|
|
-
Re: Exec source doesn't flush the last datalarryzhang 2013-03-13, 03:34
Just add one thing, I use flume-ng 1.3.1
On 03/13/2013 11:33 AM, larryzhang wrote: > Hi, > I did a simple test about exec source, and found it didn't flush > the last data. Here's the steps: > *a. create the source file 1.test, which has sequence number from 1 to > 15, like this:* > ---------- > 1 > 2 > ... > 15 > ---------- > *b. create the configure file flume_simple.conf like this:* > ------------------------- > a1.sources = r1 > a1.channels = c1 > a1.sinks = k1 > > a1.sources.r1.type = exec > a1.sources.r1.command = tail -n +0 -F > /opt/scripts/tvhadoop/flume/flume-1.3.0/source/1.test > a1.sources.r1.channels = c1 > a1.sources.r1.batchSize = 10 > > a1.channels.c1.type = memory > > a1.sinks.k1.type = file_roll > a1.sinks.k1.channel = c1 > a1.sinks.k1.sink.directory = /opt/scripts/tvhadoop/flume/flume-1.3.0/sink > --------------------- > *c. run flume with command: * > bin/flume-ng agent --conf conf -f conf/flume_simple.conf > -Dflume.root.logger=DEBUG,console -n a1 > > After more than 1 minute(file roll interval), I check the output > directory, there are 2 files, one has number from 1 to 10, and the > other has nothing. > *I think this is because the batchSize was set to 10, the the last 5 > numbers didn't get flushed and lost.* Even I apply the patch in > 'https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1819', nothing changed. > If I debug into the code, *I found the red codes outside while clause > never get executed*. > ---------------- > while ((line = reader.readLine()) != null) { > counterGroup.incrementAndGet("exec.lines.read"); > eventList.add(EventBuilder.withBody(line.getBytes())); > if(eventList.size() >= bufferCount) { > channelProcessor.processEventBatch(eventList); > eventList.clear(); > } > } > if(!eventList.isEmpty()) { > channelProcessor.processEventBatch(eventList); > } > -------------- > In my scenario, the source log files are divided by hour, so I > need to change the file name in flume configure file. Because of the > above bug, I can only set the batchsize of execSource to 1, which > significantly slowdown the through pass. I wonder how to solve this > problem. Any suggestions are most welcomed. > Best Regards, > larry > > > |