All,
   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all on a page, here:

http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/

Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.

My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.

In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will automatically roll over to your next choice.

-- Owen

My vote: 5 1 6 2 3 4

tl;dr regarding STV - since we're only selecting one winner, STV reduces to
instant-runoff voting.

--
Aaron T. Myers
Software Engineer, Cloudera

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> All,
>   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
> will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
>

4,2,6,1,3,5
--
  Take care,
Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik
2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616  6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622

Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author,
and do not necessarily represent the views of any company the author
might be affiliated with at the moment of writing.

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 20:19, Owen O'Malley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
>

Who is allowed to vote in this? Committers? PMC? Everyone?

My vote: 5, 2, 6, 3, 1, 4

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> All,
>   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
> will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
>
--
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera

My vote 4, 5, 2, 3, 1, 6

Thanks
Amareshwari

On 6/15/11 9:57 AM, "Todd Lipcon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Who is allowed to vote in this? Committers? PMC? Everyone?

My vote: 5, 2, 6, 3, 1, 4

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> All,
>   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
> will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
>
--
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera

5,4,2,3,6,1

On Jun 15, 2011, at 1:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:

> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/

When casting your vote, please keep in mind that the vast majority of the
time the "Powered By" logo will be displayed in a size much smaller than
what is displayed on Owen's link. Here's a similar page which shows all the
logos at a few different sizes:

http://people.apache.org/~atm/hadoop-powered-by/

(This is the reason I prefer choice #5 to all others. I believe it'll be
more visually distinct from the project logo at small sizes, which was the
point of developing a "Powered By" logo in the first place.)

--
Aaron T. Myers
Software Engineer, Cloudera

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> All,
>   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
> will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
>

4,2,6,1,5,3

:)

-- Joijoide

****************************************************************************
***********
This e-mail and attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI,
which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed
above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including,
but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or
dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient's) is
prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by
phone or email immediately and delete it!

________________________________

-----Original Message-----
From: Owen O'Malley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 8:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [VOTE] Powered by Logo

All,
   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
all on a page, here:

http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/

Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing
is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.

My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.

In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't
need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will
automatically roll over to your next choice.

-- Owen

4,3,5,6,2,1

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Jithendranath
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 4,2,6,1,5,3
>
> :)
>
> -- Joijoide
>
> ****************************************************************************
> ***********
> This e-mail and attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI,
> which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed
> above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including,
> but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or
> dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient's) is
> prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by
> phone or email immediately and delete it!
>
> ________________________________
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Owen O'Malley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 8:49 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
>
> All,
>   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing
> is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't
> need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will
> automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
>
>

--
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon

5, 4, 6, 2, 3, 1

Cheers,

Bijeet

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Owen O'Malley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 8:49 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
> >
> > All,
> >   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> > all on a page, here:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
> >
> > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> > voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> thing
> > is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
> >
> > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
> >
> > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> don't
> > need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will
> > automatically roll over to your next choice.
> >
> > -- Owen
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> @eddieyoon
>

My vote:

5,4,3,2,6,1

IMO, 5 is much more polished than the rest, but I like the whole elephant in 4.

5 4 2 6 3 1
- Aaron

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:57 PM, Daniel Jue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> My vote:
>
> 5,4,3,2,6,1
>
> IMO, 5 is much more polished than the rest, but I like the whole elephant
> in 4.
>

6, 4, 5, 2, 1, 3
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Daniel Jue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My vote:
>
> 5,4,3,2,6,1
>
> IMO, 5 is much more polished than the rest, but I like the whole elephant in 4.
>

4, 2, 6

Yes.  That isn't enough votes, but I think that the other logos don't cut
the mustard for various reasons.  5 is a recycled product logo and I don't
think the others make the required visual case.

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:40 AM, Amareshwari Sri Ramadasu <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> My vote 4, 5, 2, 3, 1, 6
>
> Thanks
> Amareshwari
>
> On 6/15/11 9:57 AM, "Todd Lipcon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Who is allowed to vote in this? Committers? PMC? Everyone?
>
> My vote: 5, 2, 6, 3, 1, 4
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > All,
> >   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> > all on a page, here:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
> >
> > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> > voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> > thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
> >
> > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
> >
> > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> > don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
> > will automatically roll over to your next choice.
> >
> > -- Owen
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Todd Lipcon
> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>
>

5, 2, 4, 6, 1, 3

Doug

On 06/15/2011 05:19 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> All,
>    We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
>

On 15/06/11 04:19, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> All,
>     We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
>
my vote: 4, 5, 2

5 6 4 2 3 1

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Owen O'Malley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
>

--
Harsh J

5 only

-dhruba

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Harsh J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 5 6 4 2 3 1
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Owen O'Malley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > All,
> >   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> all on a page, here:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
> >
> > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
> >
> > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
> >
> > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
> will automatically roll over to your next choice.
> >
> > -- Owen
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Harsh J
>

--
Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba

5 6 2 1 4 3

2011/6/15 Dhruba Borthakur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> 5 only
>
> -dhruba
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Harsh J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > 5 6 4 2 3 1
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Owen O'Malley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > All,
> > >   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put
> them
> > all on a page, here:
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
> > >
> > > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> > voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> > thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
> > >
> > > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
> > >
> > > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> > don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
> > will automatically roll over to your next choice.
> > >
> > > -- Owen
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Harsh J
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba
>

On Jun 14, 2011, at 9:27 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:

> Who is allowed to vote in this? Committers? PMC? Everyone?

