanode and
secondarynamenode.
Hadoop datanodes have a max memory limit 8Gb. Default replication factor
- 2. Limited replication bandwidth between datanodes - 5Mb.
I've setupped hadoop to communicate between nodes by IP address.
Everything is works - I can read/write files on each datanode, etc. But
the issue is that hadoop dfs commands are executing very slow, even
"hadoop dfs -ls /" takes about 3 seconds to execute, but it have only
one folder /user in it.
Files are also uploading to the hdfs very slow - hundreds kilobytes/second.
I'm using Debian stable x86-64 distribution and hadoop running through
sun-java6-jdk 6.26-0squeeze1
Please give me any suggestions what I need to adjust/check to arrange
this issue.
As I said before - overall hdfs configuration is correct, because
everything works except performance.
--
Best regards
Alexey
-
Re: DFS respond very slowAlexey 2012-10-10, 05:23
Additional info: I also tried to use openjdk instead of sun's - issue
still persists
On 10/09/12 03:12 AM, Alexey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have an issues with hadoop dfs, I have 3 servers (24Gb RAM on each).
> The servers are not overloaded, they just have hadoop installed. One
> have datanode and namenode, second - datanode only, third - datanode and
> secondarynamenode.
>
> Hadoop datanodes have a max memory limit 8Gb. Default replication factor
> - 2. Limited replication bandwidth between datanodes - 5Mb.
>
> I've setupped hadoop to communicate between nodes by IP address.
> Everything is works - I can read/write files on each datanode, etc. But
> the issue is that hadoop dfs commands are executing very slow, even
> "hadoop dfs -ls /" takes about 3 seconds to execute, but it have only
> one folder /user in it.
> Files are also uploading to the hdfs very slow - hundreds kilobytes/second.
>
> I'm using Debian stable x86-64 distribution and hadoop running through
> sun-java6-jdk 6.26-0squeeze1
>
> Please give me any suggestions what I need to adjust/check to arrange
> this issue.
>
> As I said before - overall hdfs configuration is correct, because
> everything works except performance.
>
> --
> Best regards
> Alexey
>
--
Best regards
Alexey
still persists
On 10/09/12 03:12 AM, Alexey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have an issues with hadoop dfs, I have 3 servers (24Gb RAM on each).
> The servers are not overloaded, they just have hadoop installed. One
> have datanode and namenode, second - datanode only, third - datanode and
> secondarynamenode.
>
> Hadoop datanodes have a max memory limit 8Gb. Default replication factor
> - 2. Limited replication bandwidth between datanodes - 5Mb.
>
> I've setupped hadoop to communicate between nodes by IP address.
> Everything is works - I can read/write files on each datanode, etc. But
> the issue is that hadoop dfs commands are executing very slow, even
> "hadoop dfs -ls /" takes about 3 seconds to execute, but it have only
> one folder /user in it.
> Files are also uploading to the hdfs very slow - hundreds kilobytes/second.
>
> I'm using Debian stable x86-64 distribution and hadoop running through
> sun-java6-jdk 6.26-0squeeze1
>
> Please give me any suggestions what I need to adjust/check to arrange
> this issue.
>
> As I said before - overall hdfs configuration is correct, because
> everything works except performance.
>
> --
> Best regards
> Alexey
>
--
Best regards
Alexey
-
Re: DFS respond very slowHarsh J 2012-10-10, 06:50
Hey Alexey,
Have you noticed this right from the start itself? Also, what exactly
do you mean by "Limited replication bandwidth between datanodes -
5Mb." - Are you talking of dfs.balance.bandwidthPerSec property?
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Alexey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Additional info: I also tried to use openjdk instead of sun's - issue
> still persists
>
> On 10/09/12 03:12 AM, Alexey wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have an issues with hadoop dfs, I have 3 servers (24Gb RAM on each).
>> The servers are not overloaded, they just have hadoop installed. One
>> have datanode and namenode, second - datanode only, third - datanode and
>> secondarynamenode.
>>
>> Hadoop datanodes have a max memory limit 8Gb. Default replication factor
>> - 2. Limited replication bandwidth between datanodes - 5Mb.
>>
>> I've setupped hadoop to communicate between nodes by IP address.
>> Everything is works - I can read/write files on each datanode, etc. But
>> the issue is that hadoop dfs commands are executing very slow, even
>> "hadoop dfs -ls /" takes about 3 seconds to execute, but it have only
>> one folder /user in it.
>> Files are also uploading to the hdfs very slow - hundreds kilobytes/second.
>>
>> I'm using Debian stable x86-64 distribution and hadoop running through
>> sun-java6-jdk 6.26-0squeeze1
>>
>> Please give me any suggestions what I need to adjust/check to arrange
>> this issue.
>>
>> As I said before - overall hdfs configuration is correct, because
>> everything works except performance.
>>
>> --
>> Best regards
>> Alexey
>>
>
> --
> Best regards
> Alexey
--
Harsh J
Have you noticed this right from the start itself? Also, what exactly
do you mean by "Limited replication bandwidth between datanodes -
5Mb." - Are you talking of dfs.balance.bandwidthPerSec property?
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Alexey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Additional info: I also tried to use openjdk instead of sun's - issue
> still persists
>
> On 10/09/12 03:12 AM, Alexey wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have an issues with hadoop dfs, I have 3 servers (24Gb RAM on each).
>> The servers are not overloaded, they just have hadoop installed. One
>> have datanode and namenode, second - datanode only, third - datanode and
>> secondarynamenode.
>>
>> Hadoop datanodes have a max memory limit 8Gb. Default replication factor
>> - 2. Limited replication bandwidth between datanodes - 5Mb.
>>
>> I've setupped hadoop to communicate between nodes by IP address.
>> Everything is works - I can read/write files on each datanode, etc. But
>> the issue is that hadoop dfs commands are executing very slow, even
>> "hadoop dfs -ls /" takes about 3 seconds to execute, but it have only
>> one folder /user in it.
>> Files are also uploading to the hdfs very slow - hundreds kilobytes/second.
>>
>> I'm using Debian stable x86-64 distribution and hadoop running through
>> sun-java6-jdk 6.26-0squeeze1
>>
>> Please give me any suggestions what I need to adjust/check to arrange
>> this issue.
>>
>> As I said before - overall hdfs configuration is correct, because
>> everything works except performance.
