Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Hadoop, mail # dev - [DISCUSS] Hadoop SSO/Token Server Components


Copy link to this message
-
Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop SSO/Token Server Components
Larry McCay 2013-09-03, 22:55
Very good.
Thank you, Chris!
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Chris Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 5:20 AM, Larry McCay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > One outstanding question for me - how do we go about getting the branches
> > created?
>
> Once a group has converged on a purpose- ideally with some initial
> code from JIRA- please go ahead and create the feature branch in svn.
> There's no ceremony. -C
>
> > On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Chris Nauroth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Near the bottom of the bylaws, it states that addition of a "New Branch
> >> Committer" requires "Lazy consensus of active PMC members."  I think
> this
> >> means that you'll need to get a PMC member to sponsor the vote for you.
> >>  Regular committer votes happen on the private PMC mailing list, and I
> >> assume it would be the same for a branch committer vote.
> >>
> >> http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html
> >>
> >> Chris Nauroth
> >> Hortonworks
> >> http://hortonworks.com/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Larry McCay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > That sounds perfect!
> >> > I have been thinking of late that we would maybe need an incubator
> >> project
> >> > or something for this - which would be unfortunate.
> >> >
> >> > This would allow us to move much more quickly with a set of patches
> >> broken
> >> > up into consumable/understandable chunks that are made functional more
> >> > easily within the branch.
> >> > I assume that we need to start a separate thread for DISCUSS or VOTE
> to
> >> > start that process - correct?
> >> >
> >> > On Aug 6, 2013, at 4:15 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > yep, that is what I meant. Thanks Chris
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Chris Nauroth <
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > >wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> Perhaps this is also a good opportunity to try out the new "branch
> >> > >> committers" clause in the bylaws, enabling non-committers who are
> >> > working
> >> > >> on this to commit to the feature branch.
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201308.mbox/%3CCACO5Y4we4d8knB_xU3a=hr2gbeQO5m3vaU+[EMAIL PROTECTED]%3E
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Chris Nauroth
> >> > >> Hortonworks
> >> > >> http://hortonworks.com/
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > >>> wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >>> Larry,
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Sorry for the delay answering. Thanks for laying down things,
> yes, it
> >> > >> makes
> >> > >>> sense.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Given the large scope of the changes, number of JIRAs and number
> of
> >> > >>> developers involved, wouldn't make sense to create a feature
> branch
> >> for
> >> > >> all
> >> > >>> this work not to destabilize (more ;) trunk?
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Thanks again.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Larry McCay <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >
> >> > >>> wrote:
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>> The following JIRA was filed to provide a token and basic
> authority
> >> > >>>> implementation for this effort:
> >> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9781
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> I have attached an initial patch though have yet to submit it as
> one
> >> > >>> since
> >> > >>>> it is dependent on the patch for CMF that was posted to:
> >> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9534
> >> > >>>> and this patch still has a couple outstanding issues - javac
> >> warnings
> >> > >> for
> >> > >>>> com.sun classes for certification generation and 11 javadoc
> >> warnings.
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> Please feel free to review the patches and raise any questions or
> >> > >>> concerns
> >> > >>>> related to them.
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> On Jul 26, 2013, at 8:59 PM, Larry McCay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >> > >> wrote:
> >> > >>>>

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
and delete it from your system. Thank You.