Sorry, I should have been clearer. Everyone is allowed and encouraged to vote. Only the PMC votes are binding, however.

-- Owen

On Jun 14, 2011, at 11:57 PM, Daniel Jue wrote:

> IMO, 5 is much more polished than the rest, but I like the whole elephant in 4.

Ted has offered to make a more polished version of 4, if there is interest in adopting it.

-- Owen

On Jun 14, 2011, at 11:36 PM, Aaron T. Myers wrote:

> When casting your vote, please keep in mind that the vast majority of the
> time the "Powered By" logo will be displayed in a size much smaller than
> what is displayed on Owen's link.

That's a really good point Aaron. The fonts in all of the examples are probably smaller than they should be to be very readable in the 4th (100 pixel width) column.

-- Owen

On Jun 15, 2011, at 1:44 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:

> 4, 2, 6
>
> Yes.  That isn't enough votes, but I think that the other logos don't cut
> the mustard for various reasons.  5 is a recycled product logo and I don't
> think the others make the required visual case.
+1

4,2,6

4,5,1,2,6,3

Devaraj K

-----Original Message-----
From: Owen O'Malley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 8:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
On Jun 14, 2011, at 9:27 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:

> Who is allowed to vote in this? Committers? PMC? Everyone?

Sorry, I should have been clearer. Everyone is allowed and encouraged to
vote. Only the PMC votes are binding, however.

-- Owen

My vote: 4,5,1,2,3,6

Tom
On 6/14/11 10:19 PM, "Owen O'Malley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> All,
>    We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all
> on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting,
> let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is
> to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't
> need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will
> automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>

My vote: 5, 4, 2, 6, 3, 1
On 6/15/11 8:55 AM, Marcos Ortiz wrote:
> On 06/15/2011 07:44 AM, Harsh J wrote:
>> 5 6 4 2 3 1
> My vote
> 5, 4, 6, 3, 1, 2
>

My vote 5 3 6 1 2 4

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Thomas Graves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My vote: 4,5,1,2,3,6
>
> Tom
>
>
> On 6/14/11 10:19 PM, "Owen O'Malley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>    We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all
>> on a page, here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>>
>> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting,
>> let's use single transferable vote ( STV
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is
>> to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>>
>> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>>
>> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't
>> need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will
>> automatically roll over to your next choice.
>>
>> -- Owen
>>
>>
>
>

On 06/15/2011 07:44 AM, Harsh J wrote:
> 5 6 4 2 3 1
My vote
5, 4, 6, 3, 1, 2

--

Marcos Lu�s Ort�z Valmaseda
  Software Engineer (UCI)
  http://marcosluis2186.posterous.com
  http://twitter.com/marcosluis2186

5 2 1 3 6 4

On 15 June 2011 08:54, Eli Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> My vote 5 3 6 1 2 4
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Thomas Graves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > My vote: 4,5,1,2,3,6
> >
> > Tom
> >
> >
> > On 6/14/11 10:19 PM, "Owen O'Malley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> All,
> >>    We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put
> them all
> >> on a page, here:
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
> >>
> >> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> voting,
> >> let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> thing is
> >> to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
> >>
> >> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
> >>
> >> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> don't
> >> need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will
> >> automatically roll over to your next choice.
> >>
> >> -- Owen
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>

--
Henry Robinson
Software Engineer
Cloudera
415-994-6679

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 1:44 AM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 4, 2, 6
>
> Yes.  That isn't enough votes, but I think that the other logos don't cut
> the mustard for various reasons.  5 is a recycled product logo and I don't
> think the others make the required visual case.

5 is not a product logo, nor was it. Aaron Nuton contributed this and
the Hive logo (which was subsequently adopted) to Apache.
See MAPREDUCE-484 and
http://www.cloudera.com/blog/2009/04/hive-and-jobtracker-needed-logos.
This logo was used as an icon in Hue (Hadoop user interface) which is
an Apache licensed open source project.

Thanks,
Eli

4,5,6,3,2,1

PS: Powered logo would be advertised by users. Their vote should count :)

----- Original Message ----
From: Owen O'Malley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue, June 14, 2011 8:19:18 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Powered by Logo

All,
   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all on
a page, here:

http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/

Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting,
let's use single transferable vote ( STV
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is
to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.

My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.

In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't
need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will
automatically roll over to your next choice.

-- Owen

I have put the votes together in a form of a spreadsheet
  http://tinyurl.com/3j6629h
for the convenience of watching the race.

Statistics fascinates me usually. Stay tuned.
--
  Take care,
Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik
2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616  6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622

Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author,
and do not necessarily represent the views of any company the author
might be affiliated with at the moment of writing.