>>
>> --
>> Best regards
>> Alexey
>>
>
> --
> Best regards
> Alexey
--
Harsh J
-
Re: DFS respond very slowAlexey 2012-10-10, 06:54
Hello Harsh,
I notices such issues from the start.
Yes, I mean dfs.balance.bandwidthPerSec property, I set this property to
5000000.
On 10/09/12 11:50 PM, Harsh J wrote:
> Hey Alexey,
>
> Have you noticed this right from the start itself? Also, what exactly
> do you mean by "Limited replication bandwidth between datanodes -
> 5Mb." - Are you talking of dfs.balance.bandwidthPerSec property?
>
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Alexey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Additional info: I also tried to use openjdk instead of sun's - issue
>> still persists
>>
>> On 10/09/12 03:12 AM, Alexey wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have an issues with hadoop dfs, I have 3 servers (24Gb RAM on each).
>>> The servers are not overloaded, they just have hadoop installed. One
>>> have datanode and namenode, second - datanode only, third - datanode and
>>> secondarynamenode.
>>>
>>> Hadoop datanodes have a max memory limit 8Gb. Default replication factor
>>> - 2. Limited replication bandwidth between datanodes - 5Mb.
>>>
>>> I've setupped hadoop to communicate between nodes by IP address.
>>> Everything is works - I can read/write files on each datanode, etc. But
>>> the issue is that hadoop dfs commands are executing very slow, even
>>> "hadoop dfs -ls /" takes about 3 seconds to execute, but it have only
>>> one folder /user in it.
>>> Files are also uploading to the hdfs very slow - hundreds kilobytes/second.
>>>
>>> I'm using Debian stable x86-64 distribution and hadoop running through
>>> sun-java6-jdk 6.26-0squeeze1
>>>
>>> Please give me any suggestions what I need to adjust/check to arrange
>>> this issue.
>>>
>>> As I said before - overall hdfs configuration is correct, because
>>> everything works except performance.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best regards
>>> Alexey
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards
>> Alexey
>
>
>
--
Best regards
Alexey
I notices such issues from the start.
Yes, I mean dfs.balance.bandwidthPerSec property, I set this property to
5000000.
On 10/09/12 11:50 PM, Harsh J wrote:
> Hey Alexey,
>
> Have you noticed this right from the start itself? Also, what exactly
> do you mean by "Limited replication bandwidth between datanodes -
> 5Mb." - Are you talking of dfs.balance.bandwidthPerSec property?
>
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Alexey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Additional info: I also tried to use openjdk instead of sun's - issue
>> still persists
>>
>> On 10/09/12 03:12 AM, Alexey wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have an issues with hadoop dfs, I have 3 servers (24Gb RAM on each).
>>> The servers are not overloaded, they just have hadoop installed. One
>>> have datanode and namenode, second - datanode only, third - datanode and
>>> secondarynamenode.
>>>
>>> Hadoop datanodes have a max memory limit 8Gb. Default replication factor
>>> - 2. Limited replication bandwidth between datanodes - 5Mb.
>>>
>>> I've setupped hadoop to communicate between nodes by IP address.
>>> Everything is works - I can read/write files on each datanode, etc. But
>>> the issue is that hadoop dfs commands are executing very slow, even
>>> "hadoop dfs -ls /" takes about 3 seconds to execute, but it have only
>>> one folder /user in it.
>>> Files are also uploading to the hdfs very slow - hundreds kilobytes/second.
>>>
>>> I'm using Debian stable x86-64 distribution and hadoop running through
>>> sun-java6-jdk 6.26-0squeeze1
>>>
>>> Please give me any suggestions what I need to adjust/check to arrange
>>> this issue.
>>>
>>> As I said before - overall hdfs configuration is correct, because
>>> everything works except performance.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best regards
>>> Alexey
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards
>> Alexey
>
>
>
--
Best regards
Alexey
-
Re: DFS respond very slowHarsh J 2012-10-10, 06:56
Hi,
OK, can you detail your network infrastructure used here, and also
make sure your daemons are binding to the right interfaces as well
(use netstat to check perhaps)? What rate of transfer do you get for
simple file transfers (ftp, scp, etc.)?
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Alexey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Harsh,
>
> I notices such issues from the start.
> Yes, I mean dfs.balance.bandwidthPerSec property, I set this property to
> 5000000.
>
> On 10/09/12 11:50 PM, Harsh J wrote:
>> Hey Alexey,
>>
>> Have you noticed this right from the start itself? Also, what exactly
>> do you mean by "Limited replication bandwidth between datanodes -
>> 5Mb." - Are you talking of dfs.balance.bandwidthPerSec property?
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Alexey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Additional info: I also tried to use openjdk instead of sun's - issue
>>> still persists
>>>
>>> On 10/09/12 03:12 AM, Alexey wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I have an issues with hadoop dfs, I have 3 servers (24Gb RAM on each).
>>>> The servers are not overloaded, they just have hadoop installed. One
>>>> have datanode and namenode, second - datanode only, third - datanode and
>>>> secondarynamenode.
>>>>
>>>> Hadoop datanodes have a max memory limit 8Gb. Default replication factor
>>>> - 2. Limited replication bandwidth between datanodes - 5Mb.
>>>>
>>>> I've setupped hadoop to communicate between nodes by IP address.
>>>> Everything is works - I can read/write files on each datanode, etc. But
>>>> the issue is that hadoop dfs commands are executing very slow, even
>>>> "hadoop dfs -ls /" takes about 3 seconds to execute, but it have only
>>>> one folder /user in it.
>>>> Files are also uploading to the hdfs very slow - hundreds kilobytes/second.
>>>>
>>>> I'm using Debian stable x86-64 distribution and hadoop running through
>>>> sun-java6-jdk 6.26-0squeeze1
>>>>
>>>> Please give me any suggestions what I need to adjust/check to arrange
>>>> this issue.
>>>>
>>>> As I said before - overall hdfs configuration is correct, because
>>>> everything works except performance.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best regards
>>>> Alexey
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best regards
>>> Alexey
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Best regards
> Alexey
--
Harsh J
OK, can you detail your network infrastructure used here, and also
make sure your daemons are binding to the right interfaces as well
(use netstat to check perhaps)? What rate of transfer do you get for
simple file transfers (ftp, scp, etc.)?
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Alexey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Harsh,
>
> I notices such issues from the start.
> Yes, I mean dfs.balance.bandwidthPerSec property, I set this property to
> 5000000.
