My mistake, I thought the agreement or interest in Phoenix earlier was in
the context of the 0.7 BOM. Thanks for considering it even now.
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I said earlier - I am ok. Just brought it up for the sake of full
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 03:56PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > I don't see Phoenix on the BOM for 0.7, btw
> > > Not that I am picky, just saying that is hasn't been in the scope of
> > > release.
> > I'm personally +1 to adding it to the BOM this late in the game.
> > My own rule of thumb is that anything NEW added to the BOM
> > is pretty easy to do (provided code is +1ed, etc.) where anything
> > that used to exist in a previous release that needs a version
> > bump is a much trickier proposition.
> > Thanks,
> > Roman.
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)