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 20:19, Owen O'Malley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
>

4, 2, 1, 5, 6, 3

Tom

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
>

My vote: 4,5,1,2,6,3
--Jeff
On 6/14/11 10:19 PM, "Owen O'Malley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> All,
>    We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all
> on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting,
> let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is
> to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't
> need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will
> automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>

My vote:

5, 4, 1, 6, 2, 3

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffrey Naisbitt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 11:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo

My vote: 4,5,1,2,6,3
--Jeff
On 6/14/11 10:19 PM, "Owen O'Malley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> All,
>    We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all
> on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting,
> let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is
> to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't
> need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will
> automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>

My vote: 2, 4, 5, 6, 3, 1.

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> All,
>   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
> will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
>

2 6 5 1 4 3

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Anupam Seth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My vote:
>
> 5, 4, 1, 6, 2, 3
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeffrey Naisbitt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 11:44 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
>
> My vote: 4,5,1,2,6,3
> --Jeff
>
>
> On 6/14/11 10:19 PM, "Owen O'Malley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>    We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all
>> on a page, here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>>
>> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting,
>> let's use single transferable vote ( STV
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is
>> to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>>
>> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>>
>> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't
>> need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will
>> automatically roll over to your next choice.
>>
>> -- Owen
>>
>>
>
>

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Owen O'Malley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Ted has offered to make a more polished version of 4, if there is interest
> in adopting it.
>

On that note, is it the case that the outcome of this vote is to adopt the
"style" of the winning option? Or the precise pixels? I assume the former.

I ask because when posting option #5 on the original JIRA, Aaron Newton also
posted a variant optimized for very small treatments:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12458850/powered-by-hadoop-small.png

--
Aaron T. Myers
Software Engineer, Cloudera

5, 4, 2, 6

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> All,
>   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
> will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
>
--
thanks
ashish

Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog
My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal

2, 4
On 6/14/11 8:19 PM, "Owen O'Malley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> All,
>    We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all
> on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting,
> let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is
> to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't
> need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will
> automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>

On Jun 15, 2011, at 9:58 AM, Aaron T. Myers wrote:

> On that note, is it the case that the outcome of this vote is to adopt the
> "style" of the winning option? Or the precise pixels? I assume the former.

It is about the style. Technically, it would require a vote to replace the precise pixels, but usually two alternatives in the same style one is clearly better and we can make the decision without an explicit vote.

-- Owen

5, 6, 1, 3, 4, 2

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Suresh Srinivas
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2, 4
>
>
> On 6/14/11 8:19 PM, "Owen O'Malley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>    We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all
>> on a page, here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>>
>> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting,
>> let's use single transferable vote ( STV
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is
>> to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>>
>> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>>
>> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't
>> need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will
>> automatically roll over to your next choice.
>>
>> -- Owen
>>
>>
>
>

2, 4, 6.
mahadev

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 5, 6, 1, 3, 4, 2
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Suresh Srinivas
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 2, 4
>>
>>
>> On 6/14/11 8:19 PM, "Owen O'Malley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> All,
>>>    We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all
>>> on a page, here:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>>>
>>> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting,
>>> let's use single transferable vote ( STV
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is
>>> to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>>>
>>> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>>>
>>> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't
>>> need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will
>>> automatically roll over to your next choice.
>>>
>>> -- Owen
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

--
thanks
mahadev
@mahadevkonar

4, 2

Regards,
Tsz-Wo

________________________________
From: Owen O'Malley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue, June 14, 2011 8:19:18 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Powered by Logo

All,
   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all on
a page, here:

http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/

Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting,
let's use single transferable vote ( STV
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is
to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.

My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.

In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't
need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will
automatically roll over to your next choice.

-- Owen

5, 4, 2, 3, 1, 6

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> All,
>   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
> will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
>

4, 2, 6, 1

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:22 AM, James Warren <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 5, 4, 2, 3, 1, 6
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > All,
> >   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> > all on a page, here:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
> >
> > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> > voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> > thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
> >
> > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
> >
> > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> > don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
> > will automatically roll over to your next choice.
> >
> > -- Owen
> >
> >
> >
>

2, 4

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Bochun Bai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 6, 4, 5, 2, 1, 3
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Daniel Jue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My vote:
> >
> > 5,4,3,2,6,1
> >
> > IMO, 5 is much more polished than the rest, but I like the whole elephant
> in 4.
> >
>

 4, 2, 6, 1, 3, 5

On 06/15/2011 11:54 AM, Bartosz Solowiej wrote:
> 2, 4
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Bochun Bai<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  wrote:
>
>> 6, 4, 5, 2, 1, 3
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Daniel Jue<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  wrote:
>>> My vote:
>>>
>>> 5,4,3,2,6,1
>>>
>>> IMO, 5 is much more polished than the rest, but I like the whole elephant
>> in 4.