>
> On 10/09/12 11:50 PM, Harsh J wrote:
>> Hey Alexey,
>>
>> Have you noticed this right from the start itself? Also, what exactly
>> do you mean by "Limited replication bandwidth between datanodes -
>> 5Mb." - Are you talking of dfs.balance.bandwidthPerSec property?
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Alexey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Additional info: I also tried to use openjdk instead of sun's - issue
>>> still persists
>>>
>>> On 10/09/12 03:12 AM, Alexey wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I have an issues with hadoop dfs, I have 3 servers (24Gb RAM on each).
>>>> The servers are not overloaded, they just have hadoop installed. One
>>>> have datanode and namenode, second - datanode only, third - datanode and
>>>> secondarynamenode.
>>>>
>>>> Hadoop datanodes have a max memory limit 8Gb. Default replication factor
>>>> - 2. Limited replication bandwidth between datanodes - 5Mb.
>>>>
>>>> I've setupped hadoop to communicate between nodes by IP address.
>>>> Everything is works - I can read/write files on each datanode, etc. But
>>>> the issue is that hadoop dfs commands are executing very slow, even
>>>> "hadoop dfs -ls /" takes about 3 seconds to execute, but it have only
>>>> one folder /user in it.
>>>> Files are also uploading to the hdfs very slow - hundreds kilobytes/second.
>>>>
>>>> I'm using Debian stable x86-64 distribution and hadoop running through
>>>> sun-java6-jdk 6.26-0squeeze1
>>>>
>>>> Please give me any suggestions what I need to adjust/check to arrange
>>>> this issue.
>>>>
>>>> As I said before - overall hdfs configuration is correct, because
>>>> everything works except performance.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best regards
>>>> Alexey
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best regards
>>> Alexey
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Best regards
> Alexey
--
Harsh J
-
Re: DFS respond very slowAlexey 2012-10-10, 07:20
ok, here you go:
I have 3 servers:
datanode on server 1, 2, 3
namenode on server 1
secondarynamenode on server 2
all servers are at the hetzner datacenter and connected through 100Mbit
link, pings between them about 0.1ms
each server has 24Gb ram and intel core i7 3Ghz CPU
disk is 700Gb RAID
the bindings related configuration is the following:
server 1:
core-site.xml
--------------------------------------
<name>fs.default.name</name>
<value>hdfs://5.6.7.11:8020</value>
--------------------------------------
hdfs-site.xml
--------------------------------------
<name>dfs.datanode.address</name>
<value>0.0.0.0:50010</value>
<name>dfs.datanode.http.address</name>
<value>0.0.0.0:50075</value>
<name>dfs.http.address</name>
<value>5.6.7.11:50070</value>
<name>dfs.secondary.https.port</name>
<value>50490</value>
<name>dfs.https.port</name>
<value>50470</value>
<name>dfs.https.address</name>
<value>5.6.7.11:50470</value>
<name>dfs.secondary.http.address</name>
<value>5.6.7.12:50090</value>
--------------------------------------
server 2:
core-site.xml
--------------------------------------
<name>fs.default.name</name>
<value>hdfs://5.6.7.11:8020</value>
--------------------------------------
hdfs-site.xml
--------------------------------------
<name>dfs.datanode.address</name>
<value>0.0.0.0:50010</value>
<name>dfs.datanode.http.address</name>
<value>0.0.0.0:50075</value>
<name>dfs.http.address</name>
<value>5.6.7.11:50070</value>
<name>dfs.secondary.https.port</name>
<value>50490</value>
<name>dfs.https.port</name>
<value>50470</value>
<name>dfs.https.address</name>
<value>5.6.7.11:50470</value>
<name>dfs.secondary.http.address</name>
<value>5.6.7.12:50090</value>
--------------------------------------
server 3:
core-site.xml
--------------------------------------
<name>fs.default.name</name>
<value>hdfs://5.6.7.11:8020</value>
--------------------------------------
hdfs-site.xml
--------------------------------------
<name>dfs.datanode.address</name>
<value>0.0.0.0:50010</value>
<name>dfs.datanode.http.address</name>
<value>0.0.0.0:50075</value>
<name>dfs.http.address</name>
<value>127.0.0.1:50070</value>
<name>dfs.secondary.https.port</name>
<value>50490</value>
<name>dfs.https.port</name>
<value>50470</value>
<name>dfs.https.address</name>
<value>127.0.0.1:50470</value>
<name>dfs.secondary.http.address</name>
<value>5.6.7.12:50090</value>
--------------------------------------
netstat output:
server 1
> tcp 0 0 5.6.7.11:8020 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 10870/java
> tcp 0 0 5.6.7.11:50070 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 10870/java
> tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:50010 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 10997/java
> tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:50075 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 10997/java
> tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:50020 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 10997/java
server 2
> tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:50010 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 23683/java
> tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:50075 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 23683/java
> tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:50020 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 23683/java
> tcp 0 0 5.6.7.12:50090 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 23778/java
server 3
> tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:50010 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 894/java
> tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:50075 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 894/java
> tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:50020 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 894/java
if I'm transferring big files between servers I'm getting about 9Mb/s
and even 10Mb/s with rsync
On 10/09/12 11:56 PM, Harsh J wrote:
> Hi,
>
> OK, can you detail your network infrastructure used here, and also
> make sure your daemons are binding to the right interfaces as well
> (use netstat to check perhaps)? What rate of transfer do you get for
> simple file transfers (ftp, scp, etc.)?
