Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Hive >> mail # dev >> How long will we support Hadoop 0.20.2?

Copy link to this message
Re: How long will we support Hadoop 0.20.2?
BTW: I am very likely to install hive 0.12 on hadoop 0.20.2 clusters. I
have been running hive since version 0.2. I have been running hadoop since
version 0.17.2. After 0.17.2 I moved to 0.20.2. Since then the hadoop has
seemingly has 10's of releases. 0.21, 0.21.append (Dead on arrival) .
cloudera this, cloudera that, yahoo hadoop distribution (dead on arrival),, 1? 2.0? 2.1. None of them really have much shelf
life or a very clear upgrade path.

The only thing that has remained constant for our environment is hive and
hadoop 0.20.2. I have been happily just upgrading hive on these clusters
for years now.

So in a nutshell, I'm a long time committer, and I actively support and
develop hive on hadoop 0.20.2 clusters, I do not see supporting the shims
as complicated or difficult.

On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Owen O'Malley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Edward Capriolo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >wrote:
> > I am not fine with dropping it. I still run it in several places.
> >
> The question is not whether you run Hadoop 0.20.2, but whether you are
> likely to install Hive 0.12 on those very old clusters.
> >
> > Believe it or now many people still run 0.20.2. I believe (correct me If
> I
> > am wrong) facebook is still running a heavily patch 0.20.2.
> >
> It is more accurate to say that Facebook is running a fork of Hadoop where
> the last common point was Hadoop 0.20.1. I haven't heard anyone (other than
> you in this thread) say they are running 0.20.2 in years.
> > I could see dropping 0.20.2 if it was a huge burden but I do not see it
> > that way, it work's it is reliable, and it is a known quantity.
> >
> It is a large burden in that we have relatively complicated shims and a
> lack of testing. Unless you are signing up to test every release on 0.20.2
> we don't have anyone doing the relevant testing.
> -- Owen