4, 2, 6

2,4,6,1,3,5

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:44 AM, M. C. Srivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 4, 2, 6, 1
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:22 AM, James Warren <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > 5, 4, 2, 3, 1, 6
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > All,
> > >   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put
> them
> > > all on a page, here:
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
> > >
> > > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> > > voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> > > thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
> > >
> > > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
> > >
> > > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> > > don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your
> vote
> > > will automatically roll over to your next choice.
> > >
> > > -- Owen
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

I only like 4. A more polished version would be great. Maybe with
"Hadoop" instead of "Apache Hadoop". And maybe with a different font :)

On 06/15/11 16:35, Owen O'Malley wrote:
>
> On Jun 14, 2011, at 11:57 PM, Daniel Jue wrote:
>
>> IMO, 5 is much more polished than the rest, but I like the whole elephant in 4.
>
> Ted has offered to make a more polished version of 4, if there is interest in adopting it.
>
> -- Owen
--
Simone Leo
Data Fusion - Distributed Computing
CRS4
POLARIS - Building #1
Piscina Manna
I-09010 Pula (CA) - Italy
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crs4.it

2, 4, 5, 3, 6, 1

My vote: 2, 4, 5

-C

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
>

5, 3, 2, 4, 6, 1

On Jun 15, 2011, at 5:39 PM, Chris Douglas wrote:

> My vote: 2, 4, 5
>
> -C
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> All,
>>   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all on a page, here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>>
>> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>>
>> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>>
>> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>>
>> -- Owen
>>
>>
>>

It should look something like this:
http://api.ning.com/files/6tMSBWmZ67YKGzfS0NBp6Xt67YUi5L4ft6OZRsIrq-3EO40OP0mqSJs4b3*5QV0V7shmKnK44LzEGzNSvmDUFqCv6hirrSWX/1105100WC001.jpeg

But given the choices:  6 2 4 5 1 3

I put 6 first because it's the only one having Apache logo on it.
I think whatever choice wins the feather should be put on it.

Thanks,
--Konstantin
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> All,
>   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
> will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
>

What are you trying to say? Let's promote a brutal muscling macho
power vs. a stuffed yet adorable animal? Think of the children, man!

It's been an interesting race: so far 49 people have casted their
votes. I think this is by far most alive discussion here!
--
  Take care,
Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik
2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616  6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622

Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author,
and do not necessarily represent the views of any company the author
might be affiliated with at the moment of writing.

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 17:57, Konstantin Shvachko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It should look something like this:
> http://api.ning.com/files/6tMSBWmZ67YKGzfS0NBp6Xt67YUi5L4ft6OZRsIrq-3EO40OP0mqSJs4b3*5QV0V7shmKnK44LzEGzNSvmDUFqCv6hirrSWX/1105100WC001.jpeg
>
> But given the choices:  6 2 4 5 1 3
>
> I put 6 first because it's the only one having Apache logo on it.
> I think whatever choice wins the feather should be put on it.
>
> Thanks,
> --Konstantin
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
>> all on a page, here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>>
>> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
>> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
>> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>>
>> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>>
>> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
>> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
>> will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>>
>> -- Owen
>>
>>
>>
>

2 4 5 6 1 3

It's not macho, it's the power coming from Hadoop.
The feather would classy on that background too.
And children need exercise, especially those dealing with Hadoop.
--Konstantin

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> What are you trying to say? Let's promote a brutal muscling macho
> power vs. a stuffed yet adorable animal? Think of the children, man!
>
> It's been an interesting race: so far 49 people have casted their
> votes. I think this is by far most alive discussion here!
> --
>   Take care,
> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik
> 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616  6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622
>
> Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author,
> and do not necessarily represent the views of any company the author
> might be affiliated with at the moment of writing.
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 17:57, Konstantin Shvachko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > It should look something like this:
> >
> http://api.ning.com/files/6tMSBWmZ67YKGzfS0NBp6Xt67YUi5L4ft6OZRsIrq-3EO40OP0mqSJs4b3*5QV0V7shmKnK44LzEGzNSvmDUFqCv6hirrSWX/1105100WC001.jpeg
> >
> > But given the choices:  6 2 4 5 1 3
> >
> > I put 6 first because it's the only one having Apache logo on it.
> > I think whatever choice wins the feather should be put on it.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --Konstantin
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> All,
> >>   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> >> all on a page, here:
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
> >>
> >> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> >> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> >> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
> >>
> >> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
> >>
> >> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> >> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
> >> will automatically roll over to your next choice.
> >>
> >> -- Owen
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>

6,2,4

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Konstantin Shvachko
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> It's not macho, it's the power coming from Hadoop.
> The feather would classy on that background too.
> And children need exercise, especially those dealing with Hadoop.
> --Konstantin
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > What are you trying to say? Let's promote a brutal muscling macho
> > power vs. a stuffed yet adorable animal? Think of the children, man!
> >
> > It's been an interesting race: so far 49 people have casted their
> > votes. I think this is by far most alive discussion here!
> > --
> >   Take care,
> > Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik
> > 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616  6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622
> >
> > Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author,
> > and do not necessarily represent the views of any company the author
> > might be affiliated with at the moment of writing.
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 17:57, Konstantin Shvachko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > wrote:
> > > It should look something like this:
> > >
> >
> http://api.ning.com/files/6tMSBWmZ67YKGzfS0NBp6Xt67YUi5L4ft6OZRsIrq-3EO40OP0mqSJs4b3*5QV0V7shmKnK44LzEGzNSvmDUFqCv6hirrSWX/1105100WC001.jpeg
> > >
> > > But given the choices:  6 2 4 5 1 3
> > >
> > > I put 6 first because it's the only one having Apache logo on it.
> > > I think whatever choice wins the feather should be put on it.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > --Konstantin
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> All,
> > >>   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put
> them
> > >> all on a page, here:
> > >>
> > >> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
> > >>
> > >> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> > >> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> > >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> > >> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
> > >>
> > >> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
> > >>
> > >> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> > >> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your
> vote
> > >> will automatically roll over to your next choice.
> > >>
> > >> -- Owen
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
>

2.