>
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Alexey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Best regards
Alexey
I have 3 servers:
datanode on server 1, 2, 3
namenode on server 1
secondarynamenode on server 2
all servers are at the hetzner datacenter and connected through 100Mbit
link, pings between them about 0.1ms
each server has 24Gb ram and intel core i7 3Ghz CPU
disk is 700Gb RAID
the bindings related configuration is the following:
server 1:
core-site.xml
--------------------------------------
<name>fs.default.name</name>
<value>hdfs://5.6.7.11:8020</value>
--------------------------------------
hdfs-site.xml
--------------------------------------
<name>dfs.datanode.address</name>
<value>0.0.0.0:50010</value>
<name>dfs.datanode.http.address</name>
<value>0.0.0.0:50075</value>
<name>dfs.http.address</name>
<value>5.6.7.11:50070</value>
<name>dfs.secondary.https.port</name>
<value>50490</value>
<name>dfs.https.port</name>
<value>50470</value>
<name>dfs.https.address</name>
<value>5.6.7.11:50470</value>
<name>dfs.secondary.http.address</name>
<value>5.6.7.12:50090</value>
--------------------------------------
server 2:
core-site.xml
--------------------------------------
<name>fs.default.name</name>
<value>hdfs://5.6.7.11:8020</value>
--------------------------------------
hdfs-site.xml
--------------------------------------
<name>dfs.datanode.address</name>
<value>0.0.0.0:50010</value>
<name>dfs.datanode.http.address</name>
<value>0.0.0.0:50075</value>
<name>dfs.http.address</name>
<value>5.6.7.11:50070</value>
<name>dfs.secondary.https.port</name>
<value>50490</value>
<name>dfs.https.port</name>
<value>50470</value>
<name>dfs.https.address</name>
<value>5.6.7.11:50470</value>
<name>dfs.secondary.http.address</name>
<value>5.6.7.12:50090</value>
--------------------------------------
server 3:
core-site.xml
--------------------------------------
<name>fs.default.name</name>
<value>hdfs://5.6.7.11:8020</value>
--------------------------------------
hdfs-site.xml
--------------------------------------
<name>dfs.datanode.address</name>
<value>0.0.0.0:50010</value>
<name>dfs.datanode.http.address</name>
<value>0.0.0.0:50075</value>
<name>dfs.http.address</name>
<value>127.0.0.1:50070</value>
<name>dfs.secondary.https.port</name>
<value>50490</value>
<name>dfs.https.port</name>
<value>50470</value>
<name>dfs.https.address</name>
<value>127.0.0.1:50470</value>
<name>dfs.secondary.http.address</name>
<value>5.6.7.12:50090</value>
--------------------------------------
netstat output:
server 1
> tcp 0 0 5.6.7.11:8020 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 10870/java
> tcp 0 0 5.6.7.11:50070 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 10870/java
> tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:50010 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 10997/java
> tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:50075 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 10997/java
> tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:50020 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 10997/java
server 2
> tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:50010 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 23683/java
> tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:50075 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 23683/java
> tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:50020 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 23683/java
> tcp 0 0 5.6.7.12:50090 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 23778/java
server 3
> tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:50010 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 894/java
> tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:50075 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 894/java
> tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:50020 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 894/java
if I'm transferring big files between servers I'm getting about 9Mb/s
and even 10Mb/s with rsync
On 10/09/12 11:56 PM, Harsh J wrote:
> Hi,
>
> OK, can you detail your network infrastructure used here, and also
> make sure your daemons are binding to the right interfaces as well
> (use netstat to check perhaps)? What rate of transfer do you get for
> simple file transfers (ftp, scp, etc.)?
>
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Alexey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Best regards
Alexey
-
Re: DFS respond very slowVinod Kumar Vavilapalli 2012-10-16, 00:22
Try picking up a single operation say "hadoop dfs -ls" and start profiling.
- Time the client JVM is taking to start. Enable debug logging on the client side by exporting HADOOP_ROOT_LOGGER=DEBUG,CONSOLE
- Time between the client starting and the namenode audit logs showing the read request. Also enable debug logging on the daemons too.
- Also, you can wget the namenode web pages and see how fast they return.
To repeat what is already obvious, It is most likely related to your network setup and/or configuration.
Thanks,
+Vinod
On Oct 10, 2012, at 12:20 AM, Alexey wrote:
> ok, here you go:
> I have 3 servers:
> datanode on server 1, 2, 3
> namenode on server 1
> secondarynamenode on server 2
>
> all servers are at the hetzner datacenter and connected through 100Mbit
> link, pings between them about 0.1ms
>
> each server has 24Gb ram and intel core i7 3Ghz CPU
> disk is 700Gb RAID
>
> the bindings related configuration is the following:
> server 1:
> core-site.xml
> --------------------------------------
> <name>fs.default.name</name>
> <value>hdfs://5.6.7.11:8020</value>
> --------------------------------------
>
> hdfs-site.xml
> --------------------------------------
> <name>dfs.datanode.address</name>
> <value>0.0.0.0:50010</value>
>
> <name>dfs.datanode.http.address</name>
> <value>0.0.0.0:50075</value>
>
> <name>dfs.http.address</name>
> <value>5.6.7.11:50070</value>
>
> <name>dfs.secondary.https.port</name>
> <value>50490</value>
>
> <name>dfs.https.port</name>
> <value>50470</value>
>
> <name>dfs.https.address</name>
> <value>5.6.7.11:50470</value>
>
> <name>dfs.secondary.http.address</name>
> <value>5.6.7.12:50090</value>
> --------------------------------------
>
> server 2:
> core-site.xml
> --------------------------------------
> <name>fs.default.name</name>
> <value>hdfs://5.6.7.11:8020</value>
> --------------------------------------
>
> hdfs-site.xml
> --------------------------------------
> <name>dfs.datanode.address</name>
> <value>0.0.0.0:50010</value>
>
> <name>dfs.datanode.http.address</name>
> <value>0.0.0.0:50075</value>
>
> <name>dfs.http.address</name>
> <value>5.6.7.11:50070</value>
>
> <name>dfs.secondary.https.port</name>
> <value>50490</value>
>
> <name>dfs.https.port</name>
> <value>50470</value>
>
> <name>dfs.https.address</name>
> <value>5.6.7.11:50470</value>
>
> <name>dfs.secondary.http.address</name>
> <value>5.6.7.12:50090</value>
> --------------------------------------
>
> server 3:
> core-site.xml
> --------------------------------------
> <name>fs.default.name</name>
> <value>hdfs://5.6.7.11:8020</value>
> --------------------------------------
>
> hdfs-site.xml
> --------------------------------------
> <name>dfs.datanode.address</name>
> <value>0.0.0.0:50010</value>
>
> <name>dfs.datanode.http.address</name>
> <value>0.0.0.0:50075</value>
>
> <name>dfs.http.address</name>
> <value>127.0.0.1:50070</value>
>
> <name>dfs.secondary.https.port</name>
> <value>50490</value>
>
> <name>dfs.https.port</name>
> <value>50470</value>
>
> <name>dfs.https.address</name>
> <value>127.0.0.1:50470</value>
>
> <name>dfs.secondary.http.address</name>
> <value>5.6.7.12:50090</value>
> --------------------------------------
>
> netstat output:
> server 1
>> tcp 0 0 5.6.7.11:8020 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 10870/java
>> tcp 0 0 5.6.7.11:50070 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 10870/java
>> tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:50010 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 10997/java
>> tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:50075 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 10997/java
>> tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:50020 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 10997/java
>
> server 2
>> tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:50010 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 23683/java
>> tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:50075 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 23683/java
>> tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:50020 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 23683/java
- Time the client JVM is taking to start. Enable debug logging on the client side by exporting HADOOP_ROOT_LOGGER=DEBUG,CONSOLE
- Time between the client starting and the namenode audit logs showing the read request. Also enable debug logging on the daemons too.
