Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
HBase >> mail # dev >> Snapshots branch trunk merging


+
Jonathan Hsieh 2013-02-12, 22:12
+
lars hofhansl 2013-02-12, 23:42
+
Ted Yu 2013-02-13, 00:59
+
Jonathan Hsieh 2013-02-13, 01:30
+
Jonathan Hsieh 2013-02-12, 23:45
+
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-02-12, 22:19
Copy link to this message
-
Re: Snapshots branch trunk merging
The mega patch is based on trunk.

You can apply it on latest trunk.

Cheers

On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi Jon,
>
> If I want to give it a try, do I "simply" have to extract for the GIT
> link you sent and build from there?
>
> JM
>
> 2013/2/12, Jonathan Hsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > We did a branch merge of the snapshot branch (hbase-6055 and
> > hbase-7290 combined) with trunk on 2/1/13.  This merge initially had
> > several always broken tests but  since then Ted, Matteo and myself
> > fixed all the always-broken unit tests.  I've merged again today
> > 2/12/13 [1], and posted a patch on HBASE-7290 for the hadoopqa bot to
> > run.
> >
> > There are primarily four of us who worked on this branch -- Jesse Y,
> > Matteo, Ted Yu and myself, so if we each +1, technically we would have
> > the 3 +1's required and could merge.  I wanted to solicit +1's from
> > the four who worked  on it (all committers now) and also find out if
> > anyone else has started reviewing the code or intends to in the next
> > few days.  It is a large patch (1.3MB) that I can post on review
> > board, but it may be easier to understand by going to the different
> > individual jiras (some of which have design docs).   Generally we've
> > been using a looser of review then commit for each of the subtasks. If
> > I get clean test runs from the QA bot and +1's from the folks who
> > worked on it or planned on reviewing it, I'd like merge sooner rather
> > than later.
> >
> > On the unit testing front, I've personally gotten one error-free unit
> > tests runs runs and one with a failure in hbase-examples:
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.coprocessor.example.TestBulkDeleteProtocol.testBulkDeleteFamily.
> >
> > On the system testing side, I've been testing the pre-merge version
> > outlined by Aleks [2] and it had been fairly robust on a 5 node
> > cluster with fault injection.  I've also done some testing on a 20
> > node cluster (no fault injection) and a few runs on a 100 node cluster
> > where the snapshoting feature has been robust.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jon.
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/jmhsieh/hbase/tree/snapshot-merge-0212
> > [2] http://markmail.org/message/pdbkq654ipuxyt6a
> >
> > --
> > // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> > // Software Engineer, Cloudera
> > // [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
+
Jonathan Hsieh 2013-02-12, 22:27
+
Ted Yu 2013-02-12, 23:28
+
Andrew Purtell 2013-02-13, 00:40
+
Stack 2013-02-13, 06:41
+
Jonathan Hsieh 2013-02-14, 14:44
+
Jonathan Hsieh 2013-02-20, 20:03
+
Jesse Yates 2013-02-20, 21:50
+
Lars Hofhansl 2013-02-13, 04:00