Yep, the feather is bit ....arghhhhh.

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Ken Goodhope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 6,2,4
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Konstantin Shvachko
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> > It's not macho, it's the power coming from Hadoop.
> > The feather would classy on that background too.
> > And children need exercise, especially those dealing with Hadoop.
> > --Konstantin
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > What are you trying to say? Let's promote a brutal muscling macho
> > > power vs. a stuffed yet adorable animal? Think of the children, man!
> > >
> > > It's been an interesting race: so far 49 people have casted their
> > > votes. I think this is by far most alive discussion here!
> > > --
> > >   Take care,
> > > Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik
> > > 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616  6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622
> > >
> > > Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author,
> > > and do not necessarily represent the views of any company the author
> > > might be affiliated with at the moment of writing.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 17:57, Konstantin Shvachko <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > > It should look something like this:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://api.ning.com/files/6tMSBWmZ67YKGzfS0NBp6Xt67YUi5L4ft6OZRsIrq-3EO40OP0mqSJs4b3*5QV0V7shmKnK44LzEGzNSvmDUFqCv6hirrSWX/1105100WC001.jpeg
> > > >
> > > > But given the choices:  6 2 4 5 1 3
> > > >
> > > > I put 6 first because it's the only one having Apache logo on it.
> > > > I think whatever choice wins the feather should be put on it.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > --Konstantin
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> All,
> > > >>   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put
> > them
> > > >> all on a page, here:
> > > >>
> > > >> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
> > > >>
> > > >> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round
> of
> > > >> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> > > >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The
> important
> > > >> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
> > > >>
> > > >> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
> > > >>
> > > >> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV,
> you
> > > >> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your
> > vote
> > > >> will automatically roll over to your next choice.
> > > >>
> > > >> -- Owen
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 18:30, Konstantin Shvachko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's not macho, it's the power coming from Hadoop.
> The feather would classy on that background too.
> And children need exercise, especially those dealing with Hadoop.

Yeah, lotta heavy lifting here for sure...

> --Konstantin
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> What are you trying to say? Let's promote a brutal muscling macho
>> power vs. a stuffed yet adorable animal? Think of the children, man!
>>
>> It's been an interesting race: so far 49 people have casted their
>> votes. I think this is by far most alive discussion here!
>> --
>>   Take care,
>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik
>> 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616  6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622
>>
>> Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author,
>> and do not necessarily represent the views of any company the author
>> might be affiliated with at the moment of writing.
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 17:57, Konstantin Shvachko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> > It should look something like this:
>> >
>> http://api.ning.com/files/6tMSBWmZ67YKGzfS0NBp6Xt67YUi5L4ft6OZRsIrq-3EO40OP0mqSJs4b3*5QV0V7shmKnK44LzEGzNSvmDUFqCv6hirrSWX/1105100WC001.jpeg
>> >
>> > But given the choices:  6 2 4 5 1 3
>> >
>> > I put 6 first because it's the only one having Apache logo on it.
>> > I think whatever choice wins the feather should be put on it.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > --Konstantin
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> All,
>> >>   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
>> >> all on a page, here:
>> >>
>> >> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>> >>
>> >> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
>> >> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
>> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
>> >> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>> >>
>> >> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>> >>
>> >> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
>> >> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
>> >> will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>> >>
>> >> -- Owen
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>

Hey all,

My vote.. 6,3,5,4,2,1

Thanks,
Kyoji KATO

On 15 June 2011 12:19, Owen O'Malley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> All,
>   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
> will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
>

5, 6, 4, 2, 3, 1

esteban.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Kyoji KATO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> My vote.. 6,3,5,4,2,1
>
> Thanks,
> Kyoji KATO
>
> On 15 June 2011 12:19, Owen O'Malley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > All,
> >   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> > all on a page, here:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
> >
> > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> > voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> > thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
> >
> > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
> >
> > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> > don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
> > will automatically roll over to your next choice.
> >
> > -- Owen
> >
> >
> >

2
St.Ack

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
>

4, 2, 6, 1, 3, 5

5, 4, 2, 6, 1, 3

Cheers,

Pedro Figueiredo
Systems Engineer, Playfish
EA Interactive

Skype: pfiguk
Web: http://www.playfish.com
----
Electronic Arts Ltd, Registered office address Onslow House, Onslow Street, Guildford, Surrey, GU1 4TN, UK.  Reg. in England & Wales, Reg. No. 2057591

My vote: 4, 3, 2, 6, 5, 1

Thanks,
Venkatesh

On 6/15/11 8:49 AM, "Owen O'Malley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> All,
>    We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all
> on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting,
> let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is
> to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't
> need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will
> automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
>