- Also, you can wget the namenode web pages and see how fast they return.
To repeat what is already obvious, It is most likely related to your network setup and/or configuration.
Thanks,
+Vinod
On Oct 10, 2012, at 12:20 AM, Alexey wrote:
> ok, here you go:
> I have 3 servers:
> datanode on server 1, 2, 3
> namenode on server 1
> secondarynamenode on server 2
>
> all servers are at the hetzner datacenter and connected through 100Mbit
> link, pings between them about 0.1ms
>
> each server has 24Gb ram and intel core i7 3Ghz CPU
> disk is 700Gb RAID
>
> the bindings related configuration is the following:
> server 1:
> core-site.xml
> --------------------------------------
> <name>fs.default.name</name>
> <value>hdfs://5.6.7.11:8020</value>
> --------------------------------------
>
> hdfs-site.xml
> --------------------------------------
> <name>dfs.datanode.address</name>
> <value>0.0.0.0:50010</value>
>
> <name>dfs.datanode.http.address</name>
> <value>0.0.0.0:50075</value>
>
> <name>dfs.http.address</name>
> <value>5.6.7.11:50070</value>
>
> <name>dfs.secondary.https.port</name>
> <value>50490</value>
>
> <name>dfs.https.port</name>
> <value>50470</value>
>
> <name>dfs.https.address</name>
> <value>5.6.7.11:50470</value>
>
> <name>dfs.secondary.http.address</name>
> <value>5.6.7.12:50090</value>
> --------------------------------------
>
> server 2:
> core-site.xml
> --------------------------------------
> <name>fs.default.name</name>
> <value>hdfs://5.6.7.11:8020</value>
> --------------------------------------
>
> hdfs-site.xml
> --------------------------------------
> <name>dfs.datanode.address</name>
> <value>0.0.0.0:50010</value>
>
> <name>dfs.datanode.http.address</name>
> <value>0.0.0.0:50075</value>
>
> <name>dfs.http.address</name>
> <value>5.6.7.11:50070</value>
>
> <name>dfs.secondary.https.port</name>
> <value>50490</value>
>
> <name>dfs.https.port</name>
> <value>50470</value>
>
> <name>dfs.https.address</name>
> <value>5.6.7.11:50470</value>
>
> <name>dfs.secondary.http.address</name>
> <value>5.6.7.12:50090</value>
> --------------------------------------
>
> server 3:
> core-site.xml
> --------------------------------------
> <name>fs.default.name</name>
> <value>hdfs://5.6.7.11:8020</value>
> --------------------------------------
>
> hdfs-site.xml
> --------------------------------------
> <name>dfs.datanode.address</name>
> <value>0.0.0.0:50010</value>
>
> <name>dfs.datanode.http.address</name>
> <value>0.0.0.0:50075</value>
>
> <name>dfs.http.address</name>
> <value>127.0.0.1:50070</value>
>
> <name>dfs.secondary.https.port</name>
> <value>50490</value>
>
> <name>dfs.https.port</name>
> <value>50470</value>
>
> <name>dfs.https.address</name>
> <value>127.0.0.1:50470</value>
>
> <name>dfs.secondary.http.address</name>
> <value>5.6.7.12:50090</value>
> --------------------------------------
>
> netstat output:
> server 1
>> tcp 0 0 5.6.7.11:8020 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 10870/java
>> tcp 0 0 5.6.7.11:50070 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 10870/java
>> tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:50010 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 10997/java
>> tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:50075 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 10997/java
>> tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:50020 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 10997/java
>
> server 2
>> tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:50010 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 23683/java
>> tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:50075 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 23683/java
>> tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:50020 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 23683/java
-
Re: DFS respond very slowAndy Isaacson 2012-10-16, 01:56
Also, note that JVM startup overhead, etc, means your -ls time is not
completely unreasonable. Using OpenJDK on a cluster of VMs, my "hdfs
dfs -ls" takes 1.88 seconds according to time (and 1.59 seconds of
user CPU time).
I'd be much more concerned about your slow transfer times. On the
same cluster, I can easily push 4 MB/sec even with only a 100MB file
using "hdfs dfs -put - foo.txt". And of course using distcp or
multiple -put workloads HDFS can saturate multiple GigE links.
-andy
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Try picking up a single operation say "hadoop dfs -ls" and start profiling.
> - Time the client JVM is taking to start. Enable debug logging on the
> client side by exporting HADOOP_ROOT_LOGGER=DEBUG,CONSOLE
> - Time between the client starting and the namenode audit logs showing the
> read request. Also enable debug logging on the daemons too.
> - Also, you can wget the namenode web pages and see how fast they return.
>
> To repeat what is already obvious, It is most likely related to your network
> setup and/or configuration.
