Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
HBase, mail # dev - DISCUSS : HFile V3 proposal for tags in 0.96


+
ramkrishna vasudevan 2013-07-18, 17:14
+
Ted Yu 2013-07-18, 17:23
+
Jimmy Xiang 2013-07-18, 17:55
+
ramkrishna vasudevan 2013-07-19, 04:29
+
Ted Yu 2013-07-19, 04:40
+
ramkrishna vasudevan 2013-07-19, 04:57
+
Ted Yu 2013-07-19, 05:00
+
Stack 2013-07-19, 05:12
+
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-07-19, 11:02
+
ramkrishna vasudevan 2013-07-19, 11:11
+
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-07-19, 11:23
+
Anoop John 2013-07-19, 11:51
+
ramkrishna vasudevan 2013-07-19, 12:00
+
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-07-19, 13:09
+
Ted Yu 2013-07-19, 14:18
+
Anoop John 2013-07-19, 15:12
+
ramkrishna vasudevan 2013-07-19, 15:05
+
Andrew Purtell 2013-07-19, 16:27
+
Ted Yu 2013-07-19, 16:32
+
Anoop John 2013-07-19, 17:13
+
Ted Yu 2013-07-19, 17:35
Copy link to this message
-
Re: DISCUSS : HFile V3 proposal for tags in 0.96
Elliott Clark 2013-07-19, 17:52
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If cell tagging goes to 0.96, that would open door to many scenarios.

I don't understand why it has to be in 0.96. The rpc already has the
ability to signal what it can handle.  We have the ability to fallback
(all the way to protobuf kv's if need be).  We already have the
ability to version hfile.  We've already all agreed on what features
would make the train for 0.96.
+
Andrew Purtell 2013-07-19, 18:01
+
Elliott Clark 2013-07-19, 21:02
+
Andrew Purtell 2013-07-19, 22:34
+
Stack 2013-07-19, 23:31
+
ramkrishna vasudevan 2013-07-20, 02:10
+
Andrew Purtell 2013-07-22, 17:23
+
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-07-23, 22:43
+
Andrew Purtell 2013-07-24, 17:33
+
ramkrishna vasudevan 2013-07-25, 18:09
+
Andrew Purtell 2013-07-19, 16:48
+
Ted Yu 2013-07-24, 17:30
+
Andrew Purtell 2013-07-19, 16:25