5,2

> On 6/15/11 8:49 AM, "Owen O'Malley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all
>> on a page, here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>>
>> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting,
>> let's use single transferable vote ( STV
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is
>> to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>>
>> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>>
>> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't
>> need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will
>> automatically roll over to your next choice.
>>
>> -- Owen
>>
>>
>>
>

5,6,2,4,3,1

On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> 5,2
>
> > On 6/15/11 8:49 AM, "Owen O'Malley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> All,
> >>   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> all
> >> on a page, here:
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
> >>
> >> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> voting,
> >> let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> thing is
> >> to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
> >>
> >> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
> >>
> >> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> don't
> >> need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will
> >> automatically roll over to your next choice.
> >>
> >> -- Owen
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>

5,2

Cheers
Chad

I liked 4 a lot. My preference is: 4, 2, 6, 1, 3, 5

Regards,
giri

My vote (in order of course): 2, 6, 4, 3, 5, 1.
At 2011-06-15 11:19:18，"Owen OMalley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>All,
>   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all on a page, here:
>
>http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
>Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
>My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
>In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
>-- Owen
>
>

5, 6, 2.

Cheers,
bc

2 5 6

How the long the vote is suppose to be running? Usual 72 hours? Or longer?

The up-to date vote results are here http://tinyurl.com/3j6629h

Cos

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 08:19PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> All,
>    We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
>    all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing
> is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't
> need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will
> automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>

Lots of the same bitstring:

4,2,6,1,3,5

out of 6 choose 6, 720 permutations.
Just Sayin.

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:55 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How the long the vote is suppose to be running? Usual 72 hours? Or longer?
>
> The up-to date vote results are here http://tinyurl.com/3j6629h
>
> Cos
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 08:19PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
>> All,
>>    We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
>>    all on a page, here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>>
>> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
>> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing
>> is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>>
>> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>>
>> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't
>> need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will
>> automatically roll over to your next choice.
>>
>> -- Owen
>>
>>
>

On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> How the long the vote is suppose to be running? Usual 72 hours? Or longer?
http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html#Decision+Making

>From that page I assume that the time frame is 7 days, since the Hadoop
bylaws mention no other length of time a vote may stay open.

--
Aaron T. Myers
Software Engineer, Cloudera

5, 2.

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Aaron T. Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > How the long the vote is suppose to be running? Usual 72 hours? Or
> longer?
>
>
> http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html#Decision+Making
>
> From that page I assume that the time frame is 7 days, since the Hadoop
> bylaws mention no other length of time a vote may stay open.
>
> --
> Aaron T. Myers
> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>

1,6,5,2,4,3

On 06/15/2011 08:49 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
>     We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/

I think #4 modified slightly to make the elephant run on a wheel
or mill like the usual hamster-on-a-wheel thing would be perfect.

Ranjit

Just got a few minutes to look at these. I must say that I'm very
disappointed. Some of the choices are nice clip art but none of them
are appropriate for powered-by logos at typical logo size: <=64 pixels
in height, where they are completely illegible.

I present choice 0, which IMHO is a better candidate than the rest of
the choices:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483197/pbh-64-logos.png

Please find the larger version on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020

__Luke

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
>

Keep in mind that it is thematic elements, not specific implementation that
is being judged here.

Many of these suggestions can be adapted to different font sizes depending
on the desired final rendition
size.

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Luke Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Just got a few minutes to look at these. I must say that I'm very
> disappointed. Some of the choices are nice clip art but none of them
> are appropriate for powered-by logos at typical logo size: <=64 pixels
> in height, where they are completely illegible.
>
> I present choice 0, which IMHO is a better candidate than the rest of
> the choices:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483197/pbh-64-logos.png
>
> Please find the larger version on
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020
>
> __Luke
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > All,
> >   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> all on a page, here:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
> >
> > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
> >
> > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
> >
> > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
> will automatically roll over to your next choice.
> >
> > -- Owen
> >
> >
> >
>

5, 6, 2, 4, 1, 3

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Keep in mind that it is thematic elements, not specific implementation that
> is being judged here.
>
> Many of these suggestions can be adapted to different font sizes depending
> on the desired final rendition
> size.
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Luke Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Just got a few minutes to look at these. I must say that I'm very
> > disappointed. Some of the choices are nice clip art but none of them
> > are appropriate for powered-by logos at typical logo size: <=64 pixels
> > in height, where they are completely illegible.
> >
> > I present choice 0, which IMHO is a better candidate than the rest of
> > the choices:
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483197/pbh-64-logos.png
> >
> > Please find the larger version on
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020
> >
> > __Luke
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > All,
> > >   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put
> them
> > all on a page, here:
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
> > >
> > > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> > voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> > thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
> > >
> > > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
> > >
> > > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> > don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
> > will automatically roll over to your next choice.
> > >
> > > -- Owen
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Agreed. My suggestion is essentially thematic as well, as the Apache
theme is mostly missing from the rest of the entries. My suggestion
emphasizes more on Apache and Hadoop rather than the proverbial
elephant.