>
> Thanks,
> +Vinod
>
> On Oct 10, 2012, at 12:20 AM, Alexey wrote:
>
> ok, here you go:
> I have 3 servers:
> datanode on server 1, 2, 3
> namenode on server 1
> secondarynamenode on server 2
>
> all servers are at the hetzner datacenter and connected through 100Mbit
> link, pings between them about 0.1ms
>
> each server has 24Gb ram and intel core i7 3Ghz CPU
> disk is 700Gb RAID
>
> the bindings related configuration is the following:
> server 1:
> core-site.xml
> --------------------------------------
> <name>fs.default.name</name>
> <value>hdfs://5.6.7.11:8020</value>
> --------------------------------------
>
> hdfs-site.xml
> --------------------------------------
> <name>dfs.datanode.address</name>
> <value>0.0.0.0:50010</value>
>
> <name>dfs.datanode.http.address</name>
> <value>0.0.0.0:50075</value>
>
> <name>dfs.http.address</name>
> <value>5.6.7.11:50070</value>
>
> <name>dfs.secondary.https.port</name>
> <value>50490</value>
>
> <name>dfs.https.port</name>
> <value>50470</value>
>
> <name>dfs.https.address</name>
> <value>5.6.7.11:50470</value>
>
> <name>dfs.secondary.http.address</name>
> <value>5.6.7.12:50090</value>
> --------------------------------------
>
> server 2:
> core-site.xml
> --------------------------------------
> <name>fs.default.name</name>
> <value>hdfs://5.6.7.11:8020</value>
> --------------------------------------
>
> hdfs-site.xml
> --------------------------------------
> <name>dfs.datanode.address</name>
> <value>0.0.0.0:50010</value>
>
> <name>dfs.datanode.http.address</name>
> <value>0.0.0.0:50075</value>
>
> <name>dfs.http.address</name>
> <value>5.6.7.11:50070</value>
>
> <name>dfs.secondary.https.port</name>
> <value>50490</value>
>
> <name>dfs.https.port</name>
> <value>50470</value>
>
> <name>dfs.https.address</name>
> <value>5.6.7.11:50470</value>
>
> <name>dfs.secondary.http.address</name>
> <value>5.6.7.12:50090</value>
> --------------------------------------
>
> server 3:
> core-site.xml
> --------------------------------------
> <name>fs.default.name</name>
> <value>hdfs://5.6.7.11:8020</value>
> --------------------------------------
>
> hdfs-site.xml
> --------------------------------------
> <name>dfs.datanode.address</name>
> <value>0.0.0.0:50010</value>
>
> <name>dfs.datanode.http.address</name>
> <value>0.0.0.0:50075</value>
>
> <name>dfs.http.address</name>
> <value>127.0.0.1:50070</value>
>
> <name>dfs.secondary.https.port</name>
> <value>50490</value>
>
> <name>dfs.https.port</name>
> <value>50470</value>
>
> <name>dfs.https.address</name>
> <value>127.0.0.1:50470</value>
>
> <name>dfs.secondary.http.address</name>
> <value>5.6.7.12:50090</value>
> --------------------------------------
>
> netstat output:
> server 1
>
> tcp 0 0 5.6.7.11:8020 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> 10870/java
>
> tcp 0 0 5.6.7.11:50070 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
completely unreasonable. Using OpenJDK on a cluster of VMs, my "hdfs
dfs -ls" takes 1.88 seconds according to time (and 1.59 seconds of
user CPU time).
I'd be much more concerned about your slow transfer times. On the
same cluster, I can easily push 4 MB/sec even with only a 100MB file
using "hdfs dfs -put - foo.txt". And of course using distcp or
multiple -put workloads HDFS can saturate multiple GigE links.
-andy
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Try picking up a single operation say "hadoop dfs -ls" and start profiling.
> - Time the client JVM is taking to start. Enable debug logging on the
> client side by exporting HADOOP_ROOT_LOGGER=DEBUG,CONSOLE
> - Time between the client starting and the namenode audit logs showing the
> read request. Also enable debug logging on the daemons too.
> - Also, you can wget the namenode web pages and see how fast they return.
>
> To repeat what is already obvious, It is most likely related to your network
> setup and/or configuration.
>
> Thanks,
> +Vinod
>
> On Oct 10, 2012, at 12:20 AM, Alexey wrote:
>
> ok, here you go:
> I have 3 servers:
> datanode on server 1, 2, 3
> namenode on server 1
> secondarynamenode on server 2
>
> all servers are at the hetzner datacenter and connected through 100Mbit
> link, pings between them about 0.1ms
>
> each server has 24Gb ram and intel core i7 3Ghz CPU
> disk is 700Gb RAID
>
> the bindings related configuration is the following:
> server 1:
> core-site.xml
> --------------------------------------
> <name>fs.default.name</name>
> <value>hdfs://5.6.7.11:8020</value>
> --------------------------------------
>
> hdfs-site.xml
> --------------------------------------
> <name>dfs.datanode.address</name>
> <value>0.0.0.0:50010</value>
>
> <name>dfs.datanode.http.address</name>
> <value>0.0.0.0:50075</value>
>
> <name>dfs.http.address</name>
> <value>5.6.7.11:50070</value>
>
> <name>dfs.secondary.https.port</name>
> <value>50490</value>
>
> <name>dfs.https.port</name>
> <value>50470</value>
>
> <name>dfs.https.address</name>
> <value>5.6.7.11:50470</value>
>
> <name>dfs.secondary.http.address</name>
> <value>5.6.7.12:50090</value>
> --------------------------------------
>
> server 2:
> core-site.xml
> --------------------------------------
> <name>fs.default.name</name>
> <value>hdfs://5.6.7.11:8020</value>
> --------------------------------------
>
> hdfs-site.xml
> --------------------------------------
> <name>dfs.datanode.address</name>
> <value>0.0.0.0:50010</value>
>
> <name>dfs.datanode.http.address</name>
> <value>0.0.0.0:50075</value>
>
> <name>dfs.http.address</name>
> <value>5.6.7.11:50070</value>
>
> <name>dfs.secondary.https.port</name>
> <value>50490</value>
>
> <name>dfs.https.port</name>
> <value>50470</value>
>
> <name>dfs.https.address</name>
> <value>5.6.7.11:50470</value>
>
> <name>dfs.secondary.http.address</name>
> <value>5.6.7.12:50090</value>
> --------------------------------------
>
> server 3:
> core-site.xml
> --------------------------------------
> <name>fs.default.name</name>
> <value>hdfs://5.6.7.11:8020</value>
> --------------------------------------
>
> hdfs-site.xml
> --------------------------------------
> <name>dfs.datanode.address</name>
> <value>0.0.0.0:50010</value>
>
> <name>dfs.datanode.http.address</name>
> <value>0.0.0.0:50075</value>
>
> <name>dfs.http.address</name>
> <value>127.0.0.1:50070</value>
>
> <name>dfs.secondary.https.port</name>
> <value>50490</value>
>
> <name>dfs.https.port</name>
> <value>50470</value>
>
> <name>dfs.https.address</name>
> <value>127.0.0.1:50470</value>
>
> <name>dfs.secondary.http.address</name>
> <value>5.6.7.12:50090</value>
> --------------------------------------
>
> netstat output:
> server 1
>
> tcp 0 0 5.6.7.11:8020 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> 10870/java
>
> tcp 0 0 5.6.7.11:50070 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
-
Re: DFS respond very slowTed Dunning 2012-10-16, 02:23
Uhhh... Alexey, did you really mean that you are running 100 mega bit per
second network links?