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Keep in mind that it is thematic elements, not specific implementation that
> is being judged here.
>
> Many of these suggestions can be adapted to different font sizes depending
> on the desired final rendition
> size.
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Luke Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Just got a few minutes to look at these. I must say that I'm very
>> disappointed. Some of the choices are nice clip art but none of them
>> are appropriate for powered-by logos at typical logo size: <=64 pixels
>> in height, where they are completely illegible.
>>
>> I present choice 0, which IMHO is a better candidate than the rest of
>> the choices:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483197/pbh-64-logos.png
>>
>> Please find the larger version on
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020
>>
>> __Luke
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > All,
>> >   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
>> all on a page, here:
>> >
>> > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>> >
>> > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
>> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
>> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>> >
>> > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>> >
>> > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
>> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
>> will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>> >
>> > -- Owen
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>

Can we still submit logos ?

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Luke Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Just got a few minutes to look at these. I must say that I'm very
> disappointed. Some of the choices are nice clip art but none of them
> are appropriate for powered-by logos at typical logo size: <=64 pixels
> in height, where they are completely illegible.
>
> I present choice 0, which IMHO is a better candidate than the rest of
> the choices:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483197/pbh-64-logos.png
>
> Please find the larger version on
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020
>
> __Luke
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > All,
> >   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> all on a page, here:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
> >
> > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
> >
> > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
> >
> > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
> will automatically roll over to your next choice.
> >
> > -- Owen
> >
> >
> >
>

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:43 PM, web service <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can we still submit logos ?

I encourage everyone who care about the logo to attach submissions to
HADOOP-7020 (make sure you click grant rights to apache in the attach
files form). As Ted said, the logos here are mostly thematic. The
final version would be tweaked by a professional designer with
input/ideas from all the submissions.

> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Luke Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Just got a few minutes to look at these. I must say that I'm very
>> disappointed. Some of the choices are nice clip art but none of them
>> are appropriate for powered-by logos at typical logo size: <=64 pixels
>> in height, where they are completely illegible.
>>
>> I present choice 0, which IMHO is a better candidate than the rest of
>> the choices:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483197/pbh-64-logos.png
>>
>> Please find the larger version on
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020
>>
>> __Luke
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > All,
>> >   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
>> all on a page, here:
>> >
>> > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>> >
>> > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
>> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
>> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>> >
>> > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>> >
>> > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
>> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
>> will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>> >
>> > -- Owen
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>

But keep in mind that creating new logos forever will tend to prevent
consensus being formed.  That will result in the same result as no decision
at all (i.e. everybody will just use their own).

Owen already asked for votes on the original 6.  The only substantive
difference in the new logo is the addition of the feature (and the
esthetic/political sub-text issue of putting the feather in the elephants
nose).  Font size can and will be adjusted.  That adjustment will be done by
our art team in MapR if the circle logo concept is the accepted consensus.

My own view here is that consensus is at least as important as the precise
content.  Adding new options tends to value small details in content over
consensus.  I would prefer to not muddy the issue further.

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Luke Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:43 PM, web service <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can we still submit logos ?
>
> I encourage everyone who care about the logo to attach submissions to
> HADOOP-7020 (make sure you click grant rights to apache in the attach
> files form). As Ted said, the logos here are mostly thematic. The
> final version would be tweaked by a professional designer with
> input/ideas from all the submissions.
>
> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Luke Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Just got a few minutes to look at these. I must say that I'm very
> >> disappointed. Some of the choices are nice clip art but none of them
> >> are appropriate for powered-by logos at typical logo size: <=64 pixels
> >> in height, where they are completely illegible.
> >>
> >> I present choice 0, which IMHO is a better candidate than the rest of
> >> the choices:
> >>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483197/pbh-64-logos.png
> >>
> >> Please find the larger version on
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020
> >>
> >> __Luke
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >> > All,
> >> >   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put
> them
> >> all on a page, here:
> >> >
> >> > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
> >> >
> >> > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> >> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> >> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
> >> >
> >> > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
> >> >
> >> > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> >> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
> >> will automatically roll over to your next choice.
> >> >
> >> > -- Owen
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
>

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But keep in mind that creating new logos forever will tend to prevent
> consensus being formed.  That will result in the same result as no decision
> at all (i.e. everybody will just use their own).
>
> Owen already asked for votes on the original 6.  The only substantive
> difference in the new logo is the addition of the feature (and the
> esthetic/political sub-text issue of putting the feather in the elephants
> nose).  Font size can and will be adjusted.  That adjustment will be done by
> our art team in MapR if the circle logo concept is the accepted consensus.
>

If the circle logo concept is accepted it would be good to adjust the
circle itself, I noticed that the circle in your logo submission is
the same design element used throughout MapR.com.

Thanks,
Eli

Whatever gets picked, I volunteer to have some stickers printed up so
we can all put them on our bikesheds.  Seems appropriate.

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Eli Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> But keep in mind that creating new logos forever will tend to prevent
>> consensus being formed.  That will result in the same result as no decision
>> at all (i.e. everybody will just use their own).
>>
>> Owen already asked for votes on the original 6.  The only substantive
>> difference in the new logo is the addition of the feature (and the
>> esthetic/political sub-text issue of putting the feather in the elephants
>> nose).  Font size can and will be adjusted.  That adjustment will be done by
>> our art team in MapR if the circle logo concept is the accepted consensus.
>>
>
> If the circle logo concept is accepted it would be good to adjust the
> circle itself, I noticed that the circle in your logo submission is
> the same design element used throughout MapR.com.
>
> Thanks,
> Eli
>

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But keep in mind that creating new logos forever will tend to prevent
> consensus being formed.  That will result in the same result as no decision
> at all (i.e. everybody will just use their own).

The the binding votes are from limited number of PMC members. I see no
obstacle reaching consensus even if we have much larger number of
selections.

> Owen already asked for votes on the original 6.  The only substantive
> difference in the new logo is the addition of the feature (and the
> esthetic/political sub-text issue of putting the feather in the elephants
> nose).

Elephant's nose is a versatile hand. What political sub-text are you
talking about? I see no problem with an elephant upholding an apache
feather. OTOH, feather in hand/nose is not the most substantive
element rather than playful variation. The key element is the theme of
apache and hadoop bigger than the proverbial elephant.

>  Font size can and will be adjusted.  That adjustment will be done by
> our art team in MapR if the circle logo concept is the accepted consensus.

Since you eluded aesthetic and political sub-text, the MapR circle is
problematic as well, which IMO looks like a plastic button or a
deformed mouse wheel confining the elephant.

> My own view here is that consensus is at least as important as the precise
> content.  Adding new options tends to value small details in content over
> consensus.  I would prefer to not muddy the issue further.

Again, I see no problem reaching a consensus here, given the limited
number of binding votes.

> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Luke Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:43 PM, web service <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Can we still submit logos ?
>>
>> I encourage everyone who care about the logo to attach submissions to
>> HADOOP-7020 (make sure you click grant rights to apache in the attach
>> files form). As Ted said, the logos here are mostly thematic. The
>> final version would be tweaked by a professional designer with
>> input/ideas from all the submissions.
>>
>> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Luke Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Just got a few minutes to look at these. I must say that I'm very
>> >> disappointed. Some of the choices are nice clip art but none of them
>> >> are appropriate for powered-by logos at typical logo size: <=64 pixels
>> >> in height, where they are completely illegible.
>> >>
>> >> I present choice 0, which IMHO is a better candidate than the rest of
>> >> the choices:
>> >>
>> >>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483197/pbh-64-logos.png
>> >>
>> >> Please find the larger version on
>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020
>> >>
>> >> __Luke
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> >> > All,
>> >> >   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put
>> them
>> >> all on a page, here:
>> >> >
>> >> > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>> >> >
>> >> > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
>> >> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
>> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
>> >> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>> >> >
>> >> > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>> >> >
>> >> > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
>> >> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
>> >> will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>> >> >
>> >> > -- Owen
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>>
>

?

Are you talking about color palette choices?  We use a pretty ordinary
corporate blue based palette which inevitably makes gray tones important.

Or the fact that we put circular borders around badge-like design element
like this: http://mapr.com/images/products/dependable/btn_ha.png ?

I don't think that we have any isolated rings such as the proposed logo on
mapr.com at this time.  We would like to (i.e. if this logo gets approved).

How would you suggest adjusting the circle?

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Eli Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > But keep in mind that creating new logos forever will tend to prevent
> > consensus being formed.  That will result in the same result as no
> decision
> > at all (i.e. everybody will just use their own).
> >
> > Owen already asked for votes on the original 6.  The only substantive
> > difference in the new logo is the addition of the feature (and the
> > esthetic/political sub-text issue of putting the feather in the elephants
> > nose).  Font size can and will be adjusted.  That adjustment will be done
> by
> > our art team in MapR if the circle logo concept is the accepted
> consensus.
> >
>
> If the circle logo concept is accepted it would be good to adjust the
> circle itself, I noticed that the circle in your logo submission is
> the same design element used throughout MapR.com.
>
> Thanks,
> Eli
>

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ?
>
> Are you talking about color palette choices?  We use a pretty ordinary
> corporate blue based palette which inevitably makes gray tones important.
>
> Or the fact that we put circular borders around badge-like design element
> like this: http://mapr.com/images/products/dependable/btn_ha.png ?
>

Yup.

> I don't think that we have any isolated rings such as the proposed logo on
> mapr.com at this time.  We would like to (i.e. if this logo gets approved).
>
> How would you suggest adjusting the circle?
>

Would be good for it not to re-use the same circular border, ie the
design elements should be visually distinct. Assume the artist just
used the existing design element they had and wrapped it around the
Hadoop logo vs creating a new one.

Thanks,
Eli
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Eli Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> > But keep in mind that creating new logos forever will tend to prevent
>> > consensus being formed.  That will result in the same result as no
>> decision
>> > at all (i.e. everybody will just use their own).
>> >
>> > Owen already asked for votes on the original 6.  The only substantive
>> > difference in the new logo is the addition of the feature (and the
>> > esthetic/political sub-text issue of putting the feather in the elephants
>> > nose).  Font size can and will be adjusted.  That adjustment will be done
>> by
>> > our art team in MapR if the circle logo concept is the accepted
>> consensus.
>> >
>>
>> If the circle logo concept is accepted it would be good to adjust the
>> circle itself, I noticed that the circle in your logo submission is
>> the same design element used throughout MapR.com.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Eli
>>
>

My vote: 5 6 4 2 1 3

- Eran

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:19 AM, Owen O'Malley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> All,
>   We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
> will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
>