That is going to make hadoop run *really* slowly.
Also, putting RAID under any DFS, be it Hadoop or MapR is not a good recipe
for performance. Not that it matters if you only have 10mega bytes per
second available from the network.
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Andy Isaacson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, note that JVM startup overhead, etc, means your -ls time is not
> completely unreasonable. Using OpenJDK on a cluster of VMs, my "hdfs
> dfs -ls" takes 1.88 seconds according to time (and 1.59 seconds of
> user CPU time).
>
> I'd be much more concerned about your slow transfer times. On the
> same cluster, I can easily push 4 MB/sec even with only a 100MB file
> using "hdfs dfs -put - foo.txt". And of course using distcp or
> multiple -put workloads HDFS can saturate multiple GigE links.
>
> -andy
>
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Try picking up a single operation say "hadoop dfs -ls" and start
> profiling.
> > - Time the client JVM is taking to start. Enable debug logging on the
> > client side by exporting HADOOP_ROOT_LOGGER=DEBUG,CONSOLE
> > - Time between the client starting and the namenode audit logs showing
> the
> > read request. Also enable debug logging on the daemons too.
> > - Also, you can wget the namenode web pages and see how fast they
> return.
> >
> > To repeat what is already obvious, It is most likely related to your
> network
> > setup and/or configuration.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > +Vinod
> >
> > On Oct 10, 2012, at 12:20 AM, Alexey wrote:
> >
> > ok, here you go:
> > I have 3 servers:
> > datanode on server 1, 2, 3
> > namenode on server 1
> > secondarynamenode on server 2
> >
> > all servers are at the hetzner datacenter and connected through 100Mbit
> > link, pings between them about 0.1ms
> >
> > each server has 24Gb ram and intel core i7 3Ghz CPU
> > disk is 700Gb RAID
> >
> > the bindings related configuration is the following:
> > server 1:
> > core-site.xml
> > --------------------------------------
> > <name>fs.default.name</name>
> > <value>hdfs://5.6.7.11:8020</value>
> > --------------------------------------
> >
> > hdfs-site.xml
> > --------------------------------------
> > <name>dfs.datanode.address</name>
> > <value>0.0.0.0:50010</value>
> >
> > <name>dfs.datanode.http.address</name>
> > <value>0.0.0.0:50075</value>
> >
> > <name>dfs.http.address</name>
> > <value>5.6.7.11:50070</value>
> >
> > <name>dfs.secondary.https.port</name>
> > <value>50490</value>
> >
> > <name>dfs.https.port</name>
> > <value>50470</value>
> >
> > <name>dfs.https.address</name>
> > <value>5.6.7.11:50470</value>
> >
> > <name>dfs.secondary.http.address</name>
> > <value>5.6.7.12:50090</value>
> > --------------------------------------
> >
> > server 2:
> > core-site.xml
> > --------------------------------------
> > <name>fs.default.name</name>
> > <value>hdfs://5.6.7.11:8020</value>
> > --------------------------------------
> >
> > hdfs-site.xml
> > --------------------------------------
> > <name>dfs.datanode.address</name>
> > <value>0.0.0.0:50010</value>
> >
> > <name>dfs.datanode.http.address</name>
> > <value>0.0.0.0:50075</value>
> >
> > <name>dfs.http.address</name>
> > <value>5.6.7.11:50070</value>
> >
> > <name>dfs.secondary.https.port</name>
> > <value>50490</value>
> >
> > <name>dfs.https.port</name>
> > <value>50470</value>
> >
> > <name>dfs.https.address</name>
> > <value>5.6.7.11:50470</value>
> >
> > <name>dfs.secondary.http.address</name>
> > <value>5.6.7.12:50090</value>
> > --------------------------------------
> >
> > server 3:
> > core-site.xml
> > --------------------------------------
> > <name>fs.default.name</name>
> > <value>hdfs://5.6.7.11:8020</value>
> > --------------------------------------
> >
> > hdfs-site.xml
> > --------------------------------------
> > <name>dfs.datanode.address</name>
> > <value>0.0.0.0:50010</value>
second network links?
That is going to make hadoop run *really* slowly.
Also, putting RAID under any DFS, be it Hadoop or MapR is not a good recipe
for performance. Not that it matters if you only have 10mega bytes per
second available from the network.
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Andy Isaacson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, note that JVM startup overhead, etc, means your -ls time is not
> completely unreasonable. Using OpenJDK on a cluster of VMs, my "hdfs
> dfs -ls" takes 1.88 seconds according to time (and 1.59 seconds of
> user CPU time).
>
> I'd be much more concerned about your slow transfer times. On the
> same cluster, I can easily push 4 MB/sec even with only a 100MB file
> using "hdfs dfs -put - foo.txt". And of course using distcp or
> multiple -put workloads HDFS can saturate multiple GigE links.
>
> -andy
>
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Try picking up a single operation say "hadoop dfs -ls" and start
> profiling.
> > - Time the client JVM is taking to start. Enable debug logging on the
> > client side by exporting HADOOP_ROOT_LOGGER=DEBUG,CONSOLE
> > - Time between the client starting and the namenode audit logs showing
> the
> > read request. Also enable debug logging on the daemons too.
> > - Also, you can wget the namenode web pages and see how fast they
> return.
> >
> > To repeat what is already obvious, It is most likely related to your
> network
> > setup and/or configuration.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > +Vinod
> >
> > On Oct 10, 2012, at 12:20 AM, Alexey wrote:
> >
> > ok, here you go:
> > I have 3 servers:
> > datanode on server 1, 2, 3
> > namenode on server 1
> > secondarynamenode on server 2
> >
> > all servers are at the hetzner datacenter and connected through 100Mbit
> > link, pings between them about 0.1ms
> >
> > each server has 24Gb ram and intel core i7 3Ghz CPU
> > disk is 700Gb RAID
> >
> > the bindings related configuration is the following:
> > server 1:
> > core-site.xml
> > --------------------------------------
> > <name>fs.default.name</name>
> > <value>hdfs://5.6.7.11:8020</value>
> > --------------------------------------
> >
> > hdfs-site.xml
> > --------------------------------------
> > <name>dfs.datanode.address</name>
> > <value>0.0.0.0:50010</value>
> >
> > <name>dfs.datanode.http.address</name>
> > <value>0.0.0.0:50075</value>
> >
> > <name>dfs.http.address</name>
> > <value>5.6.7.11:50070</value>
> >
> > <name>dfs.secondary.https.port</name>
> > <value>50490</value>
> >
> > <name>dfs.https.port</name>
> > <value>50470</value>
> >
> > <name>dfs.https.address</name>
> > <value>5.6.7.11:50470</value>
> >
> > <name>dfs.secondary.http.address</name>
> > <value>5.6.7.12:50090</value>
> > --------------------------------------
> >
> > server 2:
> > core-site.xml
> > --------------------------------------
> > <name>fs.default.name</name>
> > <value>hdfs://5.6.7.11:8020</value>
> > --------------------------------------
> >
> > hdfs-site.xml
> > --------------------------------------
> > <name>dfs.datanode.address</name>
> > <value>0.0.0.0:50010</value>
> >
> > <name>dfs.datanode.http.address</name>
> > <value>0.0.0.0:50075</value>
> >
> > <name>dfs.http.address</name>
> > <value>5.6.7.11:50070</value>
> >
> > <name>dfs.secondary.https.port</name>
> > <value>50490</value>
> >
> > <name>dfs.https.port</name>
> > <value>50470</value>
> >
> > <name>dfs.https.address</name>
> > <value>5.6.7.11:50470</value>
> >
> > <name>dfs.secondary.http.address</name>
> > <value>5.6.7.12:50090</value>
> > --------------------------------------
> >
> > server 3:
> > core-site.xml
> > --------------------------------------
> > <name>fs.default.name</name>
> > <value>hdfs://5.6.7.11:8020</value>
> > --------------------------------------
> >
> > hdfs-site.xml
> > --------------------------------------
> > <name>dfs.datanode.address</name>
> > <value>0.0.0.0:50010</value>
-
Re: DFS respond very slowVinod Kumar Vavilapalli 2012-10-16, 02:36
I just realized one more thing. You mentioned "disk is 700Gb RAID". How many disks overall? What RAID configuration? Usually we advocate JBOD with hadoop to avoid performance hits with RAID, and let HDFS itself take care of replication. May be you are running into this?
Thanks,
+Vinod
On Oct 15, 2012, at 5:22 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli wrote:
> Try picking up a single operation say "hadoop dfs -ls" and start profiling.
> - Time the client JVM is taking to start. Enable debug logging on the client side by exporting HADOOP_ROOT_LOGGER=DEBUG,CONSOLE
> - Time between the client starting and the namenode audit logs showing the read request. Also enable debug logging on the daemons too.
> - Also, you can wget the namenode web pages and see how fast they return.
>
> To repeat what is already obvious, It is most likely related to your network setup and/or configuration.
>
> Thanks,
> +Vinod
>
> On Oct 10, 2012, at 12:20 AM, Alexey wrote:
>
>> ok, here you go:
>> I have 3 servers:
>> datanode on server 1, 2, 3
>> namenode on server 1
>> secondarynamenode on server 2
>>
>> all servers are at the hetzner datacenter and connected through 100Mbit
>> link, pings between them about 0.1ms
>>
>> each server has 24Gb ram and intel core i7 3Ghz CPU
>> disk is 700Gb RAID
>>
>> the bindings related configuration is the following:
>> server 1:
>> core-site.xml
>> --------------------------------------
>> <name>fs.default.name</name>
>> <value>hdfs://5.6.7.11:8020</value>
>> --------------------------------------
>>
>> hdfs-site.xml
>> --------------------------------------
>> <name>dfs.datanode.address</name>
>> <value>0.0.0.0:50010</value>
>>
>> <name>dfs.datanode.http.address</name>
>> <value>0.0.0.0:50075</value>
>>
>> <name>dfs.http.address</name>
>> <value>5.6.7.11:50070</value>
>>
>> <name>dfs.secondary.https.port</name>
>> <value>50490</value>
>>
>> <name>dfs.https.port</name>
>> <value>50470</value>
>>
>> <name>dfs.https.address</name>
>> <value>5.6.7.11:50470</value>
>>
>> <name>dfs.secondary.http.address</name>
>> <value>5.6.7.12:50090</value>
>> --------------------------------------
>>
>> server 2:
>> core-site.xml
>> --------------------------------------
>> <name>fs.default.name</name>
>> <value>hdfs://5.6.7.11:8020</value>
>> --------------------------------------
>>
>> hdfs-site.xml
>> --------------------------------------
>> <name>dfs.datanode.address</name>
>> <value>0.0.0.0:50010</value>
>>
>> <name>dfs.datanode.http.address</name>
>> <value>0.0.0.0:50075</value>
>>
>> <name>dfs.http.address</name>
>> <value>5.6.7.11:50070</value>
>>
>> <name>dfs.secondary.https.port</name>
>> <value>50490</value>
>>
>> <name>dfs.https.port</name>
>> <value>50470</value>
>>
>> <name>dfs.https.address</name>
>> <value>5.6.7.11:50470</value>
>>
>> <name>dfs.secondary.http.address</name>
>> <value>5.6.7.12:50090</value>
>> --------------------------------------
>>
>> server 3:
>> core-site.xml
>> --------------------------------------
>> <name>fs.default.name</name>
>> <value>hdfs://5.6.7.11:8020</value>
>> --------------------------------------
>>
>> hdfs-site.xml
>> --------------------------------------
>> <name>dfs.datanode.address</name>
>> <value>0.0.0.0:50010</value>
>>
>> <name>dfs.datanode.http.address</name>
>> <value>0.0.0.0:50075</value>
>>
>> <name>dfs.http.address</name>
>> <value>127.0.0.1:50070</value>
>>
>> <name>dfs.secondary.https.port</name>
>> <value>50490</value>
>>
>> <name>dfs.https.port</name>
>> <value>50470</value>
>>
>> <name>dfs.https.address</name>
>> <value>127.0.0.1:50470</value>
>>
>> <name>dfs.secondary.http.address</name>
>> <value>5.6.7.12:50090</value>
>> --------------------------------------
>>
>> netstat output:
>> server 1
>>> tcp 0 0 5.6.7.11:8020 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 10870/java
>>> tcp 0 0 5.6.7.11:50070 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 10870/java
>>> tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:50010 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